Donation after circulatory death with thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion recovery has similar outcomes with donation after brain death for lung transplantation

Sarah Y. Park MD , Emily Hay-Arthur BA , Elizabeth J. Bashian MD , Han Le MS , Michal Schäfer MD, PhD , David N. Campbell MD , Nicholas R. Teman MD , Alice L. Gray MD , Jordan R.H. Hoffman MD, MPH , Michael T. Cain MD
{"title":"Donation after circulatory death with thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion recovery has similar outcomes with donation after brain death for lung transplantation","authors":"Sarah Y. Park MD ,&nbsp;Emily Hay-Arthur BA ,&nbsp;Elizabeth J. Bashian MD ,&nbsp;Han Le MS ,&nbsp;Michal Schäfer MD, PhD ,&nbsp;David N. Campbell MD ,&nbsp;Nicholas R. Teman MD ,&nbsp;Alice L. Gray MD ,&nbsp;Jordan R.H. Hoffman MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Michael T. Cain MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Donation after circulatory death (DCD) with thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) has been increasingly used to procure cardiac allografts; however, concerns persist regarding its impact on lung allografts. We present our institution’s experience with DCD TA-NRP and donation after brain death (DBD) lung transplants, comparing outcomes between the two techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All lung transplants recovered with DBD or DCD TA-NRP performed between October 2022 and December 2024 were included. DCD TA-NRP procured lungs were retrieved using a lung protective strategy including early reintubation and pulmonary venting as previously described. The primary outcome was survival, with secondary outcomes of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and pulmonary-related mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 85 DBD and 23 DCD TA-NRP lung transplants performed in the study period. Overall survival was not significantly different by Kaplan-Meier curve (<em>p</em> = 0.49), with 1-year absolute survival of 81.6% for DCD TA-NRP, with only one pulmonary-related mortality, and 89.4% for DBD, with six pulmonary-related mortalities. PGD grade 3 rates were not statistically different at postoperative day (POD) 0 (47.8% DCD TA-NRP vs 35.2% DBD, <em>p</em> = 0.27), POD 1 (21.7% vs 10.6%, <em>p</em> = 0.16), POD2 (8.7% vs 11.7%, <em>p</em> = 0.68), and POD3 (13.0% vs 11.8%, <em>p</em> = 0.87). Other intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were not significantly different.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Lung transplantation outcomes were not significantly different between lung grafts recovered by DCD TA-NRP and DBD. This early data suggests TA-NRP may not adversely impact DCD lung allografts during procurement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100741,"journal":{"name":"JHLT Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHLT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950133425000849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) with thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) has been increasingly used to procure cardiac allografts; however, concerns persist regarding its impact on lung allografts. We present our institution’s experience with DCD TA-NRP and donation after brain death (DBD) lung transplants, comparing outcomes between the two techniques.

Methods

All lung transplants recovered with DBD or DCD TA-NRP performed between October 2022 and December 2024 were included. DCD TA-NRP procured lungs were retrieved using a lung protective strategy including early reintubation and pulmonary venting as previously described. The primary outcome was survival, with secondary outcomes of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and pulmonary-related mortality.

Results

There were 85 DBD and 23 DCD TA-NRP lung transplants performed in the study period. Overall survival was not significantly different by Kaplan-Meier curve (p = 0.49), with 1-year absolute survival of 81.6% for DCD TA-NRP, with only one pulmonary-related mortality, and 89.4% for DBD, with six pulmonary-related mortalities. PGD grade 3 rates were not statistically different at postoperative day (POD) 0 (47.8% DCD TA-NRP vs 35.2% DBD, p = 0.27), POD 1 (21.7% vs 10.6%, p = 0.16), POD2 (8.7% vs 11.7%, p = 0.68), and POD3 (13.0% vs 11.8%, p = 0.87). Other intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were not significantly different.

Conclusion

Lung transplantation outcomes were not significantly different between lung grafts recovered by DCD TA-NRP and DBD. This early data suggests TA-NRP may not adversely impact DCD lung allografts during procurement.
循环死亡后捐献胸腹常温区域灌注恢复与脑死亡后捐献肺移植的结果相似
循环死亡(DCD)后胸腔腹腔恒温区域灌注(TA-NRP)捐献越来越多地用于心脏异体移植;然而,对其对同种异体肺移植的影响的担忧仍然存在。我们介绍了我院在DCD TA-NRP和脑死亡后肺移植(DBD)捐献方面的经验,并比较了两种技术的结果。方法纳入2022年10月至2024年12月间行DBD或DCD TA-NRP术后恢复的所有肺移植病例。DCD TA-NRP获得的肺采用肺保护策略,包括早期再插管和肺通气,如前所述。主要结局是生存,次要结局是原发性移植物功能障碍(PGD)和肺相关死亡率。结果研究期间共行DBD肺移植85例,TA-NRP肺移植23例。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,两组患者的总生存率无显著差异(p = 0.49), DCD TA-NRP组患者的1年绝对生存率为81.6%,仅有1例肺相关死亡率;DBD组患者的1年绝对生存率为89.4%,仅有6例肺相关死亡率。术后第0天(POD) PGD 3级率无统计学差异(DCD TA-NRP 47.8% vs DBD 35.2%, p = 0.27), POD 1 (21.7% vs 10.6%, p = 0.16), POD2 (8.7% vs 11.7%, p = 0.68), POD3 (13.0% vs 11.8%, p = 0.87)。其他术中、术后结果无显著差异。结论DCD - TA-NRP术后肺移植与DBD术后肺移植预后无显著差异。这些早期数据表明,TA-NRP在移植过程中可能不会对DCD肺同种异体移植物产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信