Addressing BCI inefficiency in c-VEP-based BCIs: A comprehensive study of neurophysiological predictors, binary stimulus sequences, and user comfort.

IF 1.6 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jordy Thielen
{"title":"Addressing BCI inefficiency in c-VEP-based BCIs: A comprehensive study of neurophysiological predictors, binary stimulus sequences, and user comfort.","authors":"Jordy Thielen","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/ade316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>This study investigated the presence of brain-computer interface (BCI) inefficiency in BCIs using the code-modulated visual evoked potential (c-VEP). It further explored neurophysiological predictors of performance variability and evaluated a wide range of binary stimulus sequences in terms of classification accuracy and user comfort, aiming to identify strategies to mitigate c-VEP BCI inefficiency.<i>Approach.</i>In a comprehensive empirical analysis, ten different binary stimulus sequences were offline evaluated. These sequences included five code families (m-sequence, de Bruijn sequence, Golay sequence, Gold code, and a Gold code set), each in original and modulated form. To identify predictors of performance variability, resting-state alpha activity, heart rate and heart rate variability, sustained attention, and flash-VEP characteristics were studied.<i>Main Results.</i>Results confirmed substantial inter-individual variability in c-VEP BCI efficiency. While all participants reached a near-perfect classification accuracy, their obtained speed varied substantially. Four flash-VEP features were found to significantly correlate with the observed performance varibility: the N2 latency, the P2 latency and amplitude, and the N3 amplitude. Among the tested stimulus conditions, the m-sequence emerged as the best-performing universal stimulus. However, tailoring stimulus selection to individuals led to significant improvements in performance. Cross-decoding was successful between modulated stimulus conditions, but showed challenges when generalizing across other stimulus conditions. Lastly, while overall comfort ratings were comparable across conditions, stimulus modulation was associated with a significant decrease in user comfort.<i>Significance.</i>This study challenges the assumption of universal efficiency in c-VEP BCIs. The findings highlight the importance of accounting for individual neurophysiological differences and underscore the need for personalized stimulus protocols and decoding strategies to enhance both performance and user comfort.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ade316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.This study investigated the presence of brain-computer interface (BCI) inefficiency in BCIs using the code-modulated visual evoked potential (c-VEP). It further explored neurophysiological predictors of performance variability and evaluated a wide range of binary stimulus sequences in terms of classification accuracy and user comfort, aiming to identify strategies to mitigate c-VEP BCI inefficiency.Approach.In a comprehensive empirical analysis, ten different binary stimulus sequences were offline evaluated. These sequences included five code families (m-sequence, de Bruijn sequence, Golay sequence, Gold code, and a Gold code set), each in original and modulated form. To identify predictors of performance variability, resting-state alpha activity, heart rate and heart rate variability, sustained attention, and flash-VEP characteristics were studied.Main Results.Results confirmed substantial inter-individual variability in c-VEP BCI efficiency. While all participants reached a near-perfect classification accuracy, their obtained speed varied substantially. Four flash-VEP features were found to significantly correlate with the observed performance varibility: the N2 latency, the P2 latency and amplitude, and the N3 amplitude. Among the tested stimulus conditions, the m-sequence emerged as the best-performing universal stimulus. However, tailoring stimulus selection to individuals led to significant improvements in performance. Cross-decoding was successful between modulated stimulus conditions, but showed challenges when generalizing across other stimulus conditions. Lastly, while overall comfort ratings were comparable across conditions, stimulus modulation was associated with a significant decrease in user comfort.Significance.This study challenges the assumption of universal efficiency in c-VEP BCIs. The findings highlight the importance of accounting for individual neurophysiological differences and underscore the need for personalized stimulus protocols and decoding strategies to enhance both performance and user comfort.

解决基于c- vep的脑机接口的脑机接口效率低下:一项神经生理预测指标、二值刺激序列和用户舒适度的综合研究。
目的:本研究利用编码调制视觉诱发电位(c-VEP)研究脑机接口(BCI)低效率的存在。该研究进一步探索了表现变异性的神经生理学预测因子,并从分类准确性和用户舒适度方面评估了广泛的二元刺激序列,旨在确定缓解c-VEP脑机接口效率低下的策略。 ;方法 ;在综合实证分析中,对10种不同的二值刺激序列进行离线评价。这些序列包括5个码族(m-序列、de Bruijn序列、Golay序列、Gold码和Gold码集),每个码族都有原始和调制形式。为了确定表现变异性的预测因素,研究了静息状态α活动、心率和心率变异性、持续注意力和闪速vep特征。主要结果结果证实了c-VEP BCI效率存在显著的个体间差异。虽然所有的参与者都达到了近乎完美的分类准确度,但他们获得的速度差异很大。我们发现四个flash-VEP特征与观察到的性能变异性显著相关:N2潜伏期、P2潜伏期和振幅以及N3振幅。在测试的刺激条件中,m序列是表现最好的通用刺激条件。然而,为个体量身定制刺激选择导致了表现的显著改善。交叉解码在调制刺激条件之间是成功的,但在推广到其他刺激条件时存在挑战。最后,虽然不同条件下的总体舒适度评级是相似的,但刺激调节与用户舒适度的显著下降有关。意义。本研究挑战了c-VEP脑机接口普遍效率的假设。研究结果强调了考虑个体神经生理差异的重要性,并强调了个性化刺激方案和解码策略的必要性,以提高性能和用户舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信