Evaluating Disposable Isolation Gown Liquid Barrier Test Methods for Relevance to Healthcare.

Q4 Medicine
Karen Haberland, Julie Miller, James Davis, Mukui Mutunga, Jeremy Suggs
{"title":"Evaluating Disposable Isolation Gown Liquid Barrier Test Methods for Relevance to Healthcare.","authors":"Karen Haberland, Julie Miller, James Davis, Mukui Mutunga, Jeremy Suggs","doi":"10.2345/0899-8205-59.1.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare staff rely on isolation gowns to provide a degree of protection against cross contamination from blood or body fluids. Gowns that meet standardized liquid barrier penetration test methods provide staff with a presumed assurance of safety. However, these test methods-namely impact penetration and resistance to hydrostatic pressure-were not drafted with personal protective equipment in mind and therefore may be inappropriate for testing products intended for use in a healthcare environment. This study found that adjusting testing parameters to better simulate clinical conditions altered the measured performance outcomes of the gowns. Specifically, increasing the temperature of the gown material's preconditioning environment or test liquid resulted in statistically significant variations in results. Further, although hydrostatic pressure resistance is measured by the appearance of a third liquid droplet on the inner surface of the gown material, the first two droplets appeared at significantly lower pressures and likely would constitute contamination of healthcare staff. The results indicated that current isolation gown test protocols and regulations should be reevaluated to more accurately reflect healthcare scenarios and improve alignment with expected barrier performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":35656,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","volume":"59 1","pages":"108-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12154863/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-59.1.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare staff rely on isolation gowns to provide a degree of protection against cross contamination from blood or body fluids. Gowns that meet standardized liquid barrier penetration test methods provide staff with a presumed assurance of safety. However, these test methods-namely impact penetration and resistance to hydrostatic pressure-were not drafted with personal protective equipment in mind and therefore may be inappropriate for testing products intended for use in a healthcare environment. This study found that adjusting testing parameters to better simulate clinical conditions altered the measured performance outcomes of the gowns. Specifically, increasing the temperature of the gown material's preconditioning environment or test liquid resulted in statistically significant variations in results. Further, although hydrostatic pressure resistance is measured by the appearance of a third liquid droplet on the inner surface of the gown material, the first two droplets appeared at significantly lower pressures and likely would constitute contamination of healthcare staff. The results indicated that current isolation gown test protocols and regulations should be reevaluated to more accurately reflect healthcare scenarios and improve alignment with expected barrier performance.

评价与卫生保健相关的一次性隔离袍液体屏障试验方法。
医护人员依靠隔离衣提供一定程度的保护,防止血液或体液的交叉污染。符合标准化液体屏障渗透测试方法的防护服为工作人员提供了假定的安全保证。然而,这些测试方法——即冲击穿透和抗静水压力——并没有考虑到个人防护设备,因此可能不适合测试医疗环境中使用的产品。本研究发现,调整测试参数以更好地模拟临床条件改变了隔离衣的测量性能结果。具体来说,提高长袍材料的预处理环境或测试液体的温度会导致统计上显著的结果变化。此外,尽管静压阻力是通过长袍材料内表面出现第三个液滴来测量的,但前两个液滴出现的压力明显较低,可能会对医护人员造成污染。结果表明,目前的隔离袍测试方案和法规应重新评估,以更准确地反映医疗保健情景,并改善与预期屏障性能的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: AAMI publishes Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology (BI&T) a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the developers, managers, and users of medical instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信