Elizabeth Charnysh, Sarah McCain, Alexandra Truhlar, Subhamoy Pal, Jonathan M Reader, Kunal Sanghavi, Wendy R Uhlmann, Katherine Hendy, Amy Leader, Drew Blasco, Anya E R Prince, William Gregory Feero, Rachael Brandt, Veda N Giri, Charles Lee, J Scott Roberts
{"title":"Perceived understanding and psychosocial outcomes: employees' responses to learning results of workplace genetic testing.","authors":"Elizabeth Charnysh, Sarah McCain, Alexandra Truhlar, Subhamoy Pal, Jonathan M Reader, Kunal Sanghavi, Wendy R Uhlmann, Katherine Hendy, Amy Leader, Drew Blasco, Anya E R Prince, William Gregory Feero, Rachael Brandt, Veda N Giri, Charles Lee, J Scott Roberts","doi":"10.1080/17410541.2025.2515003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study explored employees' understanding of, and psychosocial responses to, workplace genetic testing (wGT) results.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Employees of a US healthcare system who underwent wGT (hereditary cancer/heart disease risk, pharmacogenomics) and received results were surveyed. We ascertained pretest education engagement, test understanding, and psychosocial responses. Regression analyses identified predictors of scores on a modified Feelings About genomiC Test Results questionnaire (positive feelings, negative emotions, and uncertainty after wGT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>N</i> = 418 employees (mean age = 44 years; 88.3% female; 80.6% white) completed the survey. Mean scores (out of 12; higher scores indicate a greater extent of each feeling) were 5.2 (SD = 2.9) for positive feelings, 1.2 (SD = 2.2) for negative emotions, and 2.0 (SD = 2.5) for uncertainty. Identifying as non-Hispanic African American/Black and receiving increased risk (cancer/heart disease) wGT results were associated with lower positive feelings and higher negative emotions and uncertainty scores (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Open-ended responses indicated difficulty interpreting, recalling, and utilizing results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>wGT was associated with low levels of measured psychosocial harm among participants. However, results suggested a greater likelihood of negative psychosocial responses among those with increased risk of cancer/heart disease and non-Hispanic African American/Black employees. Future studies should explore strategies to ensure all employees undergoing wGT have educational and psychosocial support.</p>","PeriodicalId":94167,"journal":{"name":"Personalized medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17410541.2025.2515003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: This study explored employees' understanding of, and psychosocial responses to, workplace genetic testing (wGT) results.
Materials & methods: Employees of a US healthcare system who underwent wGT (hereditary cancer/heart disease risk, pharmacogenomics) and received results were surveyed. We ascertained pretest education engagement, test understanding, and psychosocial responses. Regression analyses identified predictors of scores on a modified Feelings About genomiC Test Results questionnaire (positive feelings, negative emotions, and uncertainty after wGT).
Results: N = 418 employees (mean age = 44 years; 88.3% female; 80.6% white) completed the survey. Mean scores (out of 12; higher scores indicate a greater extent of each feeling) were 5.2 (SD = 2.9) for positive feelings, 1.2 (SD = 2.2) for negative emotions, and 2.0 (SD = 2.5) for uncertainty. Identifying as non-Hispanic African American/Black and receiving increased risk (cancer/heart disease) wGT results were associated with lower positive feelings and higher negative emotions and uncertainty scores (all p < 0.05). Open-ended responses indicated difficulty interpreting, recalling, and utilizing results.
Conclusions: wGT was associated with low levels of measured psychosocial harm among participants. However, results suggested a greater likelihood of negative psychosocial responses among those with increased risk of cancer/heart disease and non-Hispanic African American/Black employees. Future studies should explore strategies to ensure all employees undergoing wGT have educational and psychosocial support.