The impact of a preprescribing formative assessment on learning in final-year medical students using hospital inpatient electronic prescribing systems.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kellie A Charles, Lorna Pairman, Emily Moon, Daniel Wong, John Quayle, Tim J Wilkinson, Matthew Doogue, Paul Chin
{"title":"The impact of a preprescribing formative assessment on learning in final-year medical students using hospital inpatient electronic prescribing systems.","authors":"Kellie A Charles, Lorna Pairman, Emily Moon, Daniel Wong, John Quayle, Tim J Wilkinson, Matthew Doogue, Paul Chin","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Graduating medical students consistently report being unprepared for the complexity of prescribing in clinical practice. Current clinical prescribing teaching and authentic assessment are limited due to patient safety concerns. We aimed to examine the educational utility of supervised preprescribing as a learning process and potential authentic workplace-based assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Student preprescriptions and student-authorized prescriptions were extracted from electronic prescribing and administration system data. Patient clinical records were reviewed to identify outcomes of student-authorized prescriptions. All prescription data were analysed with descriptive statistics. Current students, recent graduates (post-graduate year 1 doctors) and supervisors were interviewed to explore of educational impact of supervised preprescribing by inductive reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The live electronic prescribing and administration system was used by 355/370 students over 4 academic years (23 November 2020-19 November 2024). They created 25 324 preprescriptions in 3268 patients. Supervising doctors promoted/authorized 58% (14 684/25324) to live prescriptions. Of 296 student-authorized prescriptions, 33% (97/296) were administered to patients, and only 3% (8/296) were not potentially appropriate. No adverse drug reactions to these 8 prescriptions were documented. The preprescribing model was found to benefit student learning, confidence and identity through 5 themes: Practice, practice, practice, Prescribing with support, Conquering time, Safety protected and Becoming a real medical doctor.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Supervised preprescribing within clinical settings is feasible and improves student prescribing confidence. Human and system mechanisms managed patient safety concerns and facilitated safe, authentic student preprescribing. This supports inclusion of formative assessment, in the form of supervised preprescribing as authentic workplace-based learning of prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Graduating medical students consistently report being unprepared for the complexity of prescribing in clinical practice. Current clinical prescribing teaching and authentic assessment are limited due to patient safety concerns. We aimed to examine the educational utility of supervised preprescribing as a learning process and potential authentic workplace-based assessment.

Methods: Student preprescriptions and student-authorized prescriptions were extracted from electronic prescribing and administration system data. Patient clinical records were reviewed to identify outcomes of student-authorized prescriptions. All prescription data were analysed with descriptive statistics. Current students, recent graduates (post-graduate year 1 doctors) and supervisors were interviewed to explore of educational impact of supervised preprescribing by inductive reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: The live electronic prescribing and administration system was used by 355/370 students over 4 academic years (23 November 2020-19 November 2024). They created 25 324 preprescriptions in 3268 patients. Supervising doctors promoted/authorized 58% (14 684/25324) to live prescriptions. Of 296 student-authorized prescriptions, 33% (97/296) were administered to patients, and only 3% (8/296) were not potentially appropriate. No adverse drug reactions to these 8 prescriptions were documented. The preprescribing model was found to benefit student learning, confidence and identity through 5 themes: Practice, practice, practice, Prescribing with support, Conquering time, Safety protected and Becoming a real medical doctor.

Discussion: Supervised preprescribing within clinical settings is feasible and improves student prescribing confidence. Human and system mechanisms managed patient safety concerns and facilitated safe, authentic student preprescribing. This supports inclusion of formative assessment, in the form of supervised preprescribing as authentic workplace-based learning of prescribing.

处方形成性评估对医学生使用医院住院电子处方系统学习的影响。
目的:毕业的医学生一致报告说,他们对临床实践中处方的复杂性毫无准备。目前的临床处方教学和真实评估是有限的,由于病人的安全问题。我们的目的是检验监督处方作为一种学习过程的教育效用和潜在的真实的基于工作场所的评估。方法:从电子处方管理系统数据中提取学生处方和学生授权处方。对患者临床记录进行审查,以确定学生授权处方的结果。所有处方资料用描述性统计进行分析。对在校学生、应届毕业生(研究生一年级博士)和导师进行访谈,采用归纳反思性主题分析探讨监督处方的教育影响。结果:355/370名学生在4学年(2020年11月23日- 2024年11月19日)期间使用了实时电子处方管理系统。他们为3268名患者开了25324张处方。督导医生促进/授权58%(14 684/25324)使用活处方。在296张学生授权的处方中,33%(97/296)给了患者,只有3%(8/296)可能不合适。8份处方均无不良反应记录。通过五个主题:实践、实践、实践、支持处方、征服时间、安全保护和成为一名真正的医生,发现处方模式有利于学生的学习、自信和认同。讨论:监督处方在临床设置是可行的,提高学生处方的信心。人力和系统机制管理了患者的安全问题,并促进了安全、真实的学生处方。这支持纳入形成性评估,以监督处方的形式作为真正的基于工作场所的处方学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信