Voluntary contractions underestimate peak muscle activity in drop jumps.

Q2 Medicine
International Biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-09 DOI:10.1080/23335432.2025.2518343
David Alan Phillips, Skylar Paletta, Michael Perlet
{"title":"Voluntary contractions underestimate peak muscle activity in drop jumps.","authors":"David Alan Phillips, Skylar Paletta, Michael Perlet","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2025.2518343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) are a common method to normalize electromyographic amplitude into standardized units of %MVIC. However, in 60% of drop jump research using an MVIC in 2018-2023, supramaximal activation or activation greater than 100% MVIC occurred. Therefore, MVICs may not be representative of peak muscle activation, leading to erroneous interpretation of muscle activation. The purpose of this study is to quantify EMG normalization difference in drop jump landings. Sixteen (10 M, 6F) participants were recruited for the study. MVICs were recorded from nine lower extremity muscles and this activation compared to the maximal activation recorded from 10 drop jump trials. The MVIC significantly underestimated maximum activation by 71%-140% in one-sample <i>t</i>-tests, for the rectus femoris (<i>p</i> = 0.002), vastus medialis (<i>p</i> < 0.001), medial gastrocnemius (<i>p</i> = 0.002), lateral gastrocnemius (<i>p</i> = 0.002), tibialis anterior (<i>p</i> = 0.02), and gluteus maximus (<i>p</i> = 0.03). The one-sample t-tests were not statistically significant for the remaining muscles with the data containing significant variability. Our data quantifies EMG normalization underestimate and supports the status in the literature where normalization with MVICs will underestimate maximal muscle activation in drop jump movements.</p>","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2025.2518343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) are a common method to normalize electromyographic amplitude into standardized units of %MVIC. However, in 60% of drop jump research using an MVIC in 2018-2023, supramaximal activation or activation greater than 100% MVIC occurred. Therefore, MVICs may not be representative of peak muscle activation, leading to erroneous interpretation of muscle activation. The purpose of this study is to quantify EMG normalization difference in drop jump landings. Sixteen (10 M, 6F) participants were recruited for the study. MVICs were recorded from nine lower extremity muscles and this activation compared to the maximal activation recorded from 10 drop jump trials. The MVIC significantly underestimated maximum activation by 71%-140% in one-sample t-tests, for the rectus femoris (p = 0.002), vastus medialis (p < 0.001), medial gastrocnemius (p = 0.002), lateral gastrocnemius (p = 0.002), tibialis anterior (p = 0.02), and gluteus maximus (p = 0.03). The one-sample t-tests were not statistically significant for the remaining muscles with the data containing significant variability. Our data quantifies EMG normalization underestimate and supports the status in the literature where normalization with MVICs will underestimate maximal muscle activation in drop jump movements.

自发性收缩低估了跳高时肌肉活动的峰值。
最大自主等距收缩(MVIC)是将肌电振幅归一化为MVIC %标准单位的常用方法。然而,在2018-2023年使用MVIC进行的60%的落差跳跃研究中,发生了超最大激活或超过100% MVIC的激活。因此,mvic可能不能代表肌肉激活峰值,从而导致对肌肉激活的错误解释。本研究的目的是量化跳降着陆的肌电归一化差异。16名(10名,6名)参与者被招募参加这项研究。从9个下肢肌肉中记录了mvic,并将其激活与10个弹跳试验中记录的最大激活进行了比较。在单样本t检验中,MVIC显著低估了股直肌(p = 0.002)、股内侧肌(p = 0.002)、腓肠肌外侧肌(p = 0.002)、胫前肌(p = 0.02)和臀大肌(p = 0.03)的最大激活量71%-140%。对于剩余肌肉,单样本t检验没有统计学意义,数据包含显著的变异性。我们的数据量化了肌电归一化低估,并支持了文献中mvic归一化低估落体跳跃运动中最大肌肉激活的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Biomechanics
International Biomechanics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: International Biomechanics is a fully Open Access biomechanics journal that aims to foster innovation, debate and collaboration across the full spectrum of biomechanics. We publish original articles, reviews, and short communications in all areas of biomechanics and welcome papers that explore: Bio-fluid mechanics, Continuum Biomechanics, Biotribology, Cellular Biomechanics, Mechanobiology, Mechano-transduction, Tissue Mechanics, Comparative Biomechanics and Functional Anatomy, Allometry, Animal locomotion in biomechanics, Gait analysis in biomechanics, Musculoskeletal and Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Cardiovascular Biomechanics, Plant Biomechanics, Injury Biomechanics, Impact Biomechanics, Sport and Exercise Biomechanics, Kinesiology, Rehabilitation in biomechanics, Quantitative Ergonomics, Human Factors engineering, Occupational Biomechanics, Developmental Biomechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信