{"title":"Impact of second-line combination chemotherapy on post-progression survival in metastatic and recurrent pancreatic cancer.","authors":"Takafumi Mie, Masato Ozaka, Takeshi Okamoto, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Yoichiro Sato, Tatsuki Hirai, Takahiro Ishitsuka, Yuri Maegawa, Takaaki Furukawa, Yukari Suzuki, Takashi Sasaki, Naoki Sasahira","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02796-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the second-line combination chemotherapy (CC) for patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer, who received second-line chemotherapy after disease progression on first-line modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) or gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel (GnP) between January 2014 and March 2023 at our hospital. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and post-progression survival (PPS) were compared between first-line mFFX and GnP. In addition, OS, PFS, and PPS for second-line treatment with CC and single-agent chemotherapy (SAC) were compared using propensity score matching (PSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>457 patients (mFFX/GnP: 122/335) were included. Median OS and PPS of mFFX and GnP were 15.5 months vs. 15.0 months (p = 0.73) and 7.7 months vs. 7.2 months (p = 0.37), respectively. After PSM, median OS and median PPS were significantly longer in the CC group than in the SAC group (OS: 16.3 months vs. 12.8 months, p < 0.01; PPS: 8.0 months vs. 5.5 months, p < 0.01). There was no difference in first-line PFS between the two groups (7.1 months vs. 6.4 months, p = 0.74). Performance status at the beginning of first-line treatment, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level, Glasgow prognostic score at the end of first-line treatment, and second-line CC were independently associated with OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Second-line CC achieved longer PPS and OS than SAC. To improve OS, it was important to receive second-line CC.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1610-1620"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02796-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the second-line combination chemotherapy (CC) for patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer, who received second-line chemotherapy after disease progression on first-line modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) or gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel (GnP) between January 2014 and March 2023 at our hospital. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and post-progression survival (PPS) were compared between first-line mFFX and GnP. In addition, OS, PFS, and PPS for second-line treatment with CC and single-agent chemotherapy (SAC) were compared using propensity score matching (PSM).
Results: 457 patients (mFFX/GnP: 122/335) were included. Median OS and PPS of mFFX and GnP were 15.5 months vs. 15.0 months (p = 0.73) and 7.7 months vs. 7.2 months (p = 0.37), respectively. After PSM, median OS and median PPS were significantly longer in the CC group than in the SAC group (OS: 16.3 months vs. 12.8 months, p < 0.01; PPS: 8.0 months vs. 5.5 months, p < 0.01). There was no difference in first-line PFS between the two groups (7.1 months vs. 6.4 months, p = 0.74). Performance status at the beginning of first-line treatment, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level, Glasgow prognostic score at the end of first-line treatment, and second-line CC were independently associated with OS.
Conclusion: Second-line CC achieved longer PPS and OS than SAC. To improve OS, it was important to receive second-line CC.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.