{"title":"Sweat testing and cystic fibrosis - Test performance before and after a quality improvement project in a South African tertiary hospital laboratory.","authors":"Asande Zama, Annalise E Zemlin, Marizna Korf","doi":"10.1177/00045632251350514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF) is challenging due to high quantity not sufficient (QNS) rates of sweat tests, leading to frequent retesting, increasing costs and adverse impacts on patient care. This study aimed to assess sweat test performance and implement a quality improvement project (QIP) to reduce QNS rates.MethodsA two-part retrospective audit was conducted. Part one spanned 2 years reviewing the two-tiered testing with sweat conductivity as a screening tool, followed by chloride testing. Part two evaluated the QNS rates over two 6-month periods, separated by a QIP, which involved technologist training, clinician education, patient preparation protocols and revised testing procedures.ResultsOver the 2-year period, 425 sweat tests were performed on 291 patients. Sweat conductivity testing demonstrated a lower QNS rate, 13% (31/238), compared to sweat chloride testing's 31% (33/105). High QNS rates were observed in younger infants and in malnourished or acutely ill patients. Post-QIP, the QNS rates for the total study population decreased by 5%, from an initial 30% to 25% in the sweat chloride cohort, while the acceptable QNS rate of 12% remained unchanged in the sweat conductivity cohort.ConclusionAchieving target QNS rates remains challenging, especially in younger infants, with improved QNS rates in older infants and children. Recommendations include limiting sweat testing to experienced technologists and ensuring patient readiness.</p>","PeriodicalId":8005,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"45632251350514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632251350514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundThe diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF) is challenging due to high quantity not sufficient (QNS) rates of sweat tests, leading to frequent retesting, increasing costs and adverse impacts on patient care. This study aimed to assess sweat test performance and implement a quality improvement project (QIP) to reduce QNS rates.MethodsA two-part retrospective audit was conducted. Part one spanned 2 years reviewing the two-tiered testing with sweat conductivity as a screening tool, followed by chloride testing. Part two evaluated the QNS rates over two 6-month periods, separated by a QIP, which involved technologist training, clinician education, patient preparation protocols and revised testing procedures.ResultsOver the 2-year period, 425 sweat tests were performed on 291 patients. Sweat conductivity testing demonstrated a lower QNS rate, 13% (31/238), compared to sweat chloride testing's 31% (33/105). High QNS rates were observed in younger infants and in malnourished or acutely ill patients. Post-QIP, the QNS rates for the total study population decreased by 5%, from an initial 30% to 25% in the sweat chloride cohort, while the acceptable QNS rate of 12% remained unchanged in the sweat conductivity cohort.ConclusionAchieving target QNS rates remains challenging, especially in younger infants, with improved QNS rates in older infants and children. Recommendations include limiting sweat testing to experienced technologists and ensuring patient readiness.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is the fully peer reviewed international journal of the Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine.
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry accepts papers that contribute to knowledge in all fields of laboratory medicine, especially those pertaining to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of human disease. It publishes papers on clinical biochemistry, clinical audit, metabolic medicine, immunology, genetics, biotechnology, haematology, microbiology, computing and management where they have both biochemical and clinical relevance. Papers describing evaluation or implementation of commercial reagent kits or the performance of new analysers require substantial original information. Unless of exceptional interest and novelty, studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not generally considered within the journal''s scope. Studies documenting the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with particular phenotypes will not normally be considered, given the greater strength of genome wide association studies (GWAS). Research undertaken in non-human animals will not be considered for publication in the Annals.
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is also the official journal of NVKC (de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie) and JSCC (Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry).