Fertility preservation and in vitro fertilization (IVF) success rates after cancer.

IF 4.1 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Chelsea Anderson, Alexis C Wardell, Allison M Deal, Jennifer E Mersereau, Katie Cameron, Steven D Spandorfer, Valerie L Baker, Sara Mitra, Jianwen Cai, Barbara Luke, Hazel B Nichols
{"title":"Fertility preservation and in vitro fertilization (IVF) success rates after cancer.","authors":"Chelsea Anderson, Alexis C Wardell, Allison M Deal, Jennifer E Mersereau, Katie Cameron, Steven D Spandorfer, Valerie L Baker, Sara Mitra, Jianwen Cai, Barbara Luke, Hazel B Nichols","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence of the success of in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures is critical for informed decision making before and after cancer treatment. We compared IVF outcomes between women with and without cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from a national IVF database-the Society for Assisted Reproductive Clinic Outcomes Reporting System, linked to statewide cancer registries and birth certificates in 9 states-we identified women who initiated IVF after a cancer diagnosis. Fertility preservation was defined as oocyte retrieval ≤90 days after cancer diagnosis, and IVF after cancer treatment as retrieval >90 days postdiagnosis. Number of oocytes retrieved and conception and livebirth rates were compared between these groups and a comparison group of women without cancer in couples with male factor infertility only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with retrievals for male factor infertility only (n = 81 370), the number of oocytes retrieved was not significantly different for women who underwent retrieval for fertility preservation (n = 2941) but was significantly lower for women who underwent retrievals after cancer treatment (n = 2479) (mean difference = -2.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -3.40 to 2.59). Rate of conception as a function of transfer attempts and likelihood of livebirth after conception also did not significantly differ for fertility preservation (n = 291) compared with male factor infertility only (n = 34 410). Women with IVF after cancer treatment (n = 672) had a lower rate of conception (hazard ratio = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.79) but a similar overall likelihood of a livebirth after conception, relative to the group with male factor infertility only.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IVF outcomes may be maximized when ovarian retrieval is initiated before cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12249167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence of the success of in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures is critical for informed decision making before and after cancer treatment. We compared IVF outcomes between women with and without cancer.

Methods: Using data from a national IVF database-the Society for Assisted Reproductive Clinic Outcomes Reporting System, linked to statewide cancer registries and birth certificates in 9 states-we identified women who initiated IVF after a cancer diagnosis. Fertility preservation was defined as oocyte retrieval ≤90 days after cancer diagnosis, and IVF after cancer treatment as retrieval >90 days postdiagnosis. Number of oocytes retrieved and conception and livebirth rates were compared between these groups and a comparison group of women without cancer in couples with male factor infertility only.

Results: Compared with retrievals for male factor infertility only (n = 81 370), the number of oocytes retrieved was not significantly different for women who underwent retrieval for fertility preservation (n = 2941) but was significantly lower for women who underwent retrievals after cancer treatment (n = 2479) (mean difference = -2.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -3.40 to 2.59). Rate of conception as a function of transfer attempts and likelihood of livebirth after conception also did not significantly differ for fertility preservation (n = 291) compared with male factor infertility only (n = 34 410). Women with IVF after cancer treatment (n = 672) had a lower rate of conception (hazard ratio = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.79) but a similar overall likelihood of a livebirth after conception, relative to the group with male factor infertility only.

Conclusion: IVF outcomes may be maximized when ovarian retrieval is initiated before cancer treatment.

Abstract Image

癌症后的生育能力保存和体外受精(IVF)成功率。
背景:体外受精(IVF)手术成功的证据对于癌症治疗前后的知情决策至关重要。我们比较了患有癌症和没有癌症的女性的体外受精结果。方法:使用来自国家试管婴儿数据库的数据,辅助生殖临床结果报告系统,与9个州的全州癌症登记和出生证明相关联,我们确定了在癌症诊断后开始试管婴儿的妇女。保留生育能力定义为癌症诊断后90天以内的卵母细胞恢复,癌症治疗后的IVF为诊断后90天以内的卵母细胞恢复。将这两组妇女的卵母细胞数量、受孕率和活产率与仅有男性因素不育的夫妇中未患癌症的妇女的对照组进行比较。结果:与仅因男性因素导致不孕的女性(N = 81370)相比,为保留生育能力而进行取出的女性(N = 2941)取出的卵母细胞数量无显著差异,但癌症治疗后进行取出的女性(N = 2479)取出的卵母细胞数量显著减少(平均差异=-2.99;95% ci: -3.40-2.59)。与男性因素不育(N = 34,410)相比,受孕率作为移植尝试的函数和受孕后活产的可能性在生育能力保存方面也没有显著差异(N = 291)。癌症治疗后接受体外受精的妇女(N = 672)受孕率较低(风险比= 0.70;95% CI: 0.61-0.79),但与男性因素不育组相比,受孕后活产的总体可能性相似。结论:在癌症治疗前进行卵巢摘除可使体外受精效果最大化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信