Process failure mode – product failure mechanism- effect analysis ((PFM)²EA): A novel risk assessment methodology for automated battery disassembly - Integrating process and product safety in repurposing

IF 12.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Stefan Grollitsch , Gernot Schlögl , Florian Feist , Franz Haas , Sinisa Jovic , Harald Sehrschön , Christian Ellersdorfer
{"title":"Process failure mode – product failure mechanism- effect analysis ((PFM)²EA): A novel risk assessment methodology for automated battery disassembly - Integrating process and product safety in repurposing","authors":"Stefan Grollitsch ,&nbsp;Gernot Schlögl ,&nbsp;Florian Feist ,&nbsp;Franz Haas ,&nbsp;Sinisa Jovic ,&nbsp;Harald Sehrschön ,&nbsp;Christian Ellersdorfer","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increasing adoption of electric vehicles has led to a surge in end-of-life traction batteries, necessitating safe and efficient repurposing strategies. This study introduces a novel risk assessment methodology, the process failure mode - product failure mechanism - effect analysis ((PFM)²EA), designed to evaluate safety risks in automated battery disassembly processes. The (PFM)²EA method combines two established risk analysis approaches: one focused on manufacturing processes (process failure mode and effects analysis - PFMEA) and another on product failure behaviors (failure modes, mechanisms, and effects analysis - FMMEA). By linking these perspectives, the method addresses the critical gap between process and product risks in separation processes for battery repurposing. Our approach employs a tripartite risk categorization framework, distinguishing between immediate safety hazards, long-term safety risks, and potential performance issues of reused components. The method introduces a fourth variable to the traditional scoring system, which considers severity, likelihood of occurrence, and detectability of a product failure, by adding a fourth factor: the likelihood of process failure. The determination of which was simplified by implementing an analytic hierarchy process. This enhancement allows for a more comprehensive assessment of potential hazards originating from product failure mechanisms triggered by process faults. To validate the (PFM)²EA method, a preemptive risk assessment of theoretical automated disassembly processes for three commercially available battery systems has been conducted. The study focused on processes aimed at extracting energy storage components for reuse and repurposing, examining how safety considerations influence process selection. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the (PFM)²EA method in identifying and prioritizing safety risks in battery disassembly processes. A Monte Carlo Simulation confirmed the robustness of the risk evaluations under input uncertainty, reinforcing the method’s reliability. This research contributes to the development of safer and more efficient battery repurposing strategies, addressing critical challenges in the circular economy of energy storage systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Systems","volume":"82 ","pages":"Pages 137-160"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manufacturing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278612525001554","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing adoption of electric vehicles has led to a surge in end-of-life traction batteries, necessitating safe and efficient repurposing strategies. This study introduces a novel risk assessment methodology, the process failure mode - product failure mechanism - effect analysis ((PFM)²EA), designed to evaluate safety risks in automated battery disassembly processes. The (PFM)²EA method combines two established risk analysis approaches: one focused on manufacturing processes (process failure mode and effects analysis - PFMEA) and another on product failure behaviors (failure modes, mechanisms, and effects analysis - FMMEA). By linking these perspectives, the method addresses the critical gap between process and product risks in separation processes for battery repurposing. Our approach employs a tripartite risk categorization framework, distinguishing between immediate safety hazards, long-term safety risks, and potential performance issues of reused components. The method introduces a fourth variable to the traditional scoring system, which considers severity, likelihood of occurrence, and detectability of a product failure, by adding a fourth factor: the likelihood of process failure. The determination of which was simplified by implementing an analytic hierarchy process. This enhancement allows for a more comprehensive assessment of potential hazards originating from product failure mechanisms triggered by process faults. To validate the (PFM)²EA method, a preemptive risk assessment of theoretical automated disassembly processes for three commercially available battery systems has been conducted. The study focused on processes aimed at extracting energy storage components for reuse and repurposing, examining how safety considerations influence process selection. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the (PFM)²EA method in identifying and prioritizing safety risks in battery disassembly processes. A Monte Carlo Simulation confirmed the robustness of the risk evaluations under input uncertainty, reinforcing the method’s reliability. This research contributes to the development of safer and more efficient battery repurposing strategies, addressing critical challenges in the circular economy of energy storage systems.
过程失效模式-产品失效机制-效应分析((PFM)²EA):一种新的自动电池拆解风险评估方法-在再利用中集成过程和产品安全
电动汽车的日益普及导致了报废牵引电池的激增,需要安全有效的重新利用策略。本文提出了一种新的风险评估方法,即过程失效模式-产品失效机制-效应分析(PFM)²EA),旨在评估电池自动拆卸过程中的安全风险。(PFM)²EA方法结合了两种已建立的风险分析方法:一种侧重于制造过程(过程失效模式和影响分析- PFMEA),另一种侧重于产品失效行为(失效模式、机制和影响分析- FMMEA)。通过将这些观点联系起来,该方法解决了电池再利用分离过程中工艺和产品风险之间的关键差距。我们的方法采用了三方风险分类框架,区分了立即的安全危害、长期的安全风险和重用组件的潜在性能问题。该方法向传统的评分系统引入了第四个变量,该系统通过添加第四个因素:过程失败的可能性,来考虑产品故障的严重性、发生的可能性和可检测性。通过实施层次分析法,简化了对其的确定。这一增强允许对由工艺错误引发的产品失效机制的潜在危害进行更全面的评估。为了验证(PFM)²EA方法,对三种商用电池系统的理论自动化拆卸过程进行了先发制人的风险评估。该研究的重点是旨在提取能量存储组件进行再利用和重新利用的过程,研究安全因素如何影响过程选择。研究结果证明了(PFM)²EA方法在识别和优先考虑电池拆卸过程中的安全风险方面的有效性。蒙特卡罗仿真验证了在输入不确定性条件下风险评估的鲁棒性,增强了方法的可靠性。这项研究有助于开发更安全、更有效的电池再利用策略,解决储能系统循环经济中的关键挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Journal of Manufacturing Systems 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
23.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
216
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manufacturing Systems is dedicated to showcasing cutting-edge fundamental and applied research in manufacturing at the systems level. Encompassing products, equipment, people, information, control, and support functions, manufacturing systems play a pivotal role in the economical and competitive development, production, delivery, and total lifecycle of products, meeting market and societal needs. With a commitment to publishing archival scholarly literature, the journal strives to advance the state of the art in manufacturing systems and foster innovation in crafting efficient, robust, and sustainable manufacturing systems. The focus extends from equipment-level considerations to the broader scope of the extended enterprise. The Journal welcomes research addressing challenges across various scales, including nano, micro, and macro-scale manufacturing, and spanning diverse sectors such as aerospace, automotive, energy, and medical device manufacturing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信