Investigating Aerial Data Preanalysis Schemes and Site-Level Methane Emission Aggregation Methods at Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities

Olga Khaliukova*, Yuanrui Zhu, William S. Daniels, Arvind P. Ravikumar, Gregory B. Ross, Selina A. Roman-White, Fiji C. George and Dorit M. Hammerling, 
{"title":"Investigating Aerial Data Preanalysis Schemes and Site-Level Methane Emission Aggregation Methods at Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities","authors":"Olga Khaliukova*,&nbsp;Yuanrui Zhu,&nbsp;William S. Daniels,&nbsp;Arvind P. Ravikumar,&nbsp;Gregory B. Ross,&nbsp;Selina A. Roman-White,&nbsp;Fiji C. George and Dorit M. Hammerling,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.4c0030110.1021/acsestair.4c00301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Methane observations at liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities play an important role in characterizing methane emissions from the natural gas supply chain. The large size and complexity of LNG facilities make quantifying emissions with ground-based monitoring systems challenging, making aerial platforms one of the preferred methods for detecting and estimating methane emissions at these sites. However, aerial measurements typically provide a snapshot of emissions at a given instance, necessitating further analytical steps to infer both annualized emissions and the range of possible emissions at different instances in time. This study uses aerial measurements at two U.S. LNG facilities from a Quantification, Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification project to characterize the distribution of temporally averaged emissions (i.e., annualized inventories) and possible site-level emissions at any given point in time (“instantaneous emissions”). The former provides uncertainty on the aerial measurement component of measurement-informed annual inventories, while the latter helps contextualize future snapshot measurements, such as those from aerial surveys or high-resolution satellite platforms, at LNG facilities. We find that instantaneous emissions may fall well outside of the distribution describing uncertainty in the annual inventory. We also compare different preanalysis schemes for aerial data, as existing literature does not provide a clear consensus on methods for doing so, especially at LNG facilities. We find the persistence assumption to be the most critical preanalysis factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"2 6","pages":"1009–1019 1009–1019"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.4c00301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methane observations at liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities play an important role in characterizing methane emissions from the natural gas supply chain. The large size and complexity of LNG facilities make quantifying emissions with ground-based monitoring systems challenging, making aerial platforms one of the preferred methods for detecting and estimating methane emissions at these sites. However, aerial measurements typically provide a snapshot of emissions at a given instance, necessitating further analytical steps to infer both annualized emissions and the range of possible emissions at different instances in time. This study uses aerial measurements at two U.S. LNG facilities from a Quantification, Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification project to characterize the distribution of temporally averaged emissions (i.e., annualized inventories) and possible site-level emissions at any given point in time (“instantaneous emissions”). The former provides uncertainty on the aerial measurement component of measurement-informed annual inventories, while the latter helps contextualize future snapshot measurements, such as those from aerial surveys or high-resolution satellite platforms, at LNG facilities. We find that instantaneous emissions may fall well outside of the distribution describing uncertainty in the annual inventory. We also compare different preanalysis schemes for aerial data, as existing literature does not provide a clear consensus on methods for doing so, especially at LNG facilities. We find the persistence assumption to be the most critical preanalysis factor.

液化天然气设施空中数据预分析方案及现场甲烷排放聚集方法研究
液化天然气(LNG)设施的甲烷观测对表征天然气供应链中的甲烷排放起着重要作用。LNG设施的规模和复杂性使得地面监测系统的排放量量化具有挑战性,因此空中平台成为检测和估计这些地点甲烷排放量的首选方法之一。然而,航空测量通常提供给定实例的排放快照,需要进一步的分析步骤来推断年排放量和不同实例的可能排放量范围。本研究使用来自量化、监测、报告和验证项目的两个美国液化天然气设施的航空测量来表征任何给定时间点的临时平均排放量(即年化库存)和可能的现场水平排放量(“瞬时排放”)的分布。前者提供了基于测量信息的年度库存中航空测量部分的不确定性,而后者有助于在LNG设施中实现未来的快照测量,例如来自航空测量或高分辨率卫星平台的测量。我们发现,瞬时排放量可能落在描述年度库存不确定性的分布之外。我们还比较了航空数据的不同预分析方案,因为现有文献并未就这样做的方法提供明确的共识,特别是在液化天然气设施中。我们发现持续性假设是最关键的预分析因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信