Validity and Short-Term Repeatability of a Novel Hand-Held Respiratory Health Meter for the Assessment of Dynamic Maximal Respiratory Pressures in Healthy Young Adults.

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2025-06-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S515777
Herkko Ryynänen, Anssi Sovijärvi, Ilpo Kuronen, Essi K Ahokas, Maarit Valtonen, Johanna K Ihalainen, Juhani Multanen
{"title":"Validity and Short-Term Repeatability of a Novel Hand-Held Respiratory Health Meter for the Assessment of Dynamic Maximal Respiratory Pressures in Healthy Young Adults.","authors":"Herkko Ryynänen, Anssi Sovijärvi, Ilpo Kuronen, Essi K Ahokas, Maarit Valtonen, Johanna K Ihalainen, Juhani Multanen","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S515777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Measuring maximal airway pressure is an essential part of the assessment of respiratory functions. Portable handheld devices have made clinical measurements more available, but reliable and user-friendly devices for non-clinical use remain rare. This study sought to determine the validity and short-term repeatability of measurements of dynamic maximal inspiratory pressure (dMIP) and dynamic maximal expiratory pressure (dMEP) by using a novel self-administered respiratory health meter (WellO2-RHM) in asymptomatic young adults.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>dMIP and dMEP were measured with WellO2-RHM in asymptomatic adult volunteers (n=26, 15 male and 11 female, age 26-41 years). These values were compared with quasi-static maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) obtained from the same volunteers using another respiratory manometer (MicroRPM). The measurements of dMIP and dMEP with WellO2-RHM were repeated in the same individuals at an interval of one week for assessment of their short-term repeatability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Pearson correlation coefficients of dMIP and dMEP values with MIP and MEP values were high (r=0.840, p<0.001; r=0.849, p<0.001, respectively). The dMIP and dMEP values were consistently lower than the quasi-static MIP and MEP values in the same individuals. The short-term repeatability of the dMIP and dMEP in one week interval proved to be moderately good in terms of the coefficient of variation (CV), the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the standard error of measurement (SEm) and minimal detectable change (MDC) (10.0%, 0.825, p<0.001, 7 cmH2O and 20 cmH2O and 9.1%, 0.895, p<0.001, 12 cmH2O and 34 cmH2O, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that the WellO2-RHM is a valid and repeatable method for the assessment of dMIP and dMEP in asymptomatic young adults, but the absolute values are lower than those obtained with devices measuring quasi-static MIP and MEP. The findings suggest that WellO2-RHM can be used for self-monitoring of the effects of respiratory muscle training in healthy young adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"297-308"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12151089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S515777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Measuring maximal airway pressure is an essential part of the assessment of respiratory functions. Portable handheld devices have made clinical measurements more available, but reliable and user-friendly devices for non-clinical use remain rare. This study sought to determine the validity and short-term repeatability of measurements of dynamic maximal inspiratory pressure (dMIP) and dynamic maximal expiratory pressure (dMEP) by using a novel self-administered respiratory health meter (WellO2-RHM) in asymptomatic young adults.

Patients and methods: dMIP and dMEP were measured with WellO2-RHM in asymptomatic adult volunteers (n=26, 15 male and 11 female, age 26-41 years). These values were compared with quasi-static maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) obtained from the same volunteers using another respiratory manometer (MicroRPM). The measurements of dMIP and dMEP with WellO2-RHM were repeated in the same individuals at an interval of one week for assessment of their short-term repeatability.

Results: The Pearson correlation coefficients of dMIP and dMEP values with MIP and MEP values were high (r=0.840, p<0.001; r=0.849, p<0.001, respectively). The dMIP and dMEP values were consistently lower than the quasi-static MIP and MEP values in the same individuals. The short-term repeatability of the dMIP and dMEP in one week interval proved to be moderately good in terms of the coefficient of variation (CV), the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the standard error of measurement (SEm) and minimal detectable change (MDC) (10.0%, 0.825, p<0.001, 7 cmH2O and 20 cmH2O and 9.1%, 0.895, p<0.001, 12 cmH2O and 34 cmH2O, respectively).

Conclusion: The results indicate that the WellO2-RHM is a valid and repeatable method for the assessment of dMIP and dMEP in asymptomatic young adults, but the absolute values are lower than those obtained with devices measuring quasi-static MIP and MEP. The findings suggest that WellO2-RHM can be used for self-monitoring of the effects of respiratory muscle training in healthy young adults.

一种新型手持式呼吸健康计评估健康年轻人动态最大呼吸压力的有效性和短期可重复性
目的:测量最大气道压力是评估呼吸功能的重要组成部分。便携式手持设备使临床测量更容易获得,但用于非临床使用的可靠和用户友好的设备仍然很少。本研究旨在通过使用一种新型自我给药呼吸健康计(WellO2-RHM)确定无症状年轻人动态最大吸气压力(dip)和动态最大呼气压力(dMEP)测量的有效性和短期可重复性。患者和方法:采用WellO2-RHM检测无症状成年志愿者(26例,男性15例,女性11例,年龄26-41岁)的dip和dMEP。这些值与准静态最大吸气压力(MIP)和最大呼气压力(MEP)进行比较,这些数据是由同一志愿者使用另一种呼吸压力计(MicroRPM)获得的。用WellO2-RHM在同一个体中每隔一周重复测量dip和dMEP,以评估其短期可重复性。结果:dip和dMEP值与MIP和MEP值的Pearson相关系数较高(r=0.840)。结论:WellO2-RHM是一种有效的、可重复的评估无症状青年dip和dMEP的方法,但绝对值低于准静态MIP和MEP测量装置。研究结果表明,WellO2-RHM可用于健康年轻人呼吸肌肉训练效果的自我监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信