Influence of separator gel in blood sampling tubes for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances analysis.

IF 1
Patrice Dufour, Catherine Pirard, Corinne Charlier
{"title":"Influence of separator gel in blood sampling tubes for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances analysis.","authors":"Patrice Dufour, Catherine Pirard, Corinne Charlier","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For several years, concerns about perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been growing, and clinical laboratories may have to perform a growing number of PFAS analyses. The use of serum tubes without a separator gel is currently recommended for the quantification of PFAS due to the concern that the compounds may adsorb to the gel. The impact of gel adsorption on the accuracy of the results, however, has not been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Aliquots from a pool of blood spiked with PFAS were stored in gel-free clot activator tubes (CATs) and gel-containing BD SST II Advance tubes (serum separator tubes) for 2, 8, and 24 hours. The CATs and serum separator tubes were collected from 15 volunteers under typical sampling conditions. Concentrations of 16 PFAS were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and the percentage of change in PFAS levels between both tube types was computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed minimal changes (<5%) for most PFAS within 24 hours, except for long-chain perfluorosulfonates (including perfluorooctane sulfonate), which seemed to exhibit adsorption of the gel. In samples from volunteers, the observed changes were statistically significant for perfluorooctane sulfonate (P <.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Based on our analysis, we recommend using CATs to avoid PFAS underestimation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmaf023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: For several years, concerns about perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been growing, and clinical laboratories may have to perform a growing number of PFAS analyses. The use of serum tubes without a separator gel is currently recommended for the quantification of PFAS due to the concern that the compounds may adsorb to the gel. The impact of gel adsorption on the accuracy of the results, however, has not been evaluated.

Methods: Aliquots from a pool of blood spiked with PFAS were stored in gel-free clot activator tubes (CATs) and gel-containing BD SST II Advance tubes (serum separator tubes) for 2, 8, and 24 hours. The CATs and serum separator tubes were collected from 15 volunteers under typical sampling conditions. Concentrations of 16 PFAS were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and the percentage of change in PFAS levels between both tube types was computed.

Results: Results showed minimal changes (<5%) for most PFAS within 24 hours, except for long-chain perfluorosulfonates (including perfluorooctane sulfonate), which seemed to exhibit adsorption of the gel. In samples from volunteers, the observed changes were statistically significant for perfluorooctane sulfonate (P <.001).

Discussion: Based on our analysis, we recommend using CATs to avoid PFAS underestimation.

分离凝胶对采血管中全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质分析的影响
导读:近年来,人们对全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的关注不断增加,临床实验室可能不得不进行越来越多的PFAS分析。由于担心化合物可能吸附在凝胶上,目前推荐使用血清管而不使用分离凝胶进行PFAS的定量分析。然而,凝胶吸附对结果准确性的影响尚未得到评估。方法:从加入PFAS的血液池中提取等量血液,分别在无凝胶凝块激活管(CATs)和含凝胶BD SST II Advance管(血清分离管)中保存2、8和24小时。在典型的采样条件下,收集了15名志愿者的cat和血清分离管。采用液相色谱-串联质谱法分析16种PFAS的浓度,并计算两种管型之间PFAS水平变化的百分比。结果:结果显示最小的变化(讨论:根据我们的分析,我们建议使用cat来避免PFAS的低估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信