Psychological Burdens of Social Work Professionals: A Critical Analysis Within the German Welfare System

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sora Pazer
{"title":"Psychological Burdens of Social Work Professionals: A Critical Analysis Within the German Welfare System","authors":"Sora Pazer","doi":"10.1155/hsc/6624474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>This study investigates the psychological burdens faced by social work professionals within the German welfare system, with a particular focus on three interrelated constructs: administrative workload (job demand), emotional exhaustion (burnout indicator), and professional resilience (personal resource). Drawing on survey data from 143 social workers in Rheinland-Pfalz, collected between January and May 2024 via an online survey (Unipark), the study operationalizes these constructs using standardized Likert-scale instruments. Guided by the job demands–resources (JD–R) model, the analysis examines (a) the relationships between these constructs, (b) their associations with key sociodemographic and professional variables (educational qualification, field of practice, and organization type), and (c) their implications for evidence-based interventions. The findings indicate that a high administrative workload is strongly associated with emotional exhaustion, while professional resilience serves as a mitigating factor. Social workers employed in municipal agencies report significantly higher levels of emotional exhaustion compared to those in free welfare organizations, suggesting that bureaucratic constraints in public-sector social work exacerbate stress levels. In addition, the study finds that professional resilience moderates the relationship between administrative workload and emotional exhaustion, underscoring its protective role against burnout. These results emphasize the urgent need for systemic reforms aimed at reducing bureaucratic burdens, strengthening resilience-building programs, and restructuring administrative processes within social work organizations. The study contributes to the theoretical and practical understanding of occupational stress in social work and provides recommendations for improving worker well-being through targeted interventions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/6624474","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/6624474","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the psychological burdens faced by social work professionals within the German welfare system, with a particular focus on three interrelated constructs: administrative workload (job demand), emotional exhaustion (burnout indicator), and professional resilience (personal resource). Drawing on survey data from 143 social workers in Rheinland-Pfalz, collected between January and May 2024 via an online survey (Unipark), the study operationalizes these constructs using standardized Likert-scale instruments. Guided by the job demands–resources (JD–R) model, the analysis examines (a) the relationships between these constructs, (b) their associations with key sociodemographic and professional variables (educational qualification, field of practice, and organization type), and (c) their implications for evidence-based interventions. The findings indicate that a high administrative workload is strongly associated with emotional exhaustion, while professional resilience serves as a mitigating factor. Social workers employed in municipal agencies report significantly higher levels of emotional exhaustion compared to those in free welfare organizations, suggesting that bureaucratic constraints in public-sector social work exacerbate stress levels. In addition, the study finds that professional resilience moderates the relationship between administrative workload and emotional exhaustion, underscoring its protective role against burnout. These results emphasize the urgent need for systemic reforms aimed at reducing bureaucratic burdens, strengthening resilience-building programs, and restructuring administrative processes within social work organizations. The study contributes to the theoretical and practical understanding of occupational stress in social work and provides recommendations for improving worker well-being through targeted interventions.

社会工作专业人员的心理负担:德国福利制度的批判性分析
本研究调查了德国福利系统中社会工作专业人员所面临的心理负担,特别关注三个相互关联的结构:行政工作量(工作需求),情绪耗竭(倦怠指标)和专业弹性(个人资源)。该研究利用了2024年1月至5月期间通过在线调查(Unipark)收集的来自莱茵-普法尔茨143名社会工作者的调查数据,使用标准化的李克特量表工具对这些结构进行了操作。在工作需求-资源(JD-R)模型的指导下,分析检查了(a)这些构念之间的关系,(b)它们与关键社会人口统计学和专业变量(教育资格、实践领域和组织类型)的关联,以及(c)它们对循证干预的影响。研究结果表明,高行政工作量与情绪耗竭密切相关,而专业弹性则是缓解因素。与在免费福利机构工作的社工相比,受雇于市政机构的社工报告的情绪衰竭程度明显更高,这表明公共部门社工的官僚主义约束加剧了压力水平。此外,研究发现,职业弹性调节行政工作量与情绪耗竭之间的关系,强调其对职业倦怠的保护作用。这些结果强调,迫切需要进行系统性改革,以减少官僚负担,加强复原力建设项目,并重组社会工作组织内的行政流程。本研究有助于对社会工作职业压力的理论和实践理解,并为通过有针对性的干预措施提高工作者的幸福感提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信