Multi-time scale CCUS pipeline network optimization: modeling cost-effective emission reduction trajectories by multi-policy integration

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Jun Zhou, Cui Liu, Guangchuan Liang, Shitao Liu, Zhifu Cheng
{"title":"Multi-time scale CCUS pipeline network optimization: modeling cost-effective emission reduction trajectories by multi-policy integration","authors":"Jun Zhou,&nbsp;Cui Liu,&nbsp;Guangchuan Liang,&nbsp;Shitao Liu,&nbsp;Zhifu Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As global climate change escalates, curbing greenhouse gas emissions has emerged as a shared imperative and pressing necessity for the global community. Recognized as a critical decarbonization mechanism, carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) systems require source-sink matching optimization to maximize their carbon sequestration potential. However, current research on source-sink matching predominantly focuses on a single dimension of space, time, or policy, lacking an integrated consideration of these three dimensions. Based on this, and in combination with the regional emission reduction requirements, a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) framework was developed to enable carbon quota trading among sources. The model took into account not only the economy of CCUS technology but also its flexibility and adaptability during the multi-period construction process. The study divided the CCUS pipeline network into multiple construction periods and formulated differentiated emission reduction targets and policies for each. The aim was to optimize the network layout, considering time, space, and policy dimensions, to maximize emission reduction benefits and minimize costs. Case study verification revealed that, without considering carbon trading and carbon taxes, the total project cost increased yearly from 1.42 × 10⁹ USD in period u1 to 8.23 × 10<sup>9</sup> USD in u8, with a marginal emission reduction cost of 35.64 USD/t. In contrast, when carbon tax and trading mechanisms were incorporated, the total cost still rose (from 1.08 × 10⁹ USD in u1 to 5.32 × 10<sup>9</sup> USD in u8), but the marginal cost decreased by 21.12 % to 182.29 USD/t. This demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed multi-period adjustment method and the synergistic role of policy integration in reducing decarbonization costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":286,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 109239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135425002431","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As global climate change escalates, curbing greenhouse gas emissions has emerged as a shared imperative and pressing necessity for the global community. Recognized as a critical decarbonization mechanism, carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) systems require source-sink matching optimization to maximize their carbon sequestration potential. However, current research on source-sink matching predominantly focuses on a single dimension of space, time, or policy, lacking an integrated consideration of these three dimensions. Based on this, and in combination with the regional emission reduction requirements, a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) framework was developed to enable carbon quota trading among sources. The model took into account not only the economy of CCUS technology but also its flexibility and adaptability during the multi-period construction process. The study divided the CCUS pipeline network into multiple construction periods and formulated differentiated emission reduction targets and policies for each. The aim was to optimize the network layout, considering time, space, and policy dimensions, to maximize emission reduction benefits and minimize costs. Case study verification revealed that, without considering carbon trading and carbon taxes, the total project cost increased yearly from 1.42 × 10⁹ USD in period u1 to 8.23 × 109 USD in u8, with a marginal emission reduction cost of 35.64 USD/t. In contrast, when carbon tax and trading mechanisms were incorporated, the total cost still rose (from 1.08 × 10⁹ USD in u1 to 5.32 × 109 USD in u8), but the marginal cost decreased by 21.12 % to 182.29 USD/t. This demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed multi-period adjustment method and the synergistic role of policy integration in reducing decarbonization costs.
多时间尺度CCUS管网优化:基于多政策整合的成本效益减排轨迹建模
随着全球气候变化的加剧,遏制温室气体排放已成为国际社会共同的当务之急和迫切需要。碳捕获、利用和封存(CCUS)系统是一种重要的脱碳机制,需要对源库匹配进行优化,以最大限度地发挥其碳封存潜力。然而,目前对源汇匹配的研究主要集中在空间、时间或政策的单一维度上,缺乏对这三个维度的综合考虑。在此基础上,结合区域减排要求,开发了混合整数线性规划(MILP)框架,实现了源间碳配额交易。该模型既考虑了CCUS技术的经济性,又考虑了CCUS技术在多期施工过程中的灵活性和适应性。本研究将CCUS管网划分为多个建设期,并针对每个建设期制定了差异化的减排目标和政策。其目的是优化网络布局,考虑时间、空间和政策维度,实现减排效益最大化和成本最小化。案例研究验证表明,在不考虑碳交易和碳税的情况下,项目总成本从u1期的1.42 × 10⁹美元逐年增加到u8期的8.23 × 109美元,边际减排成本为35.64美元/t。与此形成对比的是,当碳税和碳交易机制相结合时,总成本仍有所上升(从1年的1.08 × 10(9)美元上升到8年的5.32 × 109美元),但边际成本下降了21.12%,为182.29美元/吨。这证明了所提出的多周期调整方法的有效性,以及政策整合对降低脱碳成本的协同作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Chemical Engineering
Computers & Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Chemical Engineering is primarily a journal of record for new developments in the application of computing and systems technology to chemical engineering problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信