Best Practices for Communicating Nutrition and Brain Health Science.

Q3 Nursing
Nutrition Today Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1097/NT.0000000000000744
Lauren B Roberson, Marie E Latulippe, Sarah D Ohlhorst, Dieyenaba Faye, Kristien Aarts, Alison L Steiber, Guylaine Ferland, Timothy Coetzee, Lindsay Chura, Emily H Ho
{"title":"Best Practices for Communicating Nutrition and Brain Health Science.","authors":"Lauren B Roberson, Marie E Latulippe, Sarah D Ohlhorst, Dieyenaba Faye, Kristien Aarts, Alison L Steiber, Guylaine Ferland, Timothy Coetzee, Lindsay Chura, Emily H Ho","doi":"10.1097/NT.0000000000000744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The state of the science of nutrition and its relationship to brain health is complex, making dissemination of research findings difficult. One contributing factor is the lack of a consensus on defining brain health. Some organizations emphasize cognitive function (eg, memory, perception, judgment, decline, impairment) and/or the presence of dementia, whereas others use a broader conceptualization to include mood and stress. Regarding nutrition, some studies support specific dietary patterns, such as the MIND (Mediterranean-Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay) diet, for preserving cognitive function. Others find no effect. Public-facing organizations communicate this science in varying ways to meet consumer and patient needs and interest in preserving brain function as they age. Some organizations have standardized communication methods, whereas others communicate based on topics most salient to the consumer or patient, regardless of the strength of the evidence. This conceptual article reflects a roundtable discussion among stakeholders to document processes for communicating the state of the science to inform best practices moving forward. Six best practices are offered to ensure consistent, evidence-based communication, which is vital in the digital age where misinformation is pervasive.</p>","PeriodicalId":19386,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Today","volume":"60 2","pages":"74-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12147745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NT.0000000000000744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The state of the science of nutrition and its relationship to brain health is complex, making dissemination of research findings difficult. One contributing factor is the lack of a consensus on defining brain health. Some organizations emphasize cognitive function (eg, memory, perception, judgment, decline, impairment) and/or the presence of dementia, whereas others use a broader conceptualization to include mood and stress. Regarding nutrition, some studies support specific dietary patterns, such as the MIND (Mediterranean-Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay) diet, for preserving cognitive function. Others find no effect. Public-facing organizations communicate this science in varying ways to meet consumer and patient needs and interest in preserving brain function as they age. Some organizations have standardized communication methods, whereas others communicate based on topics most salient to the consumer or patient, regardless of the strength of the evidence. This conceptual article reflects a roundtable discussion among stakeholders to document processes for communicating the state of the science to inform best practices moving forward. Six best practices are offered to ensure consistent, evidence-based communication, which is vital in the digital age where misinformation is pervasive.

传达营养和大脑健康科学的最佳实践。
营养科学的现状及其与大脑健康的关系是复杂的,这使得研究成果的传播变得困难。其中一个原因是对大脑健康的定义缺乏共识。一些组织强调认知功能(如记忆、感知、判断、衰退、损伤)和/或痴呆的存在,而另一些组织则使用更广泛的概念,包括情绪和压力。关于营养,一些研究支持特定的饮食模式,如MIND(地中海饮食方法停止高血压干预神经退行性延迟)饮食,以保持认知功能。也有人认为没有效果。面向公众的组织以不同的方式传播这一科学,以满足消费者和患者在年老时保持大脑功能的需求和兴趣。一些组织有标准化的沟通方法,而另一些组织则根据对消费者或患者最重要的主题进行沟通,而不考虑证据的强度。这篇概念性文章反映了利益相关者之间的圆桌讨论,以记录交流科学状况的过程,为未来的最佳实践提供信息。本文提供了六种最佳做法,以确保一致的、基于证据的沟通,这在错误信息普遍存在的数字时代至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition Today
Nutrition Today Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: An established journal for over 40 years, Nutrition Today publishes articles by leading nutritionists and scientists who endorse scientifically sound food, diet and nutritional practices. It helps nutrition professionals clear a pathway through today"s maze of fad diets and cure-all claims. Lively review articles cover the most current and controversial topics, such as the role of dietary fiber in cancer, as well as news about people, meetings, and other events that affect the field. The journal features solicited and submitted original articles, reviews of nutrition research findings, and summaries of symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信