Performance of a smartphone-based malaria screener in detecting malaria in people living with Sickle cell disease.

IF 7.7
PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-06-09 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000884
Deborah Nimako Sarpong Obeng, Samuel Osei, Nii Kpakpo Brown, David Nana Adjei, Linda Eva Amoah, Ewurama Dedea Ampadu Owusu
{"title":"Performance of a smartphone-based malaria screener in detecting malaria in people living with Sickle cell disease.","authors":"Deborah Nimako Sarpong Obeng, Samuel Osei, Nii Kpakpo Brown, David Nana Adjei, Linda Eva Amoah, Ewurama Dedea Ampadu Owusu","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Novel automated digital malaria diagnostic tests are being developed with the advancement of diagnostic tools. Whilst these tools are being evaluated and implemented in the general population, there is the need to focus on special populations such as individuals with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) who have altered red blood cell morphology and atypical immune responses, which can obscure parasite detection. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of one of such tools, the National Library of Medicine (NLM) malaria screener app in people living with sickle cell disease in a malaria-endemic country, Ghana. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among SCD patients attending the Sickle Cell Clinic at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra, Ghana. Following informed consent, whole blood samples were collected and analyzed using the NLM malaria screener app, conventional microscopy, RDT, and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), with PCR as the reference standard. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each diagnostic method were compared against PCR results. The NLM app identified the highest number of positive malaria cases, with 110 positive cases (36.2%), while both RDT and microscopy reported the highest number of negatives, with 287 negative cases (94.4%). Compared to PCR, the NLM app demonstrated a sensitivity of 89.5% and a specificity of 67.4%. RDT and microscopy displayed the same sensitivity as the NLM app, each achieving 89.5%. However, while RDT and microscopy had a specificity of 100%, the NLM app had a considerably lower specificity of 67.4%.The NLM malaria screener app shows promise as a preliminary screening tool for malaria in individuals with SCD. However, its lower specificity indicates a need for confirmatory testing to avoid potential overdiagnosis and mismanagement. Enhancements in the app's specificity could further support its utility in rapid and accessible malaria diagnosis for people with SCD, aiding in timely management and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 6","pages":"e0000884"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Novel automated digital malaria diagnostic tests are being developed with the advancement of diagnostic tools. Whilst these tools are being evaluated and implemented in the general population, there is the need to focus on special populations such as individuals with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) who have altered red blood cell morphology and atypical immune responses, which can obscure parasite detection. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of one of such tools, the National Library of Medicine (NLM) malaria screener app in people living with sickle cell disease in a malaria-endemic country, Ghana. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among SCD patients attending the Sickle Cell Clinic at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra, Ghana. Following informed consent, whole blood samples were collected and analyzed using the NLM malaria screener app, conventional microscopy, RDT, and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), with PCR as the reference standard. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each diagnostic method were compared against PCR results. The NLM app identified the highest number of positive malaria cases, with 110 positive cases (36.2%), while both RDT and microscopy reported the highest number of negatives, with 287 negative cases (94.4%). Compared to PCR, the NLM app demonstrated a sensitivity of 89.5% and a specificity of 67.4%. RDT and microscopy displayed the same sensitivity as the NLM app, each achieving 89.5%. However, while RDT and microscopy had a specificity of 100%, the NLM app had a considerably lower specificity of 67.4%.The NLM malaria screener app shows promise as a preliminary screening tool for malaria in individuals with SCD. However, its lower specificity indicates a need for confirmatory testing to avoid potential overdiagnosis and mismanagement. Enhancements in the app's specificity could further support its utility in rapid and accessible malaria diagnosis for people with SCD, aiding in timely management and treatment.

基于智能手机的疟疾筛查器在镰状细胞病患者中检测疟疾的性能
随着诊断工具的进步,正在开发新的自动化数字疟疾诊断测试。虽然这些工具正在普通人群中进行评估和实施,但需要重点关注特殊人群,如镰状细胞病(SCD)患者,他们的红细胞形态发生了改变,免疫反应不典型,这可能使寄生虫检测变得模糊。本研究旨在评估其中一种工具——国家医学图书馆(NLM)疟疾筛查应用程序在疟疾流行国家加纳镰状细胞病患者中的诊断性能。在加纳阿克拉Korle Bu教学医院镰状细胞门诊的SCD患者中进行了一项描述性横断面研究。在知情同意后,采集全血样本,并使用NLM疟疾筛查应用程序、常规显微镜、RDT和聚合酶链反应(PCR)进行分析,以PCR为参比标准。将各诊断方法的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)与PCR结果进行比较。NLM应用程序确定的阳性疟疾病例最多,有110例阳性病例(36.2%),而RDT和显微镜检查报告的阴性病例最多,有287例阴性病例(94.4%)。与PCR相比,NLM应用程序的敏感性为89.5%,特异性为67.4%。RDT和显微镜显示与NLM应用程序相同的灵敏度,均达到89.5%。然而,虽然RDT和显微镜的特异性为100%,但NLM应用程序的特异性要低得多,为67.4%。NLM疟疾筛查应用程序有望成为SCD患者疟疾的初步筛查工具。然而,其较低的特异性表明需要进行确证性检测,以避免潜在的过度诊断和管理不善。增强应用程序的特异性可以进一步支持其在SCD患者的快速和可获得的疟疾诊断中的效用,帮助及时管理和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信