The potential of time-assistive products to improve daily time management in persons with dementia: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Ann-Christine Persson, Gunnel Janeslätt, Johan Borg, Lena Dahlberg, Kevin J McKee, Monika Löfgren, Marika C Möller
{"title":"The potential of time-assistive products to improve daily time management in persons with dementia: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Ann-Christine Persson, Gunnel Janeslätt, Johan Borg, Lena Dahlberg, Kevin J McKee, Monika Löfgren, Marika C Möller","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2514546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of time-assistive products in supporting persons with mild to moderate dementia to achieve their time-related activity goals given their time processing ability.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multicentre single-blinded randomised controlled intervention study. A total of 73 persons with mild to moderate dementia aged ≥60 years were recruited through memory clinics across Sweden, of which 57 completed the three-month follow-up (intervention group <i>n</i> = 26, waiting list control group <i>n</i> = 31). The intervention group received individually prescribed time-assistive products. The primary outcome measure was the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Comparative analyses were done of the differences in COPM ratings at baseline and after three months within and between groups. KaTid-Senior was used to measure time processing ability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After three months, COPM ratings, adjusted for time processing ability, had significantly improved in the intervention group regarding satisfaction with performance (<i>p</i> = .028, <math><mrow><mrow><msubsup><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow><mi>p</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></mrow></math> = 0.09) but not for performance (<i>p</i> = .053, <math><mrow><mrow><msubsup><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow><mi>p</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></mrow></math> = 0.07). The change from the ratings at baseline to the ratings at 3 months was clinically significant in the intervention group as their improvement exceeded 2 points on a 10-point scale both for performance (mean 2.8, CI 1.8-3.7) and satisfaction with performance (mean 3.4, CI 2.3-4.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prescription of time-assistive products can support persons with mild to moderate dementia in their daily time management in relation to individual time-related goals. However, given the weak evidence base, further research is needed on the effectiveness of time-based assistive products for persons with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2514546","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of time-assistive products in supporting persons with mild to moderate dementia to achieve their time-related activity goals given their time processing ability.

Materials and methods: A multicentre single-blinded randomised controlled intervention study. A total of 73 persons with mild to moderate dementia aged ≥60 years were recruited through memory clinics across Sweden, of which 57 completed the three-month follow-up (intervention group n = 26, waiting list control group n = 31). The intervention group received individually prescribed time-assistive products. The primary outcome measure was the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Comparative analyses were done of the differences in COPM ratings at baseline and after three months within and between groups. KaTid-Senior was used to measure time processing ability.

Results: After three months, COPM ratings, adjusted for time processing ability, had significantly improved in the intervention group regarding satisfaction with performance (p = .028, ηp2 = 0.09) but not for performance (p = .053, ηp2 = 0.07). The change from the ratings at baseline to the ratings at 3 months was clinically significant in the intervention group as their improvement exceeded 2 points on a 10-point scale both for performance (mean 2.8, CI 1.8-3.7) and satisfaction with performance (mean 3.4, CI 2.3-4.6).

Conclusion: Prescription of time-assistive products can support persons with mild to moderate dementia in their daily time management in relation to individual time-related goals. However, given the weak evidence base, further research is needed on the effectiveness of time-based assistive products for persons with dementia.

时间辅助产品改善痴呆患者日常时间管理的潜力:一项随机对照试验。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨时间辅助产品在支持轻度至中度痴呆患者实现其时间相关活动目标方面的作用,考虑到他们的时间处理能力。材料和方法:一项多中心单盲随机对照干预研究。通过瑞典各地的记忆诊所共招募了73名年龄≥60岁的轻度至中度痴呆患者,其中57人完成了为期三个月的随访(干预组n = 26,等候名单对照组n = 31)。干预组接受单独规定的时间辅助产品。主要结果测量是加拿大职业绩效测量(COPM)。比较分析了组内和组间基线时和三个月后COPM评分的差异。采用KaTid-Senior测试时间处理能力。结果:3个月后,干预组经时间处理能力调整后的COPM评分在工作满意度方面有显著提高(p = 0.028, ηp2 = 0.09),但在工作满意度方面无显著提高(p = 0.053, ηp2 = 0.07)。从基线评分到3个月评分的变化在干预组具有临床意义,因为他们的改善在10分制的表现(平均2.8,CI 1.8-3.7)和表现满意度(平均3.4,CI 2.3-4.6)上都超过了2分。结论:处方时间辅助产品可以支持轻度至中度痴呆患者的日常时间管理,与个人时间相关的目标。然而,鉴于证据基础薄弱,需要进一步研究基于时间的辅助产品对痴呆症患者的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信