Does Unidirectional Buccal Patches Loaded With Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Ameliorate Injection Pain in Dental Procedures? A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
{"title":"Does Unidirectional Buccal Patches Loaded With Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Ameliorate Injection Pain in Dental Procedures? A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Elham Panahandeh, Erfaneh Ghassami, Milad Etemadi Sh, Sarah Seyedyousefi, Jaleh Varshosaz","doi":"10.1155/jcpt/9930530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Introduction:</b> Dental anxiety is a critical issue in dentistry. Buccal patches, a noninvasive drug delivery method, can potentially alleviate anxiety and pain during dental procedures. This study aimed to develop a three-layered buccal drug delivery system containing lidocaine or lidocaine–dexmedetomidine for improved pain management in dentistry.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Three-layered patches were made using ethyl cellulose, eudragit, and Carbopol, incorporating either lidocaine or a combination of lidocaine–dexmedetomidine. Forty participants were included: Both groups received placebo patches on one side of jaw and received their relevant drug patch of lidocaine or lidocaine–dexmedetomidine on the other side. Pain levels were assessed.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The patches were 2-3 mm thick with a pH of 3.5–4.5. Lidocaine release efficiency was 41.69 ± 13.10%, and the combination patches showed 47.17 ± 5.10% for lidocaine and 74.71 ± 6.41% for dexmedetomidine. Release time for lidocaine and the combination patch was 25 and 15 min, respectively, with dexmedetomidine fully released within 3 min. The lidocaine–dexmedetomidine group reported significantly lower pain scores (2.1 ± 0.3) compared to the lidocaine group (4.3 ± 0.4) and placebo (6.8 ± 0.5). The onset and duration of analgesia was faster in the combination group versus the lidocaine group (5.2 ± 0.5 vs. 8.7 ± 0.6 min and 45 ± 5 vs. 30 ± 4 min, respectively).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> Buccal patches, especially lidocaine–dexmedetomidine patches, significantly reduce pain and improve patient comfort. These patches offer a promising noninvasive alternative for pain management with enhanced efficacy and patient compliance. Further research is needed to optimize these patches for broader clinical applications.</p>\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> Iranian Clinical Trials Registration Center: IRCT20210118050067N2</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jcpt/9930530","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jcpt/9930530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Dental anxiety is a critical issue in dentistry. Buccal patches, a noninvasive drug delivery method, can potentially alleviate anxiety and pain during dental procedures. This study aimed to develop a three-layered buccal drug delivery system containing lidocaine or lidocaine–dexmedetomidine for improved pain management in dentistry.
Methods: Three-layered patches were made using ethyl cellulose, eudragit, and Carbopol, incorporating either lidocaine or a combination of lidocaine–dexmedetomidine. Forty participants were included: Both groups received placebo patches on one side of jaw and received their relevant drug patch of lidocaine or lidocaine–dexmedetomidine on the other side. Pain levels were assessed.
Results: The patches were 2-3 mm thick with a pH of 3.5–4.5. Lidocaine release efficiency was 41.69 ± 13.10%, and the combination patches showed 47.17 ± 5.10% for lidocaine and 74.71 ± 6.41% for dexmedetomidine. Release time for lidocaine and the combination patch was 25 and 15 min, respectively, with dexmedetomidine fully released within 3 min. The lidocaine–dexmedetomidine group reported significantly lower pain scores (2.1 ± 0.3) compared to the lidocaine group (4.3 ± 0.4) and placebo (6.8 ± 0.5). The onset and duration of analgesia was faster in the combination group versus the lidocaine group (5.2 ± 0.5 vs. 8.7 ± 0.6 min and 45 ± 5 vs. 30 ± 4 min, respectively).
Conclusion: Buccal patches, especially lidocaine–dexmedetomidine patches, significantly reduce pain and improve patient comfort. These patches offer a promising noninvasive alternative for pain management with enhanced efficacy and patient compliance. Further research is needed to optimize these patches for broader clinical applications.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics provides a forum for clinicians, pharmacists and pharmacologists to explore and report on issues of common interest. Reports and commentaries on current issues in medical and pharmaceutical practice are encouraged. Papers on evidence-based clinical practice and multidisciplinary collaborative work are particularly welcome. Regular sections in the journal include: editorials, commentaries, reviews (including systematic overviews and meta-analyses), original research and reports, and book reviews. Its scope embraces all aspects of clinical drug development and therapeutics, including:
Rational therapeutics
Evidence-based practice
Safety, cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of drugs
Drug interactions
Clinical impact of drug formulations
Pharmacogenetics
Personalised, stratified and translational medicine
Clinical pharmacokinetics.