Intraoperative Venous Injury During Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Complications.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Henry Avetisian, Camille Flynn, Rakhi Banerjee, Vivek Satish, Joshua Davood, William Karakash, Matthew C Gallo, Mirbahador Athari, Gregory A Magee, Jeffrey C Wang, Raymond J Hah, Ram Alluri
{"title":"Intraoperative Venous Injury During Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Complications.","authors":"Henry Avetisian, Camille Flynn, Rakhi Banerjee, Vivek Satish, Joshua Davood, William Karakash, Matthew C Gallo, Mirbahador Athari, Gregory A Magee, Jeffrey C Wang, Raymond J Hah, Ram Alluri","doi":"10.1177/21925682251350942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and complications associated with intraoperative venous injury during anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).MethodsThis retrospective review included patients who underwent one- to four-level ALIF at an academic spine center. Patients <18 years old or those with surgical indications for trauma, infection, or malignancy were excluded. Patients were stratified by the presence of venous laceration requiring primary suture repair. Comparative analyses were performed using Student's <i>t</i> test and Pearson's Chi-squared test. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors and postoperative complications.ResultsAmong 554 patients, 92 (16.61%) sustained a venous laceration. Independent predictors included age (aOR: 1.03, <i>P</i> < 0.01), chronic kidney disease (aOR: 5.17, <i>P</i> < 0.01), ALIF at L4-5 (aOR: 3.88, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and two-level ALIF (aOR: 1.70, <i>P</i> < 0.01). ALIF at L5-S1 was protective (aOR: 0.24, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Venous laceration was associated with longer operative times (8.02 ± 2.95 vs 6.48 ± 2.81 hours, <i>P</i> < 0.001), greater mean blood loss (1,271 mL vs 600.71 mL, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and increased risks of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (aOR: 3.33, [1.59-10.17], <i>P</i> = 0.011), intraoperative transfusion (aOR: 4.43, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and incision and drainage (aOR: 7.45, [1.75-31.62], <i>P</i> < 0.01).ConclusionVenous laceration occurred in 16.61% of ALIF cases, with independent risk factors including age, CKD, L4-5 ALIF, and two-level ALIF. These injuries were associated with prolonged operative times and a markedly elevated risk of DVT. Future research should focus on developing risk reduction strategies for high-risk patients and developing evidence-based VTE prophylaxis protocols tailored to patients with venous injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251350942"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12158971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251350942","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and complications associated with intraoperative venous injury during anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).MethodsThis retrospective review included patients who underwent one- to four-level ALIF at an academic spine center. Patients <18 years old or those with surgical indications for trauma, infection, or malignancy were excluded. Patients were stratified by the presence of venous laceration requiring primary suture repair. Comparative analyses were performed using Student's t test and Pearson's Chi-squared test. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors and postoperative complications.ResultsAmong 554 patients, 92 (16.61%) sustained a venous laceration. Independent predictors included age (aOR: 1.03, P < 0.01), chronic kidney disease (aOR: 5.17, P < 0.01), ALIF at L4-5 (aOR: 3.88, P < 0.01), and two-level ALIF (aOR: 1.70, P < 0.01). ALIF at L5-S1 was protective (aOR: 0.24, P < 0.001). Venous laceration was associated with longer operative times (8.02 ± 2.95 vs 6.48 ± 2.81 hours, P < 0.001), greater mean blood loss (1,271 mL vs 600.71 mL, P < 0.001), and increased risks of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (aOR: 3.33, [1.59-10.17], P = 0.011), intraoperative transfusion (aOR: 4.43, P < 0.001), and incision and drainage (aOR: 7.45, [1.75-31.62], P < 0.01).ConclusionVenous laceration occurred in 16.61% of ALIF cases, with independent risk factors including age, CKD, L4-5 ALIF, and two-level ALIF. These injuries were associated with prolonged operative times and a markedly elevated risk of DVT. Future research should focus on developing risk reduction strategies for high-risk patients and developing evidence-based VTE prophylaxis protocols tailored to patients with venous injuries.

腰椎前路椎体间融合术中静脉损伤:发生率、危险因素和并发症。
研究设计回顾性队列研究。目的探讨腰椎前路椎体间融合术(ALIF)中静脉损伤的发生率、危险因素及并发症。方法本回顾性研究纳入了在学术脊柱中心接受一至四级ALIF治疗的患者。患者t检验和皮尔逊卡方检验。单变量和多变量logistic回归确定了独立危险因素和术后并发症。结果554例患者中,92例(16.61%)发生静脉撕裂伤。独立预测因素包括年龄(aOR: 1.03, P < 0.01)、慢性肾脏疾病(aOR: 5.17, P < 0.01)、L4-5 ALIF (aOR: 3.88, P < 0.01)、二级ALIF (aOR: 1.70, P < 0.01)。L5-S1时ALIF具有保护作用(aOR: 0.24, P < 0.001)。静脉撕裂伤与手术时间延长(8.02±2.95 vs 6.48±2.81小时,P < 0.001)、平均失血量增加(1271 mL vs 600.71 mL, P < 0.001)、深静脉血栓形成(DVT) (aOR: 3.33, [1.59-10.17], P = 0.011)、术中输血(aOR: 4.43, P < 0.001)、切开引流(aOR: 7.45, [1.75-31.62], P < 0.01)的风险增加相关。结论ALIF患者发生静脉撕裂伤的比例为16.61%,其独立危险因素包括年龄、CKD、L4-5 ALIF和二级ALIF。这些损伤与手术时间延长和DVT风险显著升高有关。未来的研究应侧重于为高风险患者制定降低风险的策略,并针对静脉损伤患者制定循证静脉血栓栓塞预防方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信