Utility of Revised Risk Analysis Index as a Predictor of Mortality and Morbidity in Orthopaedic Trauma.

IF 2.1 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Chirag Soni, Victor Koltenyuk, Nithin Gupta, Haad A Arif, Aruni Areti, Taylor Manes, Luke A Lopas, Jan P Szatkowski, Christian A Bowers, Benjamin C Taylor, Jack W Weick
{"title":"Utility of Revised Risk Analysis Index as a Predictor of Mortality and Morbidity in Orthopaedic Trauma.","authors":"Chirag Soni, Victor Koltenyuk, Nithin Gupta, Haad A Arif, Aruni Areti, Taylor Manes, Luke A Lopas, Jan P Szatkowski, Christian A Bowers, Benjamin C Taylor, Jack W Weick","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the applicability of the Revised Risk Analysis Index (RAI-Rev) in orthopaedic trauma and compare the predictive discrimination for the RAI-Rev and the 5-Item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) for 30-day postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database was used.</p><p><strong>Patient selection: </strong>All patients aged 18 or older who underwent surgical treatment for forearm, humerus, pelvis, acetabulum, femur, tibia, and hindfoot fractures from 2015 to 2020 were included.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>30-day postoperative mortality, major complications, and wound complications consisting of surgical site infection, and wound dehiscence were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 206,352 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 69 years, with 64.2% (n = 132,514) being female. Multivariate regression analysis showed that increasing frailty tiers in both RAI-Rev and mFI-5 were independent predictors of mortality, major complications, readmission, and wound complications. The cohort with the highest degree of frailty in both RAI-Rev and mFI-5 had the greatest risk of poor outcomes. RAI-Rev had significantly superior predictive discriminatory thresholds compared with mFI-5 for predicting 30-day mortality (C-statistic: RAI-Rev [0.84] and mFI-5 [0.67], P < 0.001), major complications (C-statistic: RAI-Rev [0.73] and mFI-5 [0.65], P < 0.001), and readmission (C-statistic: RAI-Rev [0.68] and mFI-5 [0.63], P < 0.001). However, mFI-5 outperformed RAI-Rev when predicting wound complications (C-statistic: RAI-Rev [0.52] and mFI-5 [0.55], P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RAI-Rev tool demonstrated superior predictability of postoperative morbidity, mortality, and readmission rates compared with mFI-5 but was less effective in predicting surgical site complications. These findings demonstrate the utility of RAI-Rev in anticipating postoperative complications in the setting of orthopaedic trauma, where optimizing surgical candidate selection is not always possible. Assessing the predicted morbidity and mortality through RAI-Rev enables surgeons to accurately identify patients at high risk of complications, which can further research investigation to mitigate this risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"9 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142732/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the applicability of the Revised Risk Analysis Index (RAI-Rev) in orthopaedic trauma and compare the predictive discrimination for the RAI-Rev and the 5-Item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) for 30-day postoperative outcomes.

Methods:

Design: This is a retrospective cohort study.

Setting: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database was used.

Patient selection: All patients aged 18 or older who underwent surgical treatment for forearm, humerus, pelvis, acetabulum, femur, tibia, and hindfoot fractures from 2015 to 2020 were included.

Outcome: 30-day postoperative mortality, major complications, and wound complications consisting of surgical site infection, and wound dehiscence were measured.

Results: A total of 206,352 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 69 years, with 64.2% (n = 132,514) being female. Multivariate regression analysis showed that increasing frailty tiers in both RAI-Rev and mFI-5 were independent predictors of mortality, major complications, readmission, and wound complications. The cohort with the highest degree of frailty in both RAI-Rev and mFI-5 had the greatest risk of poor outcomes. RAI-Rev had significantly superior predictive discriminatory thresholds compared with mFI-5 for predicting 30-day mortality (C-statistic: RAI-Rev [0.84] and mFI-5 [0.67], P < 0.001), major complications (C-statistic: RAI-Rev [0.73] and mFI-5 [0.65], P < 0.001), and readmission (C-statistic: RAI-Rev [0.68] and mFI-5 [0.63], P < 0.001). However, mFI-5 outperformed RAI-Rev when predicting wound complications (C-statistic: RAI-Rev [0.52] and mFI-5 [0.55], P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The RAI-Rev tool demonstrated superior predictability of postoperative morbidity, mortality, and readmission rates compared with mFI-5 but was less effective in predicting surgical site complications. These findings demonstrate the utility of RAI-Rev in anticipating postoperative complications in the setting of orthopaedic trauma, where optimizing surgical candidate selection is not always possible. Assessing the predicted morbidity and mortality through RAI-Rev enables surgeons to accurately identify patients at high risk of complications, which can further research investigation to mitigate this risk.

Abstract Image

修正风险分析指数作为骨科创伤死亡率和发病率预测因子的应用。
目的:本研究的目的是确定修订风险分析指数(RAI-Rev)在骨科创伤中的适用性,并比较RAI-Rev和5项修订虚弱指数(mFI-5)对术后30天预后的预测区别。设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究。背景:使用美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进数据库。患者选择:所有在2015 - 2020年间接受前臂、肱骨、骨盆、髋臼、股骨、胫骨和后足骨折手术治疗的18岁及以上患者纳入研究。结果:测量术后30天死亡率、主要并发症、伤口并发症包括手术部位感染和伤口裂开。结果:共有206352例患者符合纳入标准。平均年龄69岁,女性占64.2% (n = 132,514)。多因素回归分析显示,RAI-Rev和mFI-5中衰弱等级的增加是死亡率、主要并发症、再入院和伤口并发症的独立预测因子。在RAI-Rev和mFI-5中虚弱程度最高的队列预后不良的风险最大。在预测30天死亡率(C-statistic: RAI-Rev[0.84]和mFI-5 [0.67], P < 0.001)、主要并发症(C-statistic: RAI-Rev[0.73]和mFI-5 [0.65], P < 0.001)和再入院(C-statistic: RAI-Rev[0.68]和mFI-5 [0.63], P < 0.001)方面,RAI-Rev具有显著优于mFI-5的预测歧视性阈值。然而,mFI-5在预测伤口并发症方面优于RAI-Rev (C-statistic: RAI-Rev[0.52]和mFI-5 [0.55], P < 0.001)。结论:与mFI-5相比,RAI-Rev工具在预测术后发病率、死亡率和再入院率方面表现出更高的可预测性,但在预测手术部位并发症方面效果较差。这些研究结果表明,在骨科创伤的情况下,优化手术候选人的选择并不总是可能的,RAI-Rev在预测术后并发症方面的效用。通过RAI-Rev评估预测的发病率和死亡率,使外科医生能够准确地识别高危并发症患者,从而进一步研究降低这种风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信