Implementing the Safe Airway Checklist (SAC) at the emergency department of a major teaching hospital in Rwanda: A pre- and post-intervention study

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Joseph Biramahire , Matthew Pereira , Appolinaire Manirafasha , Doris Lorette Uwamahoro , Jean Paul Mvukiyehe , Paulin Banguti , Eugene Tuyishime
{"title":"Implementing the Safe Airway Checklist (SAC) at the emergency department of a major teaching hospital in Rwanda: A pre- and post-intervention study","authors":"Joseph Biramahire ,&nbsp;Matthew Pereira ,&nbsp;Appolinaire Manirafasha ,&nbsp;Doris Lorette Uwamahoro ,&nbsp;Jean Paul Mvukiyehe ,&nbsp;Paulin Banguti ,&nbsp;Eugene Tuyishime","doi":"10.1016/j.afjem.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Airway management is a critical aspect of emergency care, and adherence to standardized protocols can improve patient outcomes. However, in resource-limited settings such as Rwanda, the implementation of airway management protocols in the emergency department (ED) may face challenges. This study aims to evaluate the impact of implementing the Safe Airway Checklist (SAC) on airway management practices and post-intubation complications in a major teaching hospital in Rwanda.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A pre- and post-intervention study design was used to assess the impact of the SAC on intubation practices and post-intubation checklist in the ED at the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali. The study included a baseline assessment of residents’ intubation practices, followed by implementation of the SAC, and post-implementation data collection to evaluate changes in adherence to airway management practices and post-intubation complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 77 intubation (40 pre-intervention and 37 post-intervention), the implementation of the SAC led to improvement in 4 key airway management practices (airway cart and glidescope setup, premedication use, restraining patients, and checking ABG within 10–15 min) in the ED. However, the reduction in rates of post-intubation complications was not statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The implementation of the Safe Airway Checklist in the ED of a major teaching hospital in Rwanda significantly improved several critical aspects of airway management. While no statistically significant reduction in post-intubation complications were observed, the decreasing trend of complication rates suggests promising benefits that merit further exploration. These findings highlight the value of standardized checklists in enhancing clinical practices and underscore the need for ongoing research to fully understand their impact on patient outcomes especially in low resources settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48515,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"15 3","pages":"Article 100871"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X25000114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Airway management is a critical aspect of emergency care, and adherence to standardized protocols can improve patient outcomes. However, in resource-limited settings such as Rwanda, the implementation of airway management protocols in the emergency department (ED) may face challenges. This study aims to evaluate the impact of implementing the Safe Airway Checklist (SAC) on airway management practices and post-intubation complications in a major teaching hospital in Rwanda.

Methods

A pre- and post-intervention study design was used to assess the impact of the SAC on intubation practices and post-intubation checklist in the ED at the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali. The study included a baseline assessment of residents’ intubation practices, followed by implementation of the SAC, and post-implementation data collection to evaluate changes in adherence to airway management practices and post-intubation complications.

Results

Among 77 intubation (40 pre-intervention and 37 post-intervention), the implementation of the SAC led to improvement in 4 key airway management practices (airway cart and glidescope setup, premedication use, restraining patients, and checking ABG within 10–15 min) in the ED. However, the reduction in rates of post-intubation complications was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

The implementation of the Safe Airway Checklist in the ED of a major teaching hospital in Rwanda significantly improved several critical aspects of airway management. While no statistically significant reduction in post-intubation complications were observed, the decreasing trend of complication rates suggests promising benefits that merit further exploration. These findings highlight the value of standardized checklists in enhancing clinical practices and underscore the need for ongoing research to fully understand their impact on patient outcomes especially in low resources settings.
在卢旺达一家大型教学医院急诊科实施安全气道检查表(SAC):一项干预前和干预后研究
背景:气道管理是急诊护理的一个关键方面,遵守标准化的方案可以改善患者的预后。然而,在资源有限的情况下,如卢旺达,气道管理协议的实施在急诊科(ED)可能面临挑战。本研究旨在评估卢旺达一家大型教学医院实施安全气道检查表(SAC)对气道管理实践和插管后并发症的影响。方法采用干预前和干预后的研究设计,评估SAC对基加利大学教学医院急诊科插管操作和插管后检查表的影响。该研究包括对居民插管实践的基线评估,随后是SAC的实施,以及实施后的数据收集,以评估对气道管理实践的依从性和插管后并发症的变化。结果77例插管(干预前40例,干预后37例)中,SAC的实施改善了急诊科4项关键气道管理措施(气道手推车和滑梯设置、用药前使用、约束患者、10-15分钟内检查血气测定),但插管后并发症发生率的降低无统计学意义。结论在卢旺达一家大型教学医院的急诊科实施安全气道检查表,显著改善了气道管理的几个关键方面。虽然没有观察到插管后并发症的统计学显著减少,但并发症发生率的下降趋势表明有希望的益处值得进一步探索。这些发现强调了标准化检查清单在加强临床实践中的价值,并强调了正在进行的研究的必要性,以充分了解它们对患者预后的影响,特别是在资源匮乏的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
85 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信