Comparison of whole blood on filter strips with serum for avian influenza virus antibody detection in wild birds.

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Conservation Physiology Pub Date : 2025-06-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/conphys/coaf033
Jolene A Giacinti, Ishraq Rahman, Jordan Wight, Hannah Lewis, Liam U Taylor, Jennifer F Provencher, Robert Ronconi, Yohannes Berhane, Wanhong Xu, Dmytro Zhmendak, Sailendra N Sarma, Christopher M Sharp, Joshua T Cunningham, April Hedd, Johanna-Lisa Bosch, Gregory J Robertson, Kathryn E Hargan, Andrew S Lang
{"title":"Comparison of whole blood on filter strips with serum for avian influenza virus antibody detection in wild birds.","authors":"Jolene A Giacinti, Ishraq Rahman, Jordan Wight, Hannah Lewis, Liam U Taylor, Jennifer F Provencher, Robert Ronconi, Yohannes Berhane, Wanhong Xu, Dmytro Zhmendak, Sailendra N Sarma, Christopher M Sharp, Joshua T Cunningham, April Hedd, Johanna-Lisa Bosch, Gregory J Robertson, Kathryn E Hargan, Andrew S Lang","doi":"10.1093/conphys/coaf033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Serological surveillance enhances our understanding of influenza A virus (IAV) exposure and dynamics in wild bird populations. Traditional serum-based testing, while effective, poses logistical challenges for large-scale surveillance, particularly in remote regions, for small-bodied species or in scenarios such as hunter-harvested samples where serum collection can be impractical. This study evaluates the use of whole blood collected on high-quality cellulose filter strips as an alternative to serum for detecting antibodies against IAV nucleoprotein (NP) and hemagglutinin (HA) H5 and H7 targets. We tested paired serum and whole blood on filter strips collected from wild birds using the commercially available IDEXX AI MultiS Screen Ab test and in-house competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) developed at the National Centre for Foreign Animal Disease (NCFAD) of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Strong correlations (<i>ρ</i> = 0.77) were observed between serum and whole blood on filter strips for NP detection with the IDEXX ELISA, while moderate correlations were noted for NCFAD's NP (<i>ρ</i> = 0.58) and H5 (<i>ρ</i> = 0.65) assays. Correlation between serum and whole blood on filter strips for NCFAD's H7 assay was poor, although interpretation is limited due to the small sample size of H7 positives. Threshold optimization using the Youden index improved diagnostic performance, with optimized cutoffs identified for NP (sample-to-negative < 0.7708 for IDEXX and percentage inhibition [PI] > 39.56 for NCFAD) and H5 (PI > 20.37). Storage conditions impacted performance, with frozen whole blood on filter strips achieving higher sensitivity compared to those stored at room temperature. These findings support the use of filter strips to collect whole blood as an informative alternative for IAV serological surveillance in wild birds when serum is unavailable, provided optimal storage conditions and threshold adjustments are implemented, although serum remains the superior sample type.</p>","PeriodicalId":54331,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Physiology","volume":"13 1","pages":"coaf033"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coaf033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Serological surveillance enhances our understanding of influenza A virus (IAV) exposure and dynamics in wild bird populations. Traditional serum-based testing, while effective, poses logistical challenges for large-scale surveillance, particularly in remote regions, for small-bodied species or in scenarios such as hunter-harvested samples where serum collection can be impractical. This study evaluates the use of whole blood collected on high-quality cellulose filter strips as an alternative to serum for detecting antibodies against IAV nucleoprotein (NP) and hemagglutinin (HA) H5 and H7 targets. We tested paired serum and whole blood on filter strips collected from wild birds using the commercially available IDEXX AI MultiS Screen Ab test and in-house competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) developed at the National Centre for Foreign Animal Disease (NCFAD) of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Strong correlations (ρ = 0.77) were observed between serum and whole blood on filter strips for NP detection with the IDEXX ELISA, while moderate correlations were noted for NCFAD's NP (ρ = 0.58) and H5 (ρ = 0.65) assays. Correlation between serum and whole blood on filter strips for NCFAD's H7 assay was poor, although interpretation is limited due to the small sample size of H7 positives. Threshold optimization using the Youden index improved diagnostic performance, with optimized cutoffs identified for NP (sample-to-negative < 0.7708 for IDEXX and percentage inhibition [PI] > 39.56 for NCFAD) and H5 (PI > 20.37). Storage conditions impacted performance, with frozen whole blood on filter strips achieving higher sensitivity compared to those stored at room temperature. These findings support the use of filter strips to collect whole blood as an informative alternative for IAV serological surveillance in wild birds when serum is unavailable, provided optimal storage conditions and threshold adjustments are implemented, although serum remains the superior sample type.

野生鸟类过滤条全血与血清禽流感病毒抗体检测的比较。
血清学监测增强了我们对野鸟种群中甲型流感病毒(IAV)暴露和动态的了解。传统的基于血清的检测虽然有效,但对大规模监测构成后勤挑战,特别是在偏远地区,对小型物种或在诸如猎人采集的样本等情况下,血清收集可能不切实际。本研究评估了用高质量纤维素过滤条收集的全血作为血清的替代品,用于检测针对IAV核蛋白(NP)和血凝素(HA) H5和H7靶点的抗体。我们使用市售的IDEXX AI MultiS筛选Ab测试和加拿大食品检验局国家外来动物疾病中心(NCFAD)开发的内部竞争性酶联免疫吸附测定法(elisa),对从野生鸟类采集的过滤条进行配对血清和全血检测。IDEXX ELISA检测NP时,血清和全血滤条呈强相关性(ρ = 0.77),而ncad的NP (ρ = 0.58)和H5检测呈中等相关性(ρ = 0.65)。NCFAD的H7检测滤条上的血清和全血之间的相关性很差,尽管由于H7阳性样本量小,解释有限。使用约登指数的阈值优化提高了诊断性能,确定了NP (NCFAD样本至阴性39.56)和H5 (PI bb0 20.37)的优化截止值。储存条件影响了性能,与室温下储存的全血相比,在过滤条上冷冻的全血具有更高的灵敏度。这些发现支持在没有血清的情况下,使用滤血条收集全血作为一种信息丰富的替代方法,用于野生鸟类的IAV血清学监测,提供最佳的储存条件和阈值调整,尽管血清仍然是更好的样本类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Physiology
Conservation Physiology Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Conservation Physiology is an online only, fully open access journal published on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. Biodiversity across the globe faces a growing number of threats associated with human activities. Conservation Physiology will publish research on all taxa (microbes, plants and animals) focused on understanding and predicting how organisms, populations, ecosystems and natural resources respond to environmental change and stressors. Physiology is considered in the broadest possible terms to include functional and mechanistic responses at all scales. We also welcome research towards developing and refining strategies to rebuild populations, restore ecosystems, inform conservation policy, and manage living resources. We define conservation physiology broadly and encourage potential authors to contact the editorial team if they have any questions regarding the remit of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信