Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Neurosurgery for Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Health Technology Assessment.

Q1 Medicine
Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series Pub Date : 2025-05-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01
{"title":"Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound Neurosurgery for Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Health Technology Assessment.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating neuropsychiatric illness characterized by obsessions and compulsions that are distressing, impair function, and are time-consuming, especially in severe cases. Up to 40% of people with OCD have treatment-refractory OCD and experience inadequate response to multiple trials and combinations of treatments. Neurosurgery is an important treatment option for people with severe, treatment-refractory OCD but is typically invasive. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a noninvasive technology that is used to perform neurosurgery. We conducted a health technology assessment of MRgFUS neurosurgery for people with severe, treatment-refractory OCD, which included an evaluation of effectiveness, safety, the budget impact of publicly funding MRgFUS neurosurgery, and patient preferences and values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence published since 2013. We assessed the risk of bias of each included study using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series, and the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We performed a systematic literature search of the economic evidence. We estimated the 5-year budget impact of publicly funding MRgFUS neurosurgery for people with treatment-refractory OCD in Ontario. Owing to a lack of comparative clinical evidence, we did not conduct a primary economic evaluation. To contextualize the value of MRgFUS neurosurgery, we spoke to people with treatment-refractory OCD who underwent the procedure, as well as those on the waitlist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2 studies in the clinical evidence review. In these small case series, MRgFUS neurosurgery led to improvements in OCD symptoms, quality of life, and patient functioning, as well as treatment response for many but not all patients (GRADE: Very low). In a minority of cases, the procedure could not be successfully performed due to skull factors (GRADE: Very low). MRgFUS neurosurgery was also found to have a favourable safety profile (GRADE: Very low). No cases of re-treatment were reported (GRADE: Very low). No studies compared MRgFUS neurosurgery with other neurosurgeries.Due to the lack of comparative clinical evidence, the cost-effectiveness of MRgFUS neurosurgery could not be determined. Our budget impact analysis found that publicly funding MRgFUS neurosurgery for people with treatment-refractory OCD in Ontario would cost an additional $1.9 million over 5 years.Patients reported the negative impacts that OCD had on their day-to-day activities, work and school, social life and family relationships, and mental health. The 6 participants who underwent MRgFUS neurosurgery commented on the positive impact that it had on their OCD symptoms, mental health, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRgFUS neurosurgery may be an effective and generally safe treatment option for severe, treatment-refractory OCD, but the evidence is very uncertain. The cost-effectiveness of MRgFUS neurosurgery could not be determined given the lack of comparative clinical evidence. Publicly funding MRgFUS neurosurgery for people with treatment-refractory OCD in Ontario would result in an additional cost of $1.9 million over 5 years. Patients and care partners emphasized the negative impact of OCD in their lives and highlighted the importance of having access to MRgFUS neurosurgery as a treatment option for treatment-refractory OCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":39160,"journal":{"name":"Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series","volume":"25 1","pages":"1-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating neuropsychiatric illness characterized by obsessions and compulsions that are distressing, impair function, and are time-consuming, especially in severe cases. Up to 40% of people with OCD have treatment-refractory OCD and experience inadequate response to multiple trials and combinations of treatments. Neurosurgery is an important treatment option for people with severe, treatment-refractory OCD but is typically invasive. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a noninvasive technology that is used to perform neurosurgery. We conducted a health technology assessment of MRgFUS neurosurgery for people with severe, treatment-refractory OCD, which included an evaluation of effectiveness, safety, the budget impact of publicly funding MRgFUS neurosurgery, and patient preferences and values.

Methods: We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence published since 2013. We assessed the risk of bias of each included study using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series, and the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We performed a systematic literature search of the economic evidence. We estimated the 5-year budget impact of publicly funding MRgFUS neurosurgery for people with treatment-refractory OCD in Ontario. Owing to a lack of comparative clinical evidence, we did not conduct a primary economic evaluation. To contextualize the value of MRgFUS neurosurgery, we spoke to people with treatment-refractory OCD who underwent the procedure, as well as those on the waitlist.

Results: We included 2 studies in the clinical evidence review. In these small case series, MRgFUS neurosurgery led to improvements in OCD symptoms, quality of life, and patient functioning, as well as treatment response for many but not all patients (GRADE: Very low). In a minority of cases, the procedure could not be successfully performed due to skull factors (GRADE: Very low). MRgFUS neurosurgery was also found to have a favourable safety profile (GRADE: Very low). No cases of re-treatment were reported (GRADE: Very low). No studies compared MRgFUS neurosurgery with other neurosurgeries.Due to the lack of comparative clinical evidence, the cost-effectiveness of MRgFUS neurosurgery could not be determined. Our budget impact analysis found that publicly funding MRgFUS neurosurgery for people with treatment-refractory OCD in Ontario would cost an additional $1.9 million over 5 years.Patients reported the negative impacts that OCD had on their day-to-day activities, work and school, social life and family relationships, and mental health. The 6 participants who underwent MRgFUS neurosurgery commented on the positive impact that it had on their OCD symptoms, mental health, and quality of life.

Conclusions: MRgFUS neurosurgery may be an effective and generally safe treatment option for severe, treatment-refractory OCD, but the evidence is very uncertain. The cost-effectiveness of MRgFUS neurosurgery could not be determined given the lack of comparative clinical evidence. Publicly funding MRgFUS neurosurgery for people with treatment-refractory OCD in Ontario would result in an additional cost of $1.9 million over 5 years. Patients and care partners emphasized the negative impact of OCD in their lives and highlighted the importance of having access to MRgFUS neurosurgery as a treatment option for treatment-refractory OCD.

磁共振引导聚焦超声神经外科治疗难治性强迫症:一项健康技术评估。
背景:强迫症(OCD)是一种使人衰弱的神经精神疾病,其特征是强迫和强迫是痛苦的,损害功能,并且耗时,特别是在严重的情况下。高达40%的强迫症患者患有难治性强迫症,并且对多次试验和联合治疗的反应不足。神经外科手术是重度难治性强迫症患者的重要治疗选择,但通常是侵入性的。磁共振引导聚焦超声(MRgFUS)是一种用于神经外科手术的非侵入性技术。我们对重度难治性强迫症患者的MRgFUS神经外科手术进行了一项健康技术评估,包括对有效性、安全性、公共资助MRgFUS神经外科手术的预算影响以及患者偏好和价值观的评估。方法:对2013年以来发表的临床证据进行系统文献检索。我们使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的病例系列关键评估清单评估了每个纳入研究的偏倚风险,并根据建议评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)工作组标准评估了证据体的质量。我们对经济证据进行了系统的文献检索。我们估计了安大略省对难治性强迫症患者进行MRgFUS神经外科手术的5年预算影响。由于缺乏比较临床证据,我们没有进行初步的经济评估。为了了解MRgFUS神经外科手术的价值,我们采访了接受该手术的难治性强迫症患者,以及那些在等待名单上的患者。结果:我们纳入了2项临床证据综述。在这些小病例系列中,MRgFUS神经外科手术改善了许多但不是所有患者的强迫症症状、生活质量和患者功能,以及治疗反应(GRADE: Very low)。在少数病例中,由于颅骨因素,手术不能成功进行(评分:非常低)。MRgFUS神经外科手术也具有良好的安全性(GRADE: Very low)。无再治疗病例报告(分级:非常低)。没有研究将MRgFUS神经外科手术与其他神经外科手术进行比较。由于缺乏比较的临床证据,MRgFUS神经外科手术的成本-效果无法确定。我们的预算影响分析发现,在安大略省为难治性强迫症患者提供MRgFUS神经外科手术的公共资金将在5年内额外花费190万美元。患者报告说,强迫症对他们的日常活动、工作和学习、社会生活和家庭关系以及心理健康产生了负面影响。6名接受MRgFUS神经外科手术的参与者评论了它对他们的强迫症症状、心理健康和生活质量的积极影响。结论:MRgFUS神经外科手术可能是一种有效且通常安全的治疗选择,治疗严重的难治性强迫症,但证据非常不确定。由于缺乏比较临床证据,MRgFUS神经外科手术的成本效益无法确定。在安大略省,对难治性强迫症患者进行MRgFUS神经外科手术的公共资助将在5年内导致190万美元的额外费用。患者和护理伙伴强调了强迫症对他们生活的负面影响,并强调了MRgFUS神经外科手术作为治疗难治性强迫症的治疗选择的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series
Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信