Lung cancer screening in Finland: a prospective randomized trial.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Viktor Wichmann, Sanna Iivanainen, Lauri Mattila, Veli-Pekka Kokkonen, Airi Jartti, Antti Kurtti, Riitta Kaarteenaho, Heidi Andersen, Antti Jekunen, Tuula Vasankari, Jussi Koivunen
{"title":"Lung cancer screening in Finland: a prospective randomized trial.","authors":"Viktor Wichmann, Sanna Iivanainen, Lauri Mattila, Veli-Pekka Kokkonen, Airi Jartti, Antti Kurtti, Riitta Kaarteenaho, Heidi Andersen, Antti Jekunen, Tuula Vasankari, Jussi Koivunen","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection of lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening can shift diagnoses to early-stage disease and improve survival. However, LDCT has several challenges such as high false positive rate and indefinite cost-effectiveness. We report here secondary and exploratory endpoints of the Low-dose CT screening for lung cancer combined with different smoking cessation approach in Finland (LDCT-SC-FI) study including recruitment channels, LDCT performance, and long-term smoking cessation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we randomized 200 current smokers with a significant smoking history in 1:1 fashion to receive a smartphone application or standard of care written materials, both for smoking cessation. All underwent LDCT screening at baseline and at 1-year. Participants were recruited through multiple channels, including newspapers, internet advertisements, and healthcare referrals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Newspaper advertisements were the most effective recruitment method, accounting for 74.5% of participants while minority came through referrals (2.5%). LDCT screening demonstrated uptake of 96.7% for both rounds combined. Six lung cancers were detected with a positive predictive value of 75%. Of the detected lung cancers, five were at stage I and all of these underwent curative intent treatment. Smoking cessation rates at 1-year were higher in the application (18.3%) than in the control arm (12.8%), though the difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR]: 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-3.41).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study suggests that LDCT screening for lung cancer is feasible in Finland. The screening examination uptake was high with both screening rounds, while the positive predictive value for lung cancer detection remained at good level.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"769-774"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12171981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early detection of lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening can shift diagnoses to early-stage disease and improve survival. However, LDCT has several challenges such as high false positive rate and indefinite cost-effectiveness. We report here secondary and exploratory endpoints of the Low-dose CT screening for lung cancer combined with different smoking cessation approach in Finland (LDCT-SC-FI) study including recruitment channels, LDCT performance, and long-term smoking cessation.

Methods: In this study, we randomized 200 current smokers with a significant smoking history in 1:1 fashion to receive a smartphone application or standard of care written materials, both for smoking cessation. All underwent LDCT screening at baseline and at 1-year. Participants were recruited through multiple channels, including newspapers, internet advertisements, and healthcare referrals.

Results: Newspaper advertisements were the most effective recruitment method, accounting for 74.5% of participants while minority came through referrals (2.5%). LDCT screening demonstrated uptake of 96.7% for both rounds combined. Six lung cancers were detected with a positive predictive value of 75%. Of the detected lung cancers, five were at stage I and all of these underwent curative intent treatment. Smoking cessation rates at 1-year were higher in the application (18.3%) than in the control arm (12.8%), though the difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR]: 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-3.41).

Interpretation: This study suggests that LDCT screening for lung cancer is feasible in Finland. The screening examination uptake was high with both screening rounds, while the positive predictive value for lung cancer detection remained at good level.

芬兰肺癌筛查:一项前瞻性随机试验。
背景:低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查早期发现肺癌可以将诊断转移到早期疾病,提高生存率。然而,LDCT存在假阳性率高、成本效益不确定等问题。我们在此报告芬兰低剂量CT筛查肺癌联合不同戒烟方法(LDCT- sc - fi)研究的次要终点和探索性终点,包括招募渠道、LDCT表现和长期戒烟。方法:在这项研究中,我们以1:1的方式随机选择了200名有明显吸烟史的吸烟者,让他们分别收到智能手机应用程序或戒烟标准的书面材料。所有患者均在基线和1年时进行了LDCT筛查。参与者是通过多种渠道招募的,包括报纸、互联网广告和医疗保健推荐。结果:报纸广告是最有效的招聘方式,占参与者的74.5%,少数人通过推荐(2.5%)。LDCT筛查显示两轮加起来的吸收率为96.7%。检测到6例肺癌,阳性预测值为75%。在检测到的肺癌中,有5例处于I期,所有这些都接受了治愈性治疗。治疗组1年戒烟率(18.3%)高于对照组(12.8%),但差异无统计学意义(优势比[OR]: 1.53, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.69-3.41)。结论:本研究提示LDCT筛查肺癌在芬兰是可行的。在两轮筛查中,筛查检查的吸收率都很高,而肺癌检测的阳性预测值保持在较好的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信