Predicting footpad lesion scores of Dutch broiler flocks using routinely collected data

IF 5.7 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
Yara Slegers , Miel Hostens , Sjaak de Wit , Arjan Stegeman , Dan B Jensen
{"title":"Predicting footpad lesion scores of Dutch broiler flocks using routinely collected data","authors":"Yara Slegers ,&nbsp;Miel Hostens ,&nbsp;Sjaak de Wit ,&nbsp;Arjan Stegeman ,&nbsp;Dan B Jensen","doi":"10.1016/j.atech.2025.101080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Footpad lesions (FPL) are a prevalent welfare concern in broilers, influenced by various factors such as farm management practices and season. In the Netherlands, FPL scores are monitored at slaughter and linked to corrective measures. Early prediction of FPL scores could enable timely interventions. This study investigated the potential of routinely collected data to predict FPL scores at slaughter. Data from 592 broiler houses, each with at least 30 consecutive flocks, across 190 farms were included. The ability of various models to predict FPL scores above or below the threshold of 80 was compared. These models included univariate dynamic linear models (DLMs); multivariate DLMs using weather data of the first week of the production cycle; and random forest models using previous flock scores or DLM output, first-week weather variables, and current and previous flock and farm characteristics. Incorporation of DLM output in the random forest model provided the numerically highest performance, although this was not significantly better than the random forest model with raw previous flock scores. This model achieved an ROC AUC of 0.70, with the best threshold yielding a sensitivity of 74.4% and specificity of 60.2%. Previous flock FPL was the most important predictor, followed by the fraction of birds thinned, flock size difference between previous and current flock, and outside humidity. These findings highlight the value of weather variables in predicting FPL scores. Future research should explore additional factors which could explain within-house variation, such as indoor climate and feed changes, to improve predictive accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74813,"journal":{"name":"Smart agricultural technology","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 101080"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart agricultural technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375525003132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Footpad lesions (FPL) are a prevalent welfare concern in broilers, influenced by various factors such as farm management practices and season. In the Netherlands, FPL scores are monitored at slaughter and linked to corrective measures. Early prediction of FPL scores could enable timely interventions. This study investigated the potential of routinely collected data to predict FPL scores at slaughter. Data from 592 broiler houses, each with at least 30 consecutive flocks, across 190 farms were included. The ability of various models to predict FPL scores above or below the threshold of 80 was compared. These models included univariate dynamic linear models (DLMs); multivariate DLMs using weather data of the first week of the production cycle; and random forest models using previous flock scores or DLM output, first-week weather variables, and current and previous flock and farm characteristics. Incorporation of DLM output in the random forest model provided the numerically highest performance, although this was not significantly better than the random forest model with raw previous flock scores. This model achieved an ROC AUC of 0.70, with the best threshold yielding a sensitivity of 74.4% and specificity of 60.2%. Previous flock FPL was the most important predictor, followed by the fraction of birds thinned, flock size difference between previous and current flock, and outside humidity. These findings highlight the value of weather variables in predicting FPL scores. Future research should explore additional factors which could explain within-house variation, such as indoor climate and feed changes, to improve predictive accuracy.
利用常规采集数据预测荷兰肉鸡鸡脚垫损伤评分
脚垫病变(FPL)是肉鸡普遍关注的福利问题,受农场管理方法和季节等多种因素的影响。在荷兰,FPL分数在屠宰时进行监测,并与纠正措施相关联。FPL评分的早期预测可以实现及时干预。本研究调查了常规收集数据预测屠宰时FPL评分的潜力。数据来自190个农场的592个鸡舍,每个鸡舍至少有30个连续的鸡群。比较了各种模型预测FPL分数高于或低于80分阈值的能力。这些模型包括单变量动态线性模型(DLMs);基于生产周期第一周天气数据的多元DLMs;随机森林模型使用以前的羊群得分或DLM输出,第一周的天气变量,以及当前和以前的羊群和农场特征。在随机森林模型中加入DLM输出提供了数值上最高的性能,尽管这并不比具有原始先前羊群得分的随机森林模型好得多。该模型的ROC AUC为0.70,最佳阈值敏感性为74.4%,特异性为60.2%。前一群的FPL是最重要的预测因子,其次是鸟类的稀薄程度、前一群与当前群的大小差异和外部湿度。这些发现突出了天气变量在预测FPL分数中的价值。未来的研究应该探索能够解释内部变化的其他因素,如室内气候和饲料变化,以提高预测的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信