Closed claims analysis in nonoperating room anesthesia.

IF 2.1
Current opinion in anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-24 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001536
Annika Wanner, Ruben Klimke, Markus M Luedi, Richard D Urman
{"title":"Closed claims analysis in nonoperating room anesthesia.","authors":"Annika Wanner, Ruben Klimke, Markus M Luedi, Richard D Urman","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) is an evolving field driven by technological advancements that enable minimally invasive procedures outside operating rooms. While expanding access to interventional procedures, NORA environments introduce impcatful challenges, including patient complexity, rapid procedural turnover, preoperative assessment, inconsistent team familiarity, and limited emergency preparedness.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Closed claims data analysis provides critical insights into risks associated with NORA procedures. Studies indicate that while overall malpractice claims in NORA remain relatively low, the incidence of claims is significantly higher compared with the operating room cases. Common complications include airway management failures, respiratory depression, and inadequate ventilation, with aspiration pneumonitis occurring nearly twice as often in NORA settings. Furthermore, cardiovascular instability and hemodynamic events are prevalent among high-risk procedures, particularly in cardiology and radiology suites.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Effective risk reduction requires thorough patient selection, the implementation of strict monitoring protocols, and adherence to standardized safety guidelines. Strategies such as enhanced preoperative screening, structured emergency preparedness, and increased utilization of advanced airway management tools like videolaryngoscopy can significantly reduce complications. In addition, implementing site-specific checklists, reinforcing interdisciplinary communication, and improving provider training is inevitable. Refining monitoring technologies and improving closed-loop anesthesia systems offer exciting potential to enhance patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":520600,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"418-424"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) is an evolving field driven by technological advancements that enable minimally invasive procedures outside operating rooms. While expanding access to interventional procedures, NORA environments introduce impcatful challenges, including patient complexity, rapid procedural turnover, preoperative assessment, inconsistent team familiarity, and limited emergency preparedness.

Recent findings: Closed claims data analysis provides critical insights into risks associated with NORA procedures. Studies indicate that while overall malpractice claims in NORA remain relatively low, the incidence of claims is significantly higher compared with the operating room cases. Common complications include airway management failures, respiratory depression, and inadequate ventilation, with aspiration pneumonitis occurring nearly twice as often in NORA settings. Furthermore, cardiovascular instability and hemodynamic events are prevalent among high-risk procedures, particularly in cardiology and radiology suites.

Summary: Effective risk reduction requires thorough patient selection, the implementation of strict monitoring protocols, and adherence to standardized safety guidelines. Strategies such as enhanced preoperative screening, structured emergency preparedness, and increased utilization of advanced airway management tools like videolaryngoscopy can significantly reduce complications. In addition, implementing site-specific checklists, reinforcing interdisciplinary communication, and improving provider training is inevitable. Refining monitoring technologies and improving closed-loop anesthesia systems offer exciting potential to enhance patient safety.

非手术麻醉的封闭式索赔分析。
综述目的:非手术室麻醉(NORA)是一个不断发展的领域,技术进步使手术室外的微创手术成为可能。在扩大介入手术的可及性的同时,NORA环境也带来了影响深远的挑战,包括患者复杂性、快速的程序周转、术前评估、不一致的团队熟悉度和有限的应急准备。最近的发现:封闭索赔数据分析提供了与NORA程序相关的风险的关键见解。研究表明,虽然NORA的总体医疗事故索赔仍然相对较低,但索赔的发生率明显高于手术室案件。常见的并发症包括气道管理失败、呼吸抑制和通气不足,在NORA环境中吸入性肺炎的发生率几乎是其两倍。此外,心血管不稳定和血流动力学事件在高危手术中普遍存在,特别是在心脏病学和放射学套房。摘要:有效降低风险需要对患者进行彻底的选择,实施严格的监测方案,并遵守标准化的安全指南。加强术前筛查、结构化应急准备和增加使用先进的气道管理工具(如视频喉镜检查)等策略可以显著减少并发症。此外,实施特定地点的检查清单、加强跨学科交流和改进提供者培训是不可避免的。改进监测技术和改进闭环麻醉系统为提高患者安全提供了令人兴奋的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信