{"title":"Impact of multi-dimensional cognitive demands on takeover performance, physiological and eye-tracking measures in conditionally automated vehicles","authors":"Ange Wang , Wenxin Shi , Dengbo He , Hai Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Before fully autonomous vehicles come true, drivers are still required to be responsible for driving safety and take over control of the vehicle when prompted by takeover requests in conditionally automated vehicles. Thus, drivers’ takeover performance can affect the safety of conditionally automated driving. However, though cognitive distraction can impair takeover performance in general, the influence of multi-dimensionality in the cognitive resources was under-investigated. At the same time, it is unknown how physiological and eye-tracking metrics are associated with different modalities of cognitive tasks in conditionally automated vehicles. Thus, through a driving simulation study with 42 participants, we investigated the effects of multidimensional cognitive demands, as imposed by multiple types of non-driving-related tasks, on drivers’ takeover performance, physiological responses, and eye-tracking metrics in conditionally automated vehicles. Results showed that certain takeover performance (i.e., vehicle speed and lateral acceleration), and physiological and eye-tracking metrics (i.e., differences between consecutive R-peaks, skin conductance level, variation in respiratory intervals, number of fixations, number of saccades and saccade angle) are still responsive to cognitive load in the context of driving automation. Further, the modality of the cognitive tasks can moderate the takeover performance (i.e., takeover time) and certain physiological (i.e., ratio of spectral power in the low- and high-frequency range and respiration depth) metrics. These findings suggest that, in future conditionally automated vehicles, in-vehicle task designs should consider the modality of the cognitive demands for driving safety and for the performance of the driver monitoring systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 461-475"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825002190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Before fully autonomous vehicles come true, drivers are still required to be responsible for driving safety and take over control of the vehicle when prompted by takeover requests in conditionally automated vehicles. Thus, drivers’ takeover performance can affect the safety of conditionally automated driving. However, though cognitive distraction can impair takeover performance in general, the influence of multi-dimensionality in the cognitive resources was under-investigated. At the same time, it is unknown how physiological and eye-tracking metrics are associated with different modalities of cognitive tasks in conditionally automated vehicles. Thus, through a driving simulation study with 42 participants, we investigated the effects of multidimensional cognitive demands, as imposed by multiple types of non-driving-related tasks, on drivers’ takeover performance, physiological responses, and eye-tracking metrics in conditionally automated vehicles. Results showed that certain takeover performance (i.e., vehicle speed and lateral acceleration), and physiological and eye-tracking metrics (i.e., differences between consecutive R-peaks, skin conductance level, variation in respiratory intervals, number of fixations, number of saccades and saccade angle) are still responsive to cognitive load in the context of driving automation. Further, the modality of the cognitive tasks can moderate the takeover performance (i.e., takeover time) and certain physiological (i.e., ratio of spectral power in the low- and high-frequency range and respiration depth) metrics. These findings suggest that, in future conditionally automated vehicles, in-vehicle task designs should consider the modality of the cognitive demands for driving safety and for the performance of the driver monitoring systems.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.