Conceptualisation of financial capability in adults with acquired cognitive impairment: A qualitative evidence synthesis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Sarah Swan, Freyr Patterson, Terra M Bredy, Jennifer Fleming
{"title":"Conceptualisation of financial capability in adults with acquired cognitive impairment: A qualitative evidence synthesis.","authors":"Sarah Swan, Freyr Patterson, Terra M Bredy, Jennifer Fleming","doi":"10.1177/02692155251347766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo explore definitions, theoretical models and conceptual frameworks related to financial capability in adults with acquired cognitive impairment from acquired brain injury or other neurological disease, including dementia.Data sourcesA systematic search of PubMed (inclusive of Medline), CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ABI-inform, SCOPUS and the Cochrane database for papers published until May 2025.Review methodsA qualitative evidence synthesis approach was utilised in conjunction with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Eligible papers articulated an original comprehensive definition and/or theoretical model or conceptual framework focused on financial capability in the target population. Papers were screened by two researchers, with methodological quality of included papers critically appraised. Data were extracted for tabulation and thematic synthesis, which was completed via coding and categorisation into descriptive and analytical themes.ResultsThe final analysis included 21 papers from the initial screening of 6516 papers. Fifteen discrete models were identified, with results indicating inconsistency in terminology use and meanings. Models that consider real-world performance within an individual's contextual environment are increasingly utilising economics related terminology such as financial capability. The majority of papers related to people with dementia and were multidisciplinary in authorship, or from the psychology literature. Themes found in the literature include the multi-dimensionality of financial capability, financial decision-making ability and exploitation risk for legal capacity, and the neuropathological cause of declining financial capability.ConclusionFurther research with the inclusion of the consumer lived experience is recommended to inform models of care for this complex area of practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155251347766"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251347766","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo explore definitions, theoretical models and conceptual frameworks related to financial capability in adults with acquired cognitive impairment from acquired brain injury or other neurological disease, including dementia.Data sourcesA systematic search of PubMed (inclusive of Medline), CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ABI-inform, SCOPUS and the Cochrane database for papers published until May 2025.Review methodsA qualitative evidence synthesis approach was utilised in conjunction with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Eligible papers articulated an original comprehensive definition and/or theoretical model or conceptual framework focused on financial capability in the target population. Papers were screened by two researchers, with methodological quality of included papers critically appraised. Data were extracted for tabulation and thematic synthesis, which was completed via coding and categorisation into descriptive and analytical themes.ResultsThe final analysis included 21 papers from the initial screening of 6516 papers. Fifteen discrete models were identified, with results indicating inconsistency in terminology use and meanings. Models that consider real-world performance within an individual's contextual environment are increasingly utilising economics related terminology such as financial capability. The majority of papers related to people with dementia and were multidisciplinary in authorship, or from the psychology literature. Themes found in the literature include the multi-dimensionality of financial capability, financial decision-making ability and exploitation risk for legal capacity, and the neuropathological cause of declining financial capability.ConclusionFurther research with the inclusion of the consumer lived experience is recommended to inform models of care for this complex area of practice.

获得性认知障碍成人财务能力的概念化:定性证据综合。
目的探讨获得性脑损伤或其他神经系统疾病(包括痴呆)导致的成人获得性认知障碍患者经济能力的相关定义、理论模型和概念框架。数据来源系统检索PubMed(包括Medline)、CINAHL、EMBASE、PsycINFO、ABI-inform、SCOPUS和Cochrane数据库,检索2025年5月之前发表的论文。评价方法定性证据综合方法与系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目结合使用。合格的论文阐述了一个原始的综合定义和/或理论模型或概念框架,重点关注目标人群的财务能力。论文由两名研究人员筛选,并对纳入的论文的方法学质量进行了批判性评价。提取数据用于制表和专题综合,通过编码和分类为描述性和分析性主题完成。结果初步筛选6516篇论文,最终纳入21篇。确定了15个离散模型,结果表明术语使用和含义不一致。考虑个人背景环境中的现实表现的模型越来越多地使用经济学相关术语,如财务能力。大多数与痴呆症患者有关的论文都是多学科的,或者来自心理学文献。在文献中发现的主题包括财务能力的多维度、财务决策能力和法律行为能力的开发风险、财务能力下降的神经病理原因。结论建议进一步研究包括消费者生活经验,为这一复杂实践领域的护理模式提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信