Reintervention After Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy for Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Suprabhat Giri, Bhavik Shah, Jimmy Narayan, Radhika Chavan, Viswanath R Donapati, Shivam Khare, Jijo Varghese, Bipadabhanjan Mallick, Aditya Kale, Sridhar Sundaram
{"title":"Reintervention After Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy for Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction.","authors":"Suprabhat Giri, Bhavik Shah, Jimmy Narayan, Radhika Chavan, Viswanath R Donapati, Shivam Khare, Jijo Varghese, Bipadabhanjan Mallick, Aditya Kale, Sridhar Sundaram","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies analyzing the factors associated with reintervention after endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) are limited. We aimed to analyze the incidence and predictors of reintervention in patients with malignant biliary obstruction undergoing EUS-CDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction undergoing EUS-CDS from 8 tertiary care centers in India. The study's primary outcome was reintervention due to stent migration or blockage. The secondary outcomes included clinical success and adverse events. Multivariate analysis using the logistic regression model was used to identify the independent predictors of reintervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 134 patients were included in the study. The technical and clinical success rates were 97.8% (131/134) and 93.9% (123/131), respectively. Periprocedural adverse events (AE) were seen in 6% (8/134) cases. Over a median follow-up of 20 weeks, reintervention was required in 8.4% of the cases after a median interval of 11 weeks. On multivariate analysis, cholangitis at presentation (odds ratio [OR] 6.26) and the absence of coaxial stent with concomitant duodenal stent (OR: 7.41) were independent predictors of reintervention in the overall cohort. On subgroup analysis of patients undergoing EUS-CDS with self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS), the absence of a coaxial stent with concomitant duodenal stent (OR: 10.15) was an independent predictor of reintervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reintervention on follow-up after EUS-CDS is required in around 8.4% of cases. The absence of coaxial stent with concomitant duodenal stent was an independent predictor of reintervention in the overall cohort as well as in those undergoing EUS-CDS with SEMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001382","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Studies analyzing the factors associated with reintervention after endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) are limited. We aimed to analyze the incidence and predictors of reintervention in patients with malignant biliary obstruction undergoing EUS-CDS.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction undergoing EUS-CDS from 8 tertiary care centers in India. The study's primary outcome was reintervention due to stent migration or blockage. The secondary outcomes included clinical success and adverse events. Multivariate analysis using the logistic regression model was used to identify the independent predictors of reintervention.

Results: A total of 134 patients were included in the study. The technical and clinical success rates were 97.8% (131/134) and 93.9% (123/131), respectively. Periprocedural adverse events (AE) were seen in 6% (8/134) cases. Over a median follow-up of 20 weeks, reintervention was required in 8.4% of the cases after a median interval of 11 weeks. On multivariate analysis, cholangitis at presentation (odds ratio [OR] 6.26) and the absence of coaxial stent with concomitant duodenal stent (OR: 7.41) were independent predictors of reintervention in the overall cohort. On subgroup analysis of patients undergoing EUS-CDS with self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS), the absence of a coaxial stent with concomitant duodenal stent (OR: 10.15) was an independent predictor of reintervention.

Conclusion: Reintervention on follow-up after EUS-CDS is required in around 8.4% of cases. The absence of coaxial stent with concomitant duodenal stent was an independent predictor of reintervention in the overall cohort as well as in those undergoing EUS-CDS with SEMS.

超声内镜引导下胆总管十二指肠吻合术治疗远端恶性胆道梗阻的再干预。
导言:内镜超声(EUS)引导下胆总管十二指肠吻合术(CDS)术后再干预相关因素分析研究有限。我们的目的是分析恶性胆道梗阻患者行EUS-CDS再干预的发生率和预测因素。方法:回顾性分析印度8个三级医疗中心恶性胆道远端梗阻行EUS-CDS的患者资料。该研究的主要结果是由于支架移动或堵塞而再次干预。次要结局包括临床成功和不良事件。采用logistic回归模型进行多因素分析,确定再干预的独立预测因素。结果:共纳入134例患者。技术成功率97.8%(131/134),临床成功率93.9%(123/131)。围手术期不良事件(AE)发生率为6%(8/134)。在20周的中位随访中,8.4%的病例在11周的中位间隔后需要再次干预。在多因素分析中,在整个队列中,出现胆管炎(优势比[OR] 6.26)和没有同轴支架合并十二指肠支架(OR: 7.41)是再干预的独立预测因素。在自体扩张金属支架(SEMS) EUS-CDS患者的亚组分析中,没有同轴支架合并十二指肠支架(OR: 10.15)是再干预的独立预测因子。结论:约8.4%的EUS-CDS术后需要再干预。在整个队列以及接受EUS-CDS合并SEMS的患者中,同轴支架合并十二指肠支架的缺失是再干预的独立预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信