Antipsychotic treatment adherence and motor vehicle crash among drivers with schizophrenia: a case-crossover study.

John A Staples, Daniel Daly-Grafstein, Mayesha Khan, Lulu X Pei, Shannon Erdelyi, Stefanie N Rezansoff, Herbert Chan, William G Honer, Jeffrey R Brubacher
{"title":"Antipsychotic treatment adherence and motor vehicle crash among drivers with schizophrenia: a case-crossover study.","authors":"John A Staples, Daniel Daly-Grafstein, Mayesha Khan, Lulu X Pei, Shannon Erdelyi, Stefanie N Rezansoff, Herbert Chan, William G Honer, Jeffrey R Brubacher","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.250020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among individuals with schizophrenia, antipsychotic medications improve performance across several cognitive and functional domains. We sought to assess whether antipsychotic adherence reduces the risk of a motor vehicle crash.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a case-crossover study using population-based administrative health and driving data from British Columbia, Canada. We included individuals with schizophrenia who were involved as a driver in a police-attended motor vehicle crash during a 15-year interval (2001-2016) and who filled prescriptions for antipsychotic medication as an outpatient in the 2 years before the crash. We measured adherence to antipsychotic treatment by using prescription fill data to calculate the medication possession ratio (MPR) in the 30 days before the crash (the pre-crash interval) and in a 30-day control interval ending 1 year before the crash. We used conditional logistic regression to evaluate the association between MPR and motor vehicle crash after adjusting for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1130 eligible motor vehicle crashes involving drivers with schizophrenia, the mean antipsychotic MPR was 0.69 in the pre-crash intervals and 0.76 in the control intervals. We found that perfect adherence to antipsychotic medication was associated with half the odds of a crash relative to complete nonadherence (adjusted odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.66). The findings were consistent among subgroups defined by sex, age, and history of alcohol or drug misuse.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Better adherence to antipsychotic medications was associated with lower crash risk. Physicians and fitness-to-drive policy-makers might consider antipsychotic treatment adherence as a condition for maintaining an active driver's licence among individuals with schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":520595,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne","volume":"197 22","pages":"E612-E619"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12154407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.250020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Among individuals with schizophrenia, antipsychotic medications improve performance across several cognitive and functional domains. We sought to assess whether antipsychotic adherence reduces the risk of a motor vehicle crash.

Methods: We performed a case-crossover study using population-based administrative health and driving data from British Columbia, Canada. We included individuals with schizophrenia who were involved as a driver in a police-attended motor vehicle crash during a 15-year interval (2001-2016) and who filled prescriptions for antipsychotic medication as an outpatient in the 2 years before the crash. We measured adherence to antipsychotic treatment by using prescription fill data to calculate the medication possession ratio (MPR) in the 30 days before the crash (the pre-crash interval) and in a 30-day control interval ending 1 year before the crash. We used conditional logistic regression to evaluate the association between MPR and motor vehicle crash after adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: Among 1130 eligible motor vehicle crashes involving drivers with schizophrenia, the mean antipsychotic MPR was 0.69 in the pre-crash intervals and 0.76 in the control intervals. We found that perfect adherence to antipsychotic medication was associated with half the odds of a crash relative to complete nonadherence (adjusted odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.66). The findings were consistent among subgroups defined by sex, age, and history of alcohol or drug misuse.

Interpretation: Better adherence to antipsychotic medications was associated with lower crash risk. Physicians and fitness-to-drive policy-makers might consider antipsychotic treatment adherence as a condition for maintaining an active driver's licence among individuals with schizophrenia.

精神分裂症患者抗精神病药物治疗依从性与机动车碰撞:一项病例交叉研究。
背景:在精神分裂症患者中,抗精神病药物可以改善几个认知和功能领域的表现。我们试图评估抗精神病药物依从性是否能降低机动车碰撞的风险。方法:我们使用来自加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的基于人口的行政卫生和驾驶数据进行了一项病例交叉研究。我们纳入了精神分裂症患者,他们在15年的间隔时间(2001-2016年)内作为司机参与了一次警察参与的机动车事故,并在事故发生前2年作为门诊病人开了抗精神病药物处方。我们通过使用处方填充数据来计算在崩溃前30天(崩溃前间隔)和在崩溃前1年结束的30天对照间隔内的药物占有比(MPR)来测量抗精神病药物治疗的依从性。在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,我们使用条件逻辑回归来评估MPR与机动车碰撞之间的关系。结果:在1130起涉及精神分裂症驾驶员的机动车碰撞中,碰撞前间隔的平均抗精神病药物MPR为0.69,对照组间隔为0.76。我们发现,完全坚持抗精神病药物治疗与完全不坚持治疗相比,撞车的几率为一半(调整优势比0.50,95%可信区间0.38-0.66)。这些发现在按性别、年龄、酒精或药物滥用史定义的亚组中是一致的。结论:较好的抗精神病药物依从性与较低的撞车风险相关。医生和健康驾驶政策制定者可能会考虑精神分裂症患者坚持抗精神病药物治疗作为维持有效驾驶执照的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信