Test-retest reliability of kinematic and EEG low-beta spectral features in a robot-based arm movement task.

IF 1.6 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Sebastian Rueda-Parra, Russell Hardesty, Darren E Gemoets, N Jeremy Hill, Disha Gupta
{"title":"Test-retest reliability of kinematic and EEG low-beta spectral features in a robot-based arm movement task.","authors":"Sebastian Rueda-Parra, Russell Hardesty, Darren E Gemoets, N Jeremy Hill, Disha Gupta","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/ade317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Low-beta (L<i>β</i>, 13-20 Hz) power plays a key role in upper-limb motor control and afferent processing, making it a strong candidate for a neurophysiological biomarker. We investigate the test-retest reliability of L<i>β</i>power and kinematic features from a robotic task over extended intervals between sessions to assess its potential for tracking longitudinal changes in sensorimotor function.<i>Approach.</i>We designed and optimized a testing protocol to evaluate L<i>β</i>power and kinematic features (maximal and mean speed, reaction time, and movement duration) in ten right-handed healthy individuals that performed a planar center-out task using a robotic device and EEG for data collection. The task was performed with both hands, and the experiment was repeated approximately 40 days later under similar conditions, to resemble real-life intervention periods. We first characterized the selected features within the task context for each session, then assessed intersession agreement, the test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC), and established threshold values for meaningful changes in L<i>β</i>power using Bland-Altman plots and repeatability coefficients.<i>Main Results.</i>L<i>β</i>power showed the expected contralateral reduction during movement preparation and onset. Both L<i>β</i>power and kinematic features exhibited good to excellent test-retest reliability (ICC > 0.8), displaying no significant intersession differences. Kinematic results align with prior literature, reinforcing the robustness of these measures in tracking motor performance over time. Changes in L<i>β</i>power between sessions exceeding 11.4% for right-arm and 16.5% for left-arm movements reflect meaningful intersession differences.<i>Significance.</i>This study provides evidence that L<i>β</i>power remains stable over extended intersession intervals comparable to rehabilitation timelines. The strong reliability of both L<i>β</i>power and kinematic features supports their use in monitoring upper-extremity sensorimotor function longitudinally, with L<i>β</i>power emerging as a promising biomarker for tracking therapeutic outcomes, postulating it as a reliable feature for long-term applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ade317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.Low-beta (Lβ, 13-20 Hz) power plays a key role in upper-limb motor control and afferent processing, making it a strong candidate for a neurophysiological biomarker. We investigate the test-retest reliability of Lβpower and kinematic features from a robotic task over extended intervals between sessions to assess its potential for tracking longitudinal changes in sensorimotor function.Approach.We designed and optimized a testing protocol to evaluate Lβpower and kinematic features (maximal and mean speed, reaction time, and movement duration) in ten right-handed healthy individuals that performed a planar center-out task using a robotic device and EEG for data collection. The task was performed with both hands, and the experiment was repeated approximately 40 days later under similar conditions, to resemble real-life intervention periods. We first characterized the selected features within the task context for each session, then assessed intersession agreement, the test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC), and established threshold values for meaningful changes in Lβpower using Bland-Altman plots and repeatability coefficients.Main Results.Lβpower showed the expected contralateral reduction during movement preparation and onset. Both Lβpower and kinematic features exhibited good to excellent test-retest reliability (ICC > 0.8), displaying no significant intersession differences. Kinematic results align with prior literature, reinforcing the robustness of these measures in tracking motor performance over time. Changes in Lβpower between sessions exceeding 11.4% for right-arm and 16.5% for left-arm movements reflect meaningful intersession differences.Significance.This study provides evidence that Lβpower remains stable over extended intersession intervals comparable to rehabilitation timelines. The strong reliability of both Lβpower and kinematic features supports their use in monitoring upper-extremity sensorimotor function longitudinally, with Lβpower emerging as a promising biomarker for tracking therapeutic outcomes, postulating it as a reliable feature for long-term applications.

机器人手臂运动任务中运动和脑电低β谱特征的重测信度。
目的:低β (Lβ, 13-20 Hz)功率在上肢运动控制和传入加工中起关键作用,使其成为一种强有力的神经生理生物标志物候选。我们研究了Lβ功率的测试-重测可靠性和机器人任务之间的运动特征,以评估其跟踪感觉运动功能纵向变化的潜力。方法:我们设计并优化了一种测试方案,以评估10名右撇子健康个体的Lβ功率和运动学特征(最大和平均速度、反应时间和运动持续时间),这些人使用机器人设备和EEG进行平面中心向外任务。这项任务是用双手完成的,大约40天后在类似的条件下重复实验,以模拟现实生活中的干预期。我们首先描述了每次会话的任务上下文中选择的特征,然后评估了会话间一致性,测试-重测信度(类内相关系数,ICC),并使用Bland-Altman图和可重复性系数建立了Lβ功率有意义变化的阈值。主要结果:在运动准备和开始时,Lβ功率显示预期的对侧降低。Lβ功率和运动学特征均表现出良好至优异的重测信度(ICC > 0.8),且无显著的间歇差异。运动学结果与先前的文献一致,加强了这些措施在跟踪运动性能方面的稳健性。右臂运动的Lβ能量变化超过11.4%,左臂运动的Lβ能量变化超过16.5%,反映了有意义的间歇差异。意义:本研究提供的证据表明,与康复时间相比,Lβ能量在延长的间歇时间内保持稳定。Lβ功率和运动学特征的高可靠性支持它们在纵向监测上肢感觉运动功能方面的应用,Lβ功率成为跟踪治疗结果的有前途的生物标志物,假设它是长期应用的可靠特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信