Kirsty Laurie, Louise Gustafsson, Michele M Foster, David N Borg
{"title":"Service access networks at 3- and 6-months after discharge from brain injury rehabilitation: an ego-network analysis.","authors":"Kirsty Laurie, Louise Gustafsson, Michele M Foster, David N Borg","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2513047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To map the 3- and 6-month post-acute rehabilitation and healthcare networks from the perspective of people with Acquired Brain Injury and examine how these relate to funding provision and participation in a specialist transitional rehabilitation service.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifteen adults with an Acquired Brain Injury (mean age 43; range 20-63) participated in semi-structured telephone interviews at 3- and 6-month post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitation with a total of 29 interviews conducted. The interview guide was based on a social network framework and data were obtained regarding the composition, size, density, and stability of networks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated that participants' networks ranged from 3-10 health professionals. Five typologies were apparent including cohesive, cluster, core, star, and kite network. Participants' networks generally decreased in size and density at 6-month post-discharge. The networks of participants were varied, and differences in network measures were observed when comparing those who were funded by National Injury Insurance Scheme-Queensland and National Disability Insurance Scheme and those that did or did not attend Transitional Rehabilitation Service.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlighted the diversity of individuals' personal networks when assessing their composition and structural characteristics. Through the study, a deeper understanding of the networks and individuals' experiences of service provision under the existing funding and program frameworks was developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2513047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To map the 3- and 6-month post-acute rehabilitation and healthcare networks from the perspective of people with Acquired Brain Injury and examine how these relate to funding provision and participation in a specialist transitional rehabilitation service.
Materials and methods: Fifteen adults with an Acquired Brain Injury (mean age 43; range 20-63) participated in semi-structured telephone interviews at 3- and 6-month post-discharge from inpatient rehabilitation with a total of 29 interviews conducted. The interview guide was based on a social network framework and data were obtained regarding the composition, size, density, and stability of networks.
Results: Results indicated that participants' networks ranged from 3-10 health professionals. Five typologies were apparent including cohesive, cluster, core, star, and kite network. Participants' networks generally decreased in size and density at 6-month post-discharge. The networks of participants were varied, and differences in network measures were observed when comparing those who were funded by National Injury Insurance Scheme-Queensland and National Disability Insurance Scheme and those that did or did not attend Transitional Rehabilitation Service.
Conclusions: The study highlighted the diversity of individuals' personal networks when assessing their composition and structural characteristics. Through the study, a deeper understanding of the networks and individuals' experiences of service provision under the existing funding and program frameworks was developed.
期刊介绍:
Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.