Examining Sexual Exploitation in a National US Sample of LGBTQ+ Individuals Using the Revised Sexual Experiences Survey-Victimization.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Taren L McGray, Brian Dodge, Zoë D Peterson, Edward J Bedrick, Mary P Koss
{"title":"Examining Sexual Exploitation in a National US Sample of LGBTQ+ Individuals Using the Revised Sexual Experiences Survey-Victimization.","authors":"Taren L McGray, Brian Dodge, Zoë D Peterson, Edward J Bedrick, Mary P Koss","doi":"10.1080/00224499.2025.2507881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual exploitation (SE) refers to sex acts imposed without freely given permission. Despite the elevated risks of SE experienced by LGBTQ+ individuals, limitations in many existing datasets and research reports preclude a comprehensive understanding by incorporating few LGBTQ+ individuals, not disaggregating by sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI), and using non-inclusive measures of SE items. This paper presents the first use of the 2024 revised Sexual Experiences Survey-Victimization to quantify SE in a national adult LGBTQ+ sample (<i>N</i> = 474) using measurement beyond prototypical cisgender heterosexual scenarios. Prevalences of noncontact, technology-facilitated, illegal acts, and verbal pressure SE were stratified by SOGI. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between SOGI and SE. Findings suggest alarmingly high sample-wide prevalence, with 95.23% of participants reporting any experience of SE. Asexual and lesbian cisgender women had significantly lower odds of experiencing verbal pressure and illegal acts than bisexual cisgender women. High prevalence provides evidence for the urgent need to continue investigating LGBTQ+ SE, particularly illegal acts and technology-facilitated SE. Future research should oversample underrepresented SOGI subgroups to bolster cell sizes and increase reliability. Understanding LGBTQ+ SE is essential for informing targeted prevention and intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":51361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2025.2507881","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexual exploitation (SE) refers to sex acts imposed without freely given permission. Despite the elevated risks of SE experienced by LGBTQ+ individuals, limitations in many existing datasets and research reports preclude a comprehensive understanding by incorporating few LGBTQ+ individuals, not disaggregating by sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI), and using non-inclusive measures of SE items. This paper presents the first use of the 2024 revised Sexual Experiences Survey-Victimization to quantify SE in a national adult LGBTQ+ sample (N = 474) using measurement beyond prototypical cisgender heterosexual scenarios. Prevalences of noncontact, technology-facilitated, illegal acts, and verbal pressure SE were stratified by SOGI. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between SOGI and SE. Findings suggest alarmingly high sample-wide prevalence, with 95.23% of participants reporting any experience of SE. Asexual and lesbian cisgender women had significantly lower odds of experiencing verbal pressure and illegal acts than bisexual cisgender women. High prevalence provides evidence for the urgent need to continue investigating LGBTQ+ SE, particularly illegal acts and technology-facilitated SE. Future research should oversample underrepresented SOGI subgroups to bolster cell sizes and increase reliability. Understanding LGBTQ+ SE is essential for informing targeted prevention and intervention.

使用修订后的性经验调查-受害调查在美国LGBTQ+个体样本中检验性剥削。
性剥削(SE)是指在未经允许的情况下强行实施的性行为。尽管LGBTQ+个体经历SE的风险较高,但由于许多现有数据集和研究报告的局限性,由于纳入了少数LGBTQ+个体,没有按性取向和性别认同(SOGI)分类,并且使用了非包容性的SE项目测量方法,因此无法全面了解SE。本文首次使用2024年修订的性经验调查-受害来量化全国成年LGBTQ+样本(N = 474)的SE,使用的测量方法超出了典型的顺性异性恋场景。用SOGI对非接触性、技术促进性、非法行为和言语压力性SE的患病率进行分层。采用Logistic回归评估SOGI与SE之间的相关性。研究结果表明,样本范围内的患病率高得惊人,95.23%的参与者报告有SE的经历。与双性恋女性相比,无性恋女性和女同性恋女性经历语言压力和非法行为的几率明显更低。高患病率表明,迫切需要继续调查LGBTQ+ SE,特别是非法行为和技术促进的SE。未来的研究应该对代表性不足的SOGI亚群进行抽样,以支持细胞大小并提高可靠性。了解LGBTQ+ SE对于有针对性的预防和干预至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex Research (JSR) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of articles relevant to the variety of disciplines involved in the scientific study of sexuality. JSR is designed to stimulate research and promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary sexual science. JSR publishes empirical reports, theoretical essays, literature reviews, methodological articles, historical articles, teaching papers, book reviews, and letters to the editor. JSR actively seeks submissions from researchers outside of North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信