Assessing the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score: A National Analysis.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
American Surgeon Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-10 DOI:10.1177/00031348251350990
Henrik A Hahamyan, Allen D Archer, Matthew A Heard, Nathan A Dockery, Amy E Wahlquist, J Bracken Burns
{"title":"Assessing the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score: A National Analysis.","authors":"Henrik A Hahamyan, Allen D Archer, Matthew A Heard, Nathan A Dockery, Amy E Wahlquist, J Bracken Burns","doi":"10.1177/00031348251350990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundTo assess the strength of the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) in predicting mortality in geriatric trauma patients using a nationally representative sample.MethodsData from the National Trauma Data Bank were collected retrospectively from 2017 and 2018 for patients aged 65 and older (N = 487,317). Age, injury severity score (ISS), transfusion status, and hospital discharge status (survived vs deceased) were extracted. GTOS was then calculated for each patient. Simple logistic regression models were used to model hospital discharge status with GTOS and each component. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created using the predicted probabilities from the logistic models, and the area under the curve (AUC) for each model was calculated.ResultsPatients had a mean (SD) GTOS of 101.85 (19.53), age of 77.06 (7.20) years, and ISS of 9.75 (6.90). Very few (2%) patients had a blood transfusion within 24 hours of admission, and the overall survival rate was 96%. All models showed statistical significance in predicting discharge status (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) with AUCs of 0.5436 (age), 0.5727 (receipt of blood), 0.7979 (ISS), and 0.8145 (GTOS). When comparing models from each component to that of GTOS, GTOS remained more predictive than each individual component (<i>P</i> < 0.0001).DiscussionAfter analyzing our models based on a nationally representative trauma data bank, GTOS predicted mortality better than each of its individual components. Therefore, GTOS is an appropriate tool to predict mortality among geriatric trauma patients and should be considered for applications such as informing goals-of-care or trauma transfer decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"1238-1243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251350990","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundTo assess the strength of the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) in predicting mortality in geriatric trauma patients using a nationally representative sample.MethodsData from the National Trauma Data Bank were collected retrospectively from 2017 and 2018 for patients aged 65 and older (N = 487,317). Age, injury severity score (ISS), transfusion status, and hospital discharge status (survived vs deceased) were extracted. GTOS was then calculated for each patient. Simple logistic regression models were used to model hospital discharge status with GTOS and each component. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created using the predicted probabilities from the logistic models, and the area under the curve (AUC) for each model was calculated.ResultsPatients had a mean (SD) GTOS of 101.85 (19.53), age of 77.06 (7.20) years, and ISS of 9.75 (6.90). Very few (2%) patients had a blood transfusion within 24 hours of admission, and the overall survival rate was 96%. All models showed statistical significance in predicting discharge status (P < 0.0001) with AUCs of 0.5436 (age), 0.5727 (receipt of blood), 0.7979 (ISS), and 0.8145 (GTOS). When comparing models from each component to that of GTOS, GTOS remained more predictive than each individual component (P < 0.0001).DiscussionAfter analyzing our models based on a nationally representative trauma data bank, GTOS predicted mortality better than each of its individual components. Therefore, GTOS is an appropriate tool to predict mortality among geriatric trauma patients and should be considered for applications such as informing goals-of-care or trauma transfer decision-making.

评估老年创伤结局评分:一项国家分析。
背景:通过全国代表性样本评估老年创伤结局评分(GTOS)在预测老年创伤患者死亡率方面的优势。方法回顾性收集国家创伤数据库2017年和2018年65岁及以上患者的数据(N = 487,317)。提取年龄、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、输血状况和出院状况(存活vs死亡)。然后计算每位患者的GTOS。采用简单logistic回归模型对GTOS和各成分进行出院状态建模。根据logistic模型的预测概率,建立受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并计算每个模型的曲线下面积(AUC)。结果患者平均(SD) GTOS为101.85(19.53),年龄为77.06(7.20)岁,ISS为9.75(6.90)岁。极少(2%)患者在入院24小时内输血,总生存率为96%。各模型预测出院状态的auc分别为0.5436(年龄)、0.5727(接受血量)、0.7979 (ISS)、0.8145 (GTOS),均有统计学意义(P < 0.0001)。当将每个组件的模型与GTOS的模型进行比较时,GTOS仍然比每个单独组件更具预测性(P < 0.0001)。在分析了基于全国代表性创伤数据库的模型后,GTOS预测死亡率优于其每个单独组成部分。因此,GTOS是预测老年创伤患者死亡率的合适工具,在告知护理目标或创伤转移决策等应用中应予以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信