Perceptions and Use of Medical Cannabis in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Jennifer S Chiang, Jennifer Hall, Sara Richter, Scott Jackson, Vera Qu, Erqi Pollom, Beth M Beadle
{"title":"Perceptions and Use of Medical Cannabis in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.","authors":"Jennifer S Chiang, Jennifer Hall, Sara Richter, Scott Jackson, Vera Qu, Erqi Pollom, Beth M Beadle","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A survey was conducted to evaluate perceptions, use, and information sources of medical cannabis (MC) among patients with head and neck cancer and identify opportunities for providers to clarify its use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred eighty-nine consecutive patients with head and neck cancer seen in the radiation oncology department at a single institution in CA (October 2022 to June 2023; November 2023 to January 2024) were screened for eligibility and invited to participate. Surveys were emailed. Demographic/clinical data were collected and recorded from the electronic health record and surveys, including age, gender, race, ethnicity, metastatic status, COVID-19 vaccination status, substance use history, relationship and employment status, and education level. Associations between clinical/socioeconomic factors and perception/use of MC were analyzed using χ2 tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 258 eligible patients, 122 completed the survey. Most reported reliance on the internet for MC information (70%); only 20% reported consulting with their cancer treatment team. Most (75%) agreed MC can help reduce cancer-related symptoms. Some agreed or were neutral regarding the potential of MC to cure cancer (37%) or prolong life (61%). Overall, 61% of patients reported having used MC, primarily for recreation (72%) or symptom relief (37%). MC use was more common among white (P=0.001), unmarried (P=0.001), and tobacco-using individuals (P=0.045). COVID-vaccinated individuals more often believed MC reduces symptoms (P=0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many patients rely on unregulated sources regarding MC. This highlights the potential for improved provider-patient discussions to support informed decision-making regarding risks, benefits, and questions of MC in cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001218","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: A survey was conducted to evaluate perceptions, use, and information sources of medical cannabis (MC) among patients with head and neck cancer and identify opportunities for providers to clarify its use.

Methods: Two hundred eighty-nine consecutive patients with head and neck cancer seen in the radiation oncology department at a single institution in CA (October 2022 to June 2023; November 2023 to January 2024) were screened for eligibility and invited to participate. Surveys were emailed. Demographic/clinical data were collected and recorded from the electronic health record and surveys, including age, gender, race, ethnicity, metastatic status, COVID-19 vaccination status, substance use history, relationship and employment status, and education level. Associations between clinical/socioeconomic factors and perception/use of MC were analyzed using χ2 tests.

Results: Of 258 eligible patients, 122 completed the survey. Most reported reliance on the internet for MC information (70%); only 20% reported consulting with their cancer treatment team. Most (75%) agreed MC can help reduce cancer-related symptoms. Some agreed or were neutral regarding the potential of MC to cure cancer (37%) or prolong life (61%). Overall, 61% of patients reported having used MC, primarily for recreation (72%) or symptom relief (37%). MC use was more common among white (P=0.001), unmarried (P=0.001), and tobacco-using individuals (P=0.045). COVID-vaccinated individuals more often believed MC reduces symptoms (P=0.015).

Conclusion: Many patients rely on unregulated sources regarding MC. This highlights the potential for improved provider-patient discussions to support informed decision-making regarding risks, benefits, and questions of MC in cancer care.

头颈癌患者对医用大麻的认知和使用
目的:进行了一项调查,以评估头颈癌患者对医用大麻(MC)的看法、使用和信息来源,并确定供应商澄清其使用的机会。方法:从2022年10月至2023年6月,在加州单一机构的放射肿瘤科连续就诊的289例头颈癌患者;2023年11月至2024年1月)被筛选资格并被邀请参加。调查通过电子邮件发送。从电子健康记录和调查中收集和记录人口统计/临床数据,包括年龄、性别、种族、民族、转移状态、COVID-19疫苗接种状况、药物使用史、关系和就业状况以及教育水平。采用χ2检验分析临床/社会经济因素与MC认知/使用之间的关系。结果:258例符合条件的患者中,有122例完成了调查。据报告,大多数人依赖互联网获取MC信息(70%);只有20%的人咨询过他们的癌症治疗团队。大多数人(75%)同意MC可以帮助减少癌症相关症状。一些人同意或对MC治疗癌症(37%)或延长寿命(61%)的潜力持中立态度。总体而言,61%的患者报告使用过MC,主要用于娱乐(72%)或缓解症状(37%)。mcc的使用在白人(P=0.001)、未婚(P=0.001)和吸烟人群(P=0.045)中更为常见。接种过covid - 19疫苗的人更倾向于认为MC可以减轻症状(P=0.015)。结论:许多患者依赖于不受监管的MC来源。这突出了改善医患讨论的潜力,以支持关于MC在癌症治疗中的风险、收益和问题的知情决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信