Umbilical analgesic concentrations after labour analgesia with programmed intermittent epidural bolus: a prospective observational study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Arisa Ijuin, Masaki Sato, Nagayoshi Umehara, Shoichiro Amari, Jumpei Saito, Mayuko Abe, Wataru Matsunaga, Yoko Yamashita, Yasuyuki Suzuki, Kenichi Masui
{"title":"Umbilical analgesic concentrations after labour analgesia with programmed intermittent epidural bolus: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Arisa Ijuin, Masaki Sato, Nagayoshi Umehara, Shoichiro Amari, Jumpei Saito, Mayuko Abe, Wataru Matsunaga, Yoko Yamashita, Yasuyuki Suzuki, Kenichi Masui","doi":"10.1007/s12630-025-02975-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The umbilical analgesic concentrations after using programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) without continuous infusion are unknown. We aimed to characterize umbilical ropivacaine and fentanyl concentrations and examine their influence on neonatal conditions at delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively studied 50 parturients with singleton pregnancies who received combined spinal-epidural analgesia using PIEB (7 mL every 45 min) and PCEA (7 mL per bolus; lockout interval: 15 min) with 0.08% ropivacaine and 2 μg·mL<sup>-1</sup> fentanyl, with clinician-administered boluses as necessary. We evaluated the umbilical venous analgesic concentrations and neonatal characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median [interquartile range (IQR)] hourly ropivacaine and fentanyl doses were 13 [11-15] mg·hr<sup>-1</sup> and 39 [30-50] µg·hr<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. The ropivacaine and fentanyl concentrations were 77 [56-98] ng·mL<sup>-1</sup> and 0.125 [0.125-0.20] ng·mL<sup>-1</sup> at delivery, respectively. The umbilical analgesic concentrations were correlated with the labour duration and total dose. In parturients given clinician-administered boluses within 1 hr before delivery, the ropivacaine and fentanyl concentrations were similar to those without (81 [54-104] vs 77 [54-96] ng·mL<sup>-1</sup> and 0.20 [0.125-0.20] vs 0.125 [0.05-0.20] ng·mL<sup>-1</sup>, respectively). The umbilical arterial pH was > 7.2 and the Apgar score at 5 min was ≥ 8 for all neonates. No neonates exhibited systemic local anesthetic toxicity. Respiratory support was required for 14 neonates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Umbilical analgesic concentrations at delivery were low after labour analgesia using a regimen of PIEB with PCEA for up to 19 hr. An intermittent bolus dosing regimen may contribute to a decrease in umbilical analgesic concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02975-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The umbilical analgesic concentrations after using programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) without continuous infusion are unknown. We aimed to characterize umbilical ropivacaine and fentanyl concentrations and examine their influence on neonatal conditions at delivery.

Methods: We prospectively studied 50 parturients with singleton pregnancies who received combined spinal-epidural analgesia using PIEB (7 mL every 45 min) and PCEA (7 mL per bolus; lockout interval: 15 min) with 0.08% ropivacaine and 2 μg·mL-1 fentanyl, with clinician-administered boluses as necessary. We evaluated the umbilical venous analgesic concentrations and neonatal characteristics.

Results: The median [interquartile range (IQR)] hourly ropivacaine and fentanyl doses were 13 [11-15] mg·hr-1 and 39 [30-50] µg·hr-1, respectively. The ropivacaine and fentanyl concentrations were 77 [56-98] ng·mL-1 and 0.125 [0.125-0.20] ng·mL-1 at delivery, respectively. The umbilical analgesic concentrations were correlated with the labour duration and total dose. In parturients given clinician-administered boluses within 1 hr before delivery, the ropivacaine and fentanyl concentrations were similar to those without (81 [54-104] vs 77 [54-96] ng·mL-1 and 0.20 [0.125-0.20] vs 0.125 [0.05-0.20] ng·mL-1, respectively). The umbilical arterial pH was > 7.2 and the Apgar score at 5 min was ≥ 8 for all neonates. No neonates exhibited systemic local anesthetic toxicity. Respiratory support was required for 14 neonates.

Conclusions: Umbilical analgesic concentrations at delivery were low after labour analgesia using a regimen of PIEB with PCEA for up to 19 hr. An intermittent bolus dosing regimen may contribute to a decrease in umbilical analgesic concentrations.

计划性间歇硬膜外灌注分娩镇痛后脐部镇痛浓度:一项前瞻性观察研究。
目的:应用计划性间歇硬膜外输注(PIEB)和患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)不连续输注后脐部镇痛浓度尚不清楚。我们的目的是表征脐带罗哌卡因和芬太尼浓度,并检查它们对分娩时新生儿状况的影响。方法:我们前瞻性研究了50例接受脊髓-硬膜外联合镇痛的单胎妊娠孕妇,使用PIEB(每45分钟7 mL)和PCEA(每丸7 mL;锁止时间:15 min), 0.08%罗哌卡因加2 μg·mL-1芬太尼,必要时给予临床大剂量。我们评估了脐静脉镇痛浓度和新生儿特征。结果:每小时罗哌卡因和芬太尼剂量的中位数[四分位数间距(IQR)]分别为13 [11-15]mg·hr-1和39[30-50]µg·hr-1。给药时罗哌卡因和芬太尼浓度分别为77 [56 ~ 98]ng·mL-1和0.125 [0.125 ~ 0.20]ng·mL-1。脐部镇痛药浓度与产程和总剂量呈正相关。在分娩前1小时内给予临床给药的孕妇,罗哌卡因和芬太尼浓度与未给予的孕妇相似(分别为81[54-104]对77 [54-96]ng·mL-1和0.20[0.125-0.20]对0.125 [0.05-0.20]ng·mL-1)。所有新生儿脐带动脉pH均为bbb7.2, 5 min时Apgar评分均≥8。没有新生儿出现全身局麻毒性。14名新生儿需要呼吸支持。结论:分娩时脐部镇痛浓度较低,使用pib和PCEA方案长达19小时。间歇给药方案可能导致脐带镇痛药浓度的降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信