Daniel Joseph E. Berdida , Rizal Angelo N. Grande , Amr M. Mohamed , Modi Al-Moteri , Reem Ali Hofan Alshamrani , Naif A. Alanezi
{"title":"Nursing students' test anxiety and academic self-efficacy, dishonesty and performance: A structural equation model","authors":"Daniel Joseph E. Berdida , Rizal Angelo N. Grande , Amr M. Mohamed , Modi Al-Moteri , Reem Ali Hofan Alshamrani , Naif A. Alanezi","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To investigate the interrelationships among test anxiety, academic self-efficacy, academic dishonesty, and academic performance.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Students' test anxiety and its adverse impacts on academic performance is well-documented globally. However, this study is the first to examine the mediating role of academic self-efficacy between test anxiety and academic dishonesty.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional-correlational design.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Nursing students (n = 521) were consecutively recruited to participate from October 2024 to January 2025. Three standardized scales were used to collect data and were analyzed using covariance-based structural equation modeling.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Test anxiety was negatively correlated with academic self-efficacy (<em>β</em> = −0.38, <em>p</em> = 0.001) and academic performance (<em>β</em> = −0.24, <em>p</em> = 0.001) while positively associated with academic dishonesty (<em>β</em> = −0.51, <em>p</em> = 0.001). Academic self-efficacy was negatively correlated with academic dishonesty (<em>β</em> = −0.13, <em>p</em> = 0.012). Academic self-efficacy mediated between test anxiety and academic dishonesty (<em>β</em> = 0.05, <em>p</em> = 0.016). The estimated variance of academic self-efficacy was 14.79 %, which was explained by test anxiety, while academic dishonesty had a variance of 31.48 %, measured by both test anxiety and academic self-efficacy. Finally, academic performance had an estimated variance of 5.86 % explained by test anxiety only.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Nursing students' test anxiety depletes their academic self-efficacy and academic performance while intensifying academic dishonesty. Academic self-efficacy mitigates academic dishonesty and demonstrates a mediating role between test anxiety and academic dishonesty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 106804"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725002400","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims
To investigate the interrelationships among test anxiety, academic self-efficacy, academic dishonesty, and academic performance.
Background
Students' test anxiety and its adverse impacts on academic performance is well-documented globally. However, this study is the first to examine the mediating role of academic self-efficacy between test anxiety and academic dishonesty.
Design
Cross-sectional-correlational design.
Methods
Nursing students (n = 521) were consecutively recruited to participate from October 2024 to January 2025. Three standardized scales were used to collect data and were analyzed using covariance-based structural equation modeling.
Results
Test anxiety was negatively correlated with academic self-efficacy (β = −0.38, p = 0.001) and academic performance (β = −0.24, p = 0.001) while positively associated with academic dishonesty (β = −0.51, p = 0.001). Academic self-efficacy was negatively correlated with academic dishonesty (β = −0.13, p = 0.012). Academic self-efficacy mediated between test anxiety and academic dishonesty (β = 0.05, p = 0.016). The estimated variance of academic self-efficacy was 14.79 %, which was explained by test anxiety, while academic dishonesty had a variance of 31.48 %, measured by both test anxiety and academic self-efficacy. Finally, academic performance had an estimated variance of 5.86 % explained by test anxiety only.
Conclusion
Nursing students' test anxiety depletes their academic self-efficacy and academic performance while intensifying academic dishonesty. Academic self-efficacy mitigates academic dishonesty and demonstrates a mediating role between test anxiety and academic dishonesty.
期刊介绍:
Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education.
The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives.
Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.