Pharmacological approach to rapid sequence induction/intubation: a contemporary perspective.

Current opinion in anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-28 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001528
Massimiliano Sorbello, Daniele Salvatore Paternò, Ivana Zdravkovic, Luigi La Via
{"title":"Pharmacological approach to rapid sequence induction/intubation: a contemporary perspective.","authors":"Massimiliano Sorbello, Daniele Salvatore Paternò, Ivana Zdravkovic, Luigi La Via","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review examines the evolution of the pharmacological approach to rapid sequence induction/intubation (RSII) over the past 55 years, highlighting recent advances and contemporary perspectives on managing full-stomach patients requiring airway control.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>While aspiration remains a significant concern during RSII (occurring in 3-6% of cases), recent data suggests that desaturation, hypoxemia, and hemodynamic instability pose even greater risks, particularly in critically ill patients. Modern RSII approaches have evolved significantly from Safar's original protocol. Cricoid pressure is increasingly questioned, with evidence suggesting it may be unnecessary except when active regurgitation is observed. Gentle ventilation postinduction appears safe and beneficial when desaturation risk is high. Regarding pharmacology, succinylcholine has largely been replaced by rocuronium, while ketamine and etomidate are preferred over propofol for hemodynamically unstable patients. glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists may increase residual gastric content but have not definitively been linked to increased aspiration rates. First-pass success (currently ~84%) is crucial, as complications increase exponentially with multiple attempts.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Contemporary RSII should balance aspiration prevention with avoiding hypoxemia and hemodynamic collapse. This requires thorough patient assessment, appropriate drug selection, optimal positioning, and effective teamwork. The priority should be making the first intubation attempt the best possible attempt, with preintubation optimization and consideration of human factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":520600,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"369-374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review examines the evolution of the pharmacological approach to rapid sequence induction/intubation (RSII) over the past 55 years, highlighting recent advances and contemporary perspectives on managing full-stomach patients requiring airway control.

Recent findings: While aspiration remains a significant concern during RSII (occurring in 3-6% of cases), recent data suggests that desaturation, hypoxemia, and hemodynamic instability pose even greater risks, particularly in critically ill patients. Modern RSII approaches have evolved significantly from Safar's original protocol. Cricoid pressure is increasingly questioned, with evidence suggesting it may be unnecessary except when active regurgitation is observed. Gentle ventilation postinduction appears safe and beneficial when desaturation risk is high. Regarding pharmacology, succinylcholine has largely been replaced by rocuronium, while ketamine and etomidate are preferred over propofol for hemodynamically unstable patients. glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists may increase residual gastric content but have not definitively been linked to increased aspiration rates. First-pass success (currently ~84%) is crucial, as complications increase exponentially with multiple attempts.

Summary: Contemporary RSII should balance aspiration prevention with avoiding hypoxemia and hemodynamic collapse. This requires thorough patient assessment, appropriate drug selection, optimal positioning, and effective teamwork. The priority should be making the first intubation attempt the best possible attempt, with preintubation optimization and consideration of human factors.

快速序列诱导/插管的药理学方法:当代视角。
综述目的:本综述回顾了过去55年来快速序列诱导/插管(RSII)药理学方法的发展,重点介绍了在管理需要气道控制的全胃患者方面的最新进展和当代观点。最近的发现:虽然误吸仍然是RSII期间的重要问题(发生在3-6%的病例中),但最近的数据表明,去饱和、低氧血症和血流动力学不稳定构成更大的风险,特别是在危重患者中。现代RSII方法已经从Safar的原始协议中得到了显著的发展。环状膜压力越来越受到质疑,有证据表明,除非观察到主动反流,否则可能没有必要。当去饱和风险高时,诱导后温和通气是安全有益的。在药理学方面,琥珀酰胆碱在很大程度上已被罗库溴铵取代,而对于血流动力学不稳定的患者,氯胺酮和依托咪酯优于异丙酚。胰高血糖素样肽1激动剂可能增加残余胃内容物,但尚未明确与吸入率增加有关。第一次通过的成功率(目前约为84%)是至关重要的,因为多次尝试会导致并发症成倍增加。总结:当代RSII应平衡预防误吸与避免低氧血症和血流动力学衰竭。这需要彻底的病人评估,适当的药物选择,最佳定位和有效的团队合作。优先考虑的是使第一次插管尝试成为可能的最佳尝试,并考虑插管前的优化和人为因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信