{"title":"Influence of separator gel in blood sampling tubes for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances analysis.","authors":"Patrice Dufour, Catherine Pirard, Corinne Charlier","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For several years, concerns about perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been growing, and clinical laboratories may have to perform a growing number of PFAS analyses. The use of serum tubes without a separator gel is currently recommended for the quantification of PFAS due to the concern that the compounds may adsorb to the gel. The impact of gel adsorption on the accuracy of the results, however, has not been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Aliquots from a pool of blood spiked with PFAS were stored in gel-free clot activator tubes (CATs) and gel-containing BD SST II Advance tubes (serum separator tubes) for 2, 8, and 24 hours. The CATs and serum separator tubes were collected from 15 volunteers under typical sampling conditions. Concentrations of 16 PFAS were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and the percentage of change in PFAS levels between both tube types was computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed minimal changes (<5%) for most PFAS within 24 hours, except for long-chain perfluorosulfonates (including perfluorooctane sulfonate), which seemed to exhibit adsorption of the gel. In samples from volunteers, the observed changes were statistically significant for perfluorooctane sulfonate (P <.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Based on our analysis, we recommend using CATs to avoid PFAS underestimation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmaf023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: For several years, concerns about perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been growing, and clinical laboratories may have to perform a growing number of PFAS analyses. The use of serum tubes without a separator gel is currently recommended for the quantification of PFAS due to the concern that the compounds may adsorb to the gel. The impact of gel adsorption on the accuracy of the results, however, has not been evaluated.
Methods: Aliquots from a pool of blood spiked with PFAS were stored in gel-free clot activator tubes (CATs) and gel-containing BD SST II Advance tubes (serum separator tubes) for 2, 8, and 24 hours. The CATs and serum separator tubes were collected from 15 volunteers under typical sampling conditions. Concentrations of 16 PFAS were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and the percentage of change in PFAS levels between both tube types was computed.
Results: Results showed minimal changes (<5%) for most PFAS within 24 hours, except for long-chain perfluorosulfonates (including perfluorooctane sulfonate), which seemed to exhibit adsorption of the gel. In samples from volunteers, the observed changes were statistically significant for perfluorooctane sulfonate (P <.001).
Discussion: Based on our analysis, we recommend using CATs to avoid PFAS underestimation.
导读:近年来,人们对全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的关注不断增加,临床实验室可能不得不进行越来越多的PFAS分析。由于担心化合物可能吸附在凝胶上,目前推荐使用血清管而不使用分离凝胶进行PFAS的定量分析。然而,凝胶吸附对结果准确性的影响尚未得到评估。方法:从加入PFAS的血液池中提取等量血液,分别在无凝胶凝块激活管(CATs)和含凝胶BD SST II Advance管(血清分离管)中保存2、8和24小时。在典型的采样条件下,收集了15名志愿者的cat和血清分离管。采用液相色谱-串联质谱法分析16种PFAS的浓度,并计算两种管型之间PFAS水平变化的百分比。结果:结果显示最小的变化(讨论:根据我们的分析,我们建议使用cat来避免PFAS的低估。