A Randomized Controlled Phase 2 Trial Comparing Salvage Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Delivered in 4 Versus 2 Weeks (SHORTER): Acute Genitourinary and Gastrointestinal Patient-reported Outcomes at a Single Institution.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Himanshu Nagar, Marshall A Diven, Brady Rippon, Christopher E Barbieri, Jim C Hu, Douglas S Scherr, Pragya Yadav, Lhaden Tshering, Sharanya Chandrasekhar, Sydney Wolfe, Ryan Pennell, Madeline Coonce, Shu Ling Chen, Silvia C Formenti, Paul Strong, Elai Davicioni, Ana M Molina, David M Nanus, Jones T Nauseef, Cora N Sternberg, Xi K Zhou, Wanna Lei, Joseph R Osborne, Ariel E Marciscano, Scott T Tagawa
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Phase 2 Trial Comparing Salvage Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Delivered in 4 Versus 2 Weeks (SHORTER): Acute Genitourinary and Gastrointestinal Patient-reported Outcomes at a Single Institution.","authors":"Himanshu Nagar, Marshall A Diven, Brady Rippon, Christopher E Barbieri, Jim C Hu, Douglas S Scherr, Pragya Yadav, Lhaden Tshering, Sharanya Chandrasekhar, Sydney Wolfe, Ryan Pennell, Madeline Coonce, Shu Ling Chen, Silvia C Formenti, Paul Strong, Elai Davicioni, Ana M Molina, David M Nanus, Jones T Nauseef, Cora N Sternberg, Xi K Zhou, Wanna Lei, Joseph R Osborne, Ariel E Marciscano, Scott T Tagawa","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.05.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Some patients undergoing prostatectomy develop biochemical recurrence or have persistently detectable prostate-specific antigen level. Salvage radiotherapy (RT), delivered over ≥4 wk, is a current standard of care. Our objective was to demonstrate that salvage RT delivered in a five-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) regimen does not significantly increase patient-reported genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms compared with a 20-fraction regimen (HYPO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized noninferiority study, 137 patients were randomized 1:1 to salvage RT with 32.5 Gy in five fractions or 55 Gy in 20 fractions. We report acute changes in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) scores and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events at 3 and 6 mo.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The difference in the changes in EPIC GU scores between SBRT and HYPO was 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], -8.53, 1.93), indicating a lack of a clinically meaningful difference. The difference in the changes in EPIC GI scores between SBRT and HYPO was 1.16 (95% CI, -5.15, 7.46), indicating a lack of a clinically meaningful difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Salvage RT delivered in five fractions was not associated with a significantly worse decline in patient-reported GU or GI toxicities at 3 or 6 mo. Further follow-up is necessary to monitor for potential differences in late toxicity and patient-reported outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.05.014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Some patients undergoing prostatectomy develop biochemical recurrence or have persistently detectable prostate-specific antigen level. Salvage radiotherapy (RT), delivered over ≥4 wk, is a current standard of care. Our objective was to demonstrate that salvage RT delivered in a five-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) regimen does not significantly increase patient-reported genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms compared with a 20-fraction regimen (HYPO).

Methods: In this randomized noninferiority study, 137 patients were randomized 1:1 to salvage RT with 32.5 Gy in five fractions or 55 Gy in 20 fractions. We report acute changes in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) scores and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events at 3 and 6 mo.

Key findings and limitations: The difference in the changes in EPIC GU scores between SBRT and HYPO was 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], -8.53, 1.93), indicating a lack of a clinically meaningful difference. The difference in the changes in EPIC GI scores between SBRT and HYPO was 1.16 (95% CI, -5.15, 7.46), indicating a lack of a clinically meaningful difference.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Salvage RT delivered in five fractions was not associated with a significantly worse decline in patient-reported GU or GI toxicities at 3 or 6 mo. Further follow-up is necessary to monitor for potential differences in late toxicity and patient-reported outcomes.

一项随机对照2期试验比较4周和2周(更短)的前列腺癌补救性放疗:单个机构急性泌尿生殖系统和胃肠道患者报告的结果。
背景与目的:一些前列腺切除术患者出现生化复发或前列腺特异性抗原水平持续可检出。补救性放疗(RT),给予≥4周,是目前的标准护理。我们的目的是证明,与20分立体定向放射治疗方案(HYPO)相比,5分立体定向放射治疗方案(SBRT)提供的补偿性放射治疗不会显著增加患者报告的泌尿生殖系统(GU)和胃肠道(GI)症状。方法:在这项随机非劣效性研究中,137例患者以1:1的比例随机分配到32.5 Gy / 5次或55 Gy / 20次的补救性放疗。我们报告了扩展前列腺癌指数综合(EPIC)评分和不良事件通用术语标准在3和6个月时的急性变化。主要发现和局限性:SBRT和HYPO之间EPIC GU评分变化的差异为3.3(95%可信区间[CI], -8.53, 1.93),表明缺乏临床意义的差异。SBRT和HYPO之间的EPIC GI评分变化差异为1.16 (95% CI, -5.15, 7.46),表明缺乏具有临床意义的差异。结论和临床意义:在3个月或6个月时,分五个部分进行的补救性放疗与患者报告的GU或GI毒性的显著恶化下降无关。需要进一步随访以监测晚期毒性和患者报告的结果的潜在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信