Radiomics and Deep Learning as Important Techniques of Artificial Intelligence - Diagnosing Perspectives in Cytokeratin 19 Positive Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2025-06-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHC.S526887
Fei Wang, Chunyue Yan, Xinlan Huang, Jiqiang He, Ming Yang, Deqiang Xian
{"title":"Radiomics and Deep Learning as Important Techniques of Artificial Intelligence - Diagnosing Perspectives in Cytokeratin 19 Positive Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"Fei Wang, Chunyue Yan, Xinlan Huang, Jiqiang He, Ming Yang, Deqiang Xian","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S526887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, there are inconsistencies among different studies on preoperative prediction of Cytokeratin 19 (CK19) expression in HCC using traditional imaging, radiomics, and deep learning. We aimed to systematically analyze and compare the performance of non-invasive methods for predicting CK19-positive HCC, thereby providing insights for the stratified management of HCC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2025. Two investigators independently screened and extracted data based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible studies were included, and key findings were summarized in tables to provide a clear overview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ultimately, 22 studies involving 3395 HCC patients were included. 72.7% (16/22) focused on traditional imaging, 36.4% (8/22) on radiomics, 9.1% (2/22) on deep learning, and 54.5% (12/22) on combined models. The magnetic resonance imaging was the most commonly used imaging modality (19/22), and over half of the studies (12/22) were published between 2022 and 2025. Moreover, 27.3% (6/22) were multicenter studies, 36.4% (8/22) included a validation set, and only 13.6% (3/22) were prospective. The area under the curve (AUC) range of using clinical and traditional imaging was 0.560 to 0.917. The AUC ranges of radiomics were 0.648 to 0.951, and the AUC ranges of deep learning were 0.718 to 0.820. Notably, the AUC ranges of combined models of clinical, imaging, radiomics and deep learning were 0.614 to 0.995. Nevertheless, the multicenter external data were limited, with only 13.6% (3/22) incorporating validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined model integrating traditional imaging, radiomics and deep learning achieves excellent potential and performance for predicting CK19 in HCC. Based on current limitations, future research should focus on building an easy-to-use dynamic online tool, combining multicenter-multimodal imaging and advanced deep learning approaches to enhance the accuracy and robustness of model predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"12 ","pages":"1129-1140"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S526887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently, there are inconsistencies among different studies on preoperative prediction of Cytokeratin 19 (CK19) expression in HCC using traditional imaging, radiomics, and deep learning. We aimed to systematically analyze and compare the performance of non-invasive methods for predicting CK19-positive HCC, thereby providing insights for the stratified management of HCC patients.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2025. Two investigators independently screened and extracted data based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible studies were included, and key findings were summarized in tables to provide a clear overview.

Results: Ultimately, 22 studies involving 3395 HCC patients were included. 72.7% (16/22) focused on traditional imaging, 36.4% (8/22) on radiomics, 9.1% (2/22) on deep learning, and 54.5% (12/22) on combined models. The magnetic resonance imaging was the most commonly used imaging modality (19/22), and over half of the studies (12/22) were published between 2022 and 2025. Moreover, 27.3% (6/22) were multicenter studies, 36.4% (8/22) included a validation set, and only 13.6% (3/22) were prospective. The area under the curve (AUC) range of using clinical and traditional imaging was 0.560 to 0.917. The AUC ranges of radiomics were 0.648 to 0.951, and the AUC ranges of deep learning were 0.718 to 0.820. Notably, the AUC ranges of combined models of clinical, imaging, radiomics and deep learning were 0.614 to 0.995. Nevertheless, the multicenter external data were limited, with only 13.6% (3/22) incorporating validation.

Conclusion: The combined model integrating traditional imaging, radiomics and deep learning achieves excellent potential and performance for predicting CK19 in HCC. Based on current limitations, future research should focus on building an easy-to-use dynamic online tool, combining multicenter-multimodal imaging and advanced deep learning approaches to enhance the accuracy and robustness of model predictions.

放射组学和深度学习作为人工智能的重要技术——细胞角蛋白19阳性肝细胞癌的诊断前景。
背景:目前,利用传统影像学、放射组学、深度学习等方法预测HCC细胞角蛋白19 (Cytokeratin 19, CK19)术前表达的不同研究存在不一致性。我们旨在系统地分析和比较无创方法预测ck19阳性HCC的性能,从而为HCC患者的分层管理提供见解。方法:综合检索PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane Library自成立至2025年2月的文献。两名研究者根据纳入和排除标准独立筛选和提取数据。纳入了符合条件的研究,并在表格中总结了主要发现,以提供清晰的概述。结果:最终纳入22项研究,涉及3395例HCC患者。72.7%(16/22)关注传统影像学,36.4%(8/22)关注放射组学,9.1%(2/22)关注深度学习,54.5%(12/22)关注组合模型。磁共振成像是最常用的成像方式(19/22),超过一半的研究(12/22)发表于2022年至2025年之间。27.3%(6/22)为多中心研究,36.4%(8/22)为验证集,仅有13.6%(3/22)为前瞻性研究。临床与传统影像学的曲线下面积(AUC)范围为0.560 ~ 0.917。放射组学的AUC范围为0.648 ~ 0.951,深度学习的AUC范围为0.718 ~ 0.820。值得注意的是,临床、影像学、放射组学和深度学习联合模型的AUC范围为0.614 ~ 0.995。然而,多中心外部数据有限,只有13.6%(3/22)纳入验证。结论:结合传统影像学、放射组学和深度学习的联合模型在HCC中预测CK19具有良好的潜力和性能。基于目前的限制,未来的研究应侧重于建立一个易于使用的动态在线工具,结合多中心多模态成像和先进的深度学习方法,以提高模型预测的准确性和鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信