Does Unidirectional Buccal Patches Loaded With Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Ameliorate Injection Pain in Dental Procedures? A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Elham Panahandeh, Erfaneh Ghassami, Milad Etemadi Sh, Sarah Seyedyousefi, Jaleh Varshosaz
{"title":"Does Unidirectional Buccal Patches Loaded With Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Ameliorate Injection Pain in Dental Procedures? A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Elham Panahandeh,&nbsp;Erfaneh Ghassami,&nbsp;Milad Etemadi Sh,&nbsp;Sarah Seyedyousefi,&nbsp;Jaleh Varshosaz","doi":"10.1155/jcpt/9930530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Introduction:</b> Dental anxiety is a critical issue in dentistry. Buccal patches, a noninvasive drug delivery method, can potentially alleviate anxiety and pain during dental procedures. This study aimed to develop a three-layered buccal drug delivery system containing lidocaine or lidocaine–dexmedetomidine for improved pain management in dentistry.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Three-layered patches were made using ethyl cellulose, eudragit, and Carbopol, incorporating either lidocaine or a combination of lidocaine–dexmedetomidine. Forty participants were included: Both groups received placebo patches on one side of jaw and received their relevant drug patch of lidocaine or lidocaine–dexmedetomidine on the other side. Pain levels were assessed.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The patches were 2-3 mm thick with a pH of 3.5–4.5. Lidocaine release efficiency was 41.69 ± 13.10%, and the combination patches showed 47.17 ± 5.10% for lidocaine and 74.71 ± 6.41% for dexmedetomidine. Release time for lidocaine and the combination patch was 25 and 15 min, respectively, with dexmedetomidine fully released within 3 min. The lidocaine–dexmedetomidine group reported significantly lower pain scores (2.1 ± 0.3) compared to the lidocaine group (4.3 ± 0.4) and placebo (6.8 ± 0.5). The onset and duration of analgesia was faster in the combination group versus the lidocaine group (5.2 ± 0.5 vs. 8.7 ± 0.6 min and 45 ± 5 vs. 30 ± 4 min, respectively).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> Buccal patches, especially lidocaine–dexmedetomidine patches, significantly reduce pain and improve patient comfort. These patches offer a promising noninvasive alternative for pain management with enhanced efficacy and patient compliance. Further research is needed to optimize these patches for broader clinical applications.</p>\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> Iranian Clinical Trials Registration Center: IRCT20210118050067N2</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jcpt/9930530","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jcpt/9930530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dental anxiety is a critical issue in dentistry. Buccal patches, a noninvasive drug delivery method, can potentially alleviate anxiety and pain during dental procedures. This study aimed to develop a three-layered buccal drug delivery system containing lidocaine or lidocaine–dexmedetomidine for improved pain management in dentistry.

Methods: Three-layered patches were made using ethyl cellulose, eudragit, and Carbopol, incorporating either lidocaine or a combination of lidocaine–dexmedetomidine. Forty participants were included: Both groups received placebo patches on one side of jaw and received their relevant drug patch of lidocaine or lidocaine–dexmedetomidine on the other side. Pain levels were assessed.

Results: The patches were 2-3 mm thick with a pH of 3.5–4.5. Lidocaine release efficiency was 41.69 ± 13.10%, and the combination patches showed 47.17 ± 5.10% for lidocaine and 74.71 ± 6.41% for dexmedetomidine. Release time for lidocaine and the combination patch was 25 and 15 min, respectively, with dexmedetomidine fully released within 3 min. The lidocaine–dexmedetomidine group reported significantly lower pain scores (2.1 ± 0.3) compared to the lidocaine group (4.3 ± 0.4) and placebo (6.8 ± 0.5). The onset and duration of analgesia was faster in the combination group versus the lidocaine group (5.2 ± 0.5 vs. 8.7 ± 0.6 min and 45 ± 5 vs. 30 ± 4 min, respectively).

Conclusion: Buccal patches, especially lidocaine–dexmedetomidine patches, significantly reduce pain and improve patient comfort. These patches offer a promising noninvasive alternative for pain management with enhanced efficacy and patient compliance. Further research is needed to optimize these patches for broader clinical applications.

Trial Registration: Iranian Clinical Trials Registration Center: IRCT20210118050067N2

Abstract Image

加载利多卡因和右美托咪定的单向口腔贴片是否能改善牙科手术中的注射疼痛?一项双盲随机对照试验
牙科焦虑是牙科的一个重要问题。口腔贴片是一种非侵入性的给药方法,可以潜在地减轻牙科手术期间的焦虑和疼痛。本研究旨在开发一种含有利多卡因或利多卡因-右美托咪定的三层口腔药物输送系统,以改善牙科疼痛管理。方法:采用乙基纤维素、乌龙油和卡波波尔制备三层贴片,加入利多卡因或利多卡因-右美托咪定联合贴片。共纳入40名受试者:两组患者均在一侧下颌接受安慰剂贴片,另一侧接受相应药物贴片,即利多卡因或利多卡因-右美托咪定。评估疼痛程度。结果:斑块厚度为2 ~ 3 mm, pH为3.5 ~ 4.5。利多卡因释药效率为41.69±13.10%,联合贴片释药效率为47.17±5.10%,右美托咪定释药效率为74.71±6.41%。利多卡因和联合贴片的释放时间分别为25 min和15 min,右美托咪定在3 min内完全释放。利多卡因-右美托咪定组疼痛评分(2.1±0.3)明显低于利多卡因组(4.3±0.4)和安慰剂组(6.8±0.5)。联合用药组镇痛起效和持续时间均快于利多卡因组(分别为5.2±0.5 vs 8.7±0.6 min和45±5 vs 30±4 min)。结论:口腔贴片,尤其是利多卡因-右美托咪定贴片,可显著减轻患者疼痛,改善患者舒适度。这些贴片为疼痛管理提供了一种有希望的非侵入性替代方法,具有增强的疗效和患者依从性。为了更广泛的临床应用,需要进一步的研究来优化这些贴片。试验注册:伊朗临床试验注册中心:IRCT20210118050067N2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics provides a forum for clinicians, pharmacists and pharmacologists to explore and report on issues of common interest. Reports and commentaries on current issues in medical and pharmaceutical practice are encouraged. Papers on evidence-based clinical practice and multidisciplinary collaborative work are particularly welcome. Regular sections in the journal include: editorials, commentaries, reviews (including systematic overviews and meta-analyses), original research and reports, and book reviews. Its scope embraces all aspects of clinical drug development and therapeutics, including: Rational therapeutics Evidence-based practice Safety, cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of drugs Drug interactions Clinical impact of drug formulations Pharmacogenetics Personalised, stratified and translational medicine Clinical pharmacokinetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信