Ahmet Kaya , Hasan Emin Gurler , Nazan Güngör Karyağdı , Mehmet Özçalıcı , Yusuf Akpınar , Nurettin Koca , Dragan Pamucar
{"title":"Decision-analytics-based enhancing auditor performance evaluation: Application of multi-criteria methodology with Monte Carlo simulation","authors":"Ahmet Kaya , Hasan Emin Gurler , Nazan Güngör Karyağdı , Mehmet Özçalıcı , Yusuf Akpınar , Nurettin Koca , Dragan Pamucar","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study highlights the critical importance of auditor performance, as it directly influences the quality and reliability of financial reporting, which is crucial for maintaining trust in financial markets. High-performing auditing firms contribute to improved transparency and accountability, which are essential for effective corporate governance and investor confidence. The study evaluates the performance of 27 auditing firms in Turkey using two advanced MCDM methods: WENSLO and ARTASI. By focusing on measurable, operational factors such as the number of audited companies, training duration, and client exposure, the study provides a more data-driven and objective approach to performance evaluation. The WENSLO method assigns weights to these criteria, while ARTASI ranks the firms accordingly. According to the WENSLO results, the two most important criteria among those examined are the number of completed audits and the duration of training. The results reveal that PKF, HSY, and YEDITEPE are the top performers, while ECOVIZ, VEZIN, and REFORM ranked the lowest. The study’s contribution lies in its novel approach to performance assessment, offering a comprehensive, data-driven evaluation model that emphasizes quantifiable metrics. It also demonstrates the robustness of the findings through sensitivity analyses and comparisons with other MCDM techniques, such as MABAC and TOPSIS. The study also incorporates a Monte Carlo simulation, which tested the impact of random weight variations on the ARTASI rankings. The simulation confirmed the robustness of the rankings, revealing that certain firms consistently outperformed others, regardless of changes in the weight distribution. The findings suggest that industry specialization and operational factors play a significant role in auditing performance, and future research could expand these criteria or explore additional MCDM methods to enhance the reliability and generalizability of results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50461,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems with Applications","volume":"291 ","pages":"Article 128561"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417425021803","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study highlights the critical importance of auditor performance, as it directly influences the quality and reliability of financial reporting, which is crucial for maintaining trust in financial markets. High-performing auditing firms contribute to improved transparency and accountability, which are essential for effective corporate governance and investor confidence. The study evaluates the performance of 27 auditing firms in Turkey using two advanced MCDM methods: WENSLO and ARTASI. By focusing on measurable, operational factors such as the number of audited companies, training duration, and client exposure, the study provides a more data-driven and objective approach to performance evaluation. The WENSLO method assigns weights to these criteria, while ARTASI ranks the firms accordingly. According to the WENSLO results, the two most important criteria among those examined are the number of completed audits and the duration of training. The results reveal that PKF, HSY, and YEDITEPE are the top performers, while ECOVIZ, VEZIN, and REFORM ranked the lowest. The study’s contribution lies in its novel approach to performance assessment, offering a comprehensive, data-driven evaluation model that emphasizes quantifiable metrics. It also demonstrates the robustness of the findings through sensitivity analyses and comparisons with other MCDM techniques, such as MABAC and TOPSIS. The study also incorporates a Monte Carlo simulation, which tested the impact of random weight variations on the ARTASI rankings. The simulation confirmed the robustness of the rankings, revealing that certain firms consistently outperformed others, regardless of changes in the weight distribution. The findings suggest that industry specialization and operational factors play a significant role in auditing performance, and future research could expand these criteria or explore additional MCDM methods to enhance the reliability and generalizability of results.
期刊介绍:
Expert Systems With Applications is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information on expert and intelligent systems used globally in industry, government, and universities. The journal emphasizes original papers covering the design, development, testing, implementation, and management of these systems, offering practical guidelines. It spans various sectors such as finance, engineering, marketing, law, project management, information management, medicine, and more. The journal also welcomes papers on multi-agent systems, knowledge management, neural networks, knowledge discovery, data mining, and other related areas, excluding applications to military/defense systems.