Comprehensive Fuel and Emissions Measurements Highlight Uncertainties in Smoke Production Using Predictive Modeling Tools

Afsara Tasnia, Guadalupe Lara, Daniel Foster, Deep Sengupta, James D. A. Butler, Thomas W. Kirchstetter, Robert York, Nathan M. Kreisberg, Allen H. Goldstein, John J. Battles and Kelley C. Barsanti*, 
{"title":"Comprehensive Fuel and Emissions Measurements Highlight Uncertainties in Smoke Production Using Predictive Modeling Tools","authors":"Afsara Tasnia,&nbsp;Guadalupe Lara,&nbsp;Daniel Foster,&nbsp;Deep Sengupta,&nbsp;James D. A. Butler,&nbsp;Thomas W. Kirchstetter,&nbsp;Robert York,&nbsp;Nathan M. Kreisberg,&nbsp;Allen H. Goldstein,&nbsp;John J. Battles and Kelley C. Barsanti*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.4c0014210.1021/acsestair.4c00142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Predictive modeling tools, such as the First Order Fire Effects Model (FOFEM), are used to generate estimates of the effects from wildland fires, including fuel consumption and smoke emissions. Given the use of such models in planning and forecasting for wildland fires, coupled with the adverse health and climate impacts of smoke, there is a need to understand the sensitivity to model inputs and processes, evaluate smoke production, and identify critical uncertainties. In this work, FOFEM was applied to a series of prescribed burns at the Blodgett Forest Research Station (BFRS), a western mixed coniferous forest in northern California, adapted to a frequent low-severity fire regime. We evaluated the sensitivity of predicted smoke emissions to parametric uncertainty in model inputs, including fuel characteristics (composition, loading, and moisture) and emission factors (EFs), and structural uncertainty in the consumption model. The results of the modeling simulations and comparison with a unique and comprehensive suite of fuel and emissions measurements suggest that in this application of FOFEM, fuel loadings based on land cover maps had the highest uncertainty and resulted in the largest sensitivity in predicted smoke emissions. The use of land-cover-based fuel loading values significantly underpredicted gas and particle emissions from the prescribed burns by up to ∼80% for carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) and by up to ∼85% for fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>). Improvement in the predicted smoke emissions could specifically be achieved by more accurate fuel loading data, particularly for duff and coarse wood, the consumption of which generated the majority of gas (∼50–70%) and particle (∼65%) emissions. For individual gaseous nonmethane organic compounds (NMOCs), predicted emissions were additionally sensitive to uncertainty in EFs, demonstrating that the accurate prediction of these NMOCs requires accurate representation of fuel consumption as well as representative EFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"2 6","pages":"982–997 982–997"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.4c00142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predictive modeling tools, such as the First Order Fire Effects Model (FOFEM), are used to generate estimates of the effects from wildland fires, including fuel consumption and smoke emissions. Given the use of such models in planning and forecasting for wildland fires, coupled with the adverse health and climate impacts of smoke, there is a need to understand the sensitivity to model inputs and processes, evaluate smoke production, and identify critical uncertainties. In this work, FOFEM was applied to a series of prescribed burns at the Blodgett Forest Research Station (BFRS), a western mixed coniferous forest in northern California, adapted to a frequent low-severity fire regime. We evaluated the sensitivity of predicted smoke emissions to parametric uncertainty in model inputs, including fuel characteristics (composition, loading, and moisture) and emission factors (EFs), and structural uncertainty in the consumption model. The results of the modeling simulations and comparison with a unique and comprehensive suite of fuel and emissions measurements suggest that in this application of FOFEM, fuel loadings based on land cover maps had the highest uncertainty and resulted in the largest sensitivity in predicted smoke emissions. The use of land-cover-based fuel loading values significantly underpredicted gas and particle emissions from the prescribed burns by up to ∼80% for carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO2) and by up to ∼85% for fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Improvement in the predicted smoke emissions could specifically be achieved by more accurate fuel loading data, particularly for duff and coarse wood, the consumption of which generated the majority of gas (∼50–70%) and particle (∼65%) emissions. For individual gaseous nonmethane organic compounds (NMOCs), predicted emissions were additionally sensitive to uncertainty in EFs, demonstrating that the accurate prediction of these NMOCs requires accurate representation of fuel consumption as well as representative EFs.

综合燃料和排放测量强调使用预测建模工具烟雾生产的不确定性
预测建模工具,如一阶火灾效应模型(FOFEM),用于估算野火的影响,包括燃料消耗和烟雾排放。考虑到在规划和预测荒地火灾时使用这种模型,再加上烟雾对健康和气候的不利影响,有必要了解对模型输入和过程的敏感性,评估烟雾产生,并确定关键的不确定性。在这项工作中,FOFEM应用于Blodgett森林研究站(BFRS)的一系列规定烧伤,该研究站是加利福尼亚州北部西部混交林,适应频繁的低严重火灾制度。我们评估了预测烟雾排放对模型输入参数不确定性的敏感性,包括燃料特性(成分、负载和湿度)和排放因子(EFs),以及消耗模型中的结构不确定性。建模模拟的结果以及与一套独特而全面的燃料和排放测量的比较表明,在FOFEM的这种应用中,基于土地覆盖图的燃料负荷具有最高的不确定性,并导致预测烟雾排放的最大灵敏度。基于土地覆盖的燃料负荷值的使用大大低估了规定燃烧产生的气体和颗粒排放,一氧化碳(CO)和二氧化碳(CO2)的排放量可达80%,细颗粒物(PM2.5)的排放量可达85%。通过更准确的燃料装载数据,特别是对于粗布和粗木材,可以实现预测烟雾排放的改善,因为它们的消耗产生了大部分气体(~ 50-70%)和颗粒(~ 65%)排放。对于单个气态非甲烷有机化合物(nmoc),预测排放量对EFs的不确定性也很敏感,这表明对这些nmoc的准确预测需要准确地表示燃料消耗以及具有代表性的EFs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信