Screening and Care for Emotional and Cognitive Problems After Ischemic Stroke: Results of a Multicenter, Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology Pub Date : 2025-07-08 Epub Date: 2025-06-09 DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000213774
Jos P L Slenders, Renske M Van Den Berg-Vos, Caroline M Van Heugten, Johanna Visser-Meily, Ruben P A van Eijk, Marthè A A Moonen, Sarah Godefrooij, Vincent I H Kwa
{"title":"Screening and Care for Emotional and Cognitive Problems After Ischemic Stroke: Results of a Multicenter, Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Jos P L Slenders, Renske M Van Den Berg-Vos, Caroline M Van Heugten, Johanna Visser-Meily, Ruben P A van Eijk, Marthè A A Moonen, Sarah Godefrooij, Vincent I H Kwa","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000213774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Evidence regarding effectiveness of screening for emotional and cognitive problems after stroke is lacking. The primary aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that an intervention focusing on screening and care for emotional and cognitive problems after stroke would improve societal participation at 1 year. Second, we tested the hypotheses that this intervention would improve emotional and cognitive concerns, symptoms of anxiety, symptoms of depression, quality of life (QoL), self-efficacy, and disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, patient-masked, cluster-randomized controlled trial assigned clusters (1:1) to intervention or usual care. Clusters were Dutch nonuniversity hospitals with a stroke unit. Ischemic stroke patients aged 18 years and older discharged home without inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation were included. The intervention was a consultation conducted by a specialized stroke nurse at the outpatient neurology clinics at 6 weeks after stroke and included screening for emotional and cognitive problems, screening for participation restrictions, self-management support, and, if needed, referral to rehabilitation services. The primary outcome was societal participation (Restrictions subscale of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation [USER-P-R]) 1 year after stroke. Secondary outcomes were cognitive and emotional concerns (Checklist for Cognitive and Emotional Consequences following Stroke), symptoms of anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety subscale [HADS-A]), symptoms of depression (HADS-Depression subscale), QoL (5-level version of the EuroQoL 5-dimensional questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L], EuroQoL Visual Analog Scale [EQ-VAS], and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System [PROMIS-10]), self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy Scale), and disability (modified Rankin Scale) at 3 and 12 months. Continuous outcome data were analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures, and ordinal data were analyzed with an ordinal mixed-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between August 14, 2019, and May 11, 2022, a total of 531 patients were included in 12 clusters. The mean age was 70.6 ± 9.7 years, 40.0% were female, and the median NIH Stroke Scale score was 2 (2). Two hundred sixty-four patients were included in 6 hospitals providing the intervention and 267 patients in 6 hospitals providing usual care. Primary analysis demonstrated no difference in USER-P-R score at 1 year after stroke (mean difference [MD] 0.77; 95% CI -2.46 to 4.06; <i>p</i> = 0.652). Secondary outcome analyses at 3 months showed a MD between the intervention group and usual care group in HADS-A scores of -0.86 (95% CI -1.33 to -0.39), a MD in EQ-5D-5L index scores of 0.044 (95% CI 0.022-0.065), and a MD in EQ-VAS score of 2.90 (95% CI 0.69-5.10). Secondary outcome analyses at 1 year demonstrated a MD in EQ-5D-5L index scores of 0.043 (95% CI 0.021-0.064).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Screening for emotional and cognitive problems did not improve societal participation at 1 year after stroke. The potential for improvement in anxiety and QoL warrants further investigation. Cost-effectiveness will be analyzed in our upcoming economic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration information: </strong>Netherlands Trial Register: NL7295. Registered: September 25, 2018. First patient enrolled: August 14, 2019.</p><p><strong>Classification of evidence: </strong>This study provides Class III evidence that, in patients recovering from an ischemic stroke, active screening for emotional and cognitive problems at 6 weeks after stroke did not improve societal participation at 1 year.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"105 1","pages":"e213774"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12151330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000213774","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Evidence regarding effectiveness of screening for emotional and cognitive problems after stroke is lacking. The primary aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that an intervention focusing on screening and care for emotional and cognitive problems after stroke would improve societal participation at 1 year. Second, we tested the hypotheses that this intervention would improve emotional and cognitive concerns, symptoms of anxiety, symptoms of depression, quality of life (QoL), self-efficacy, and disability.

Methods: This multicenter, patient-masked, cluster-randomized controlled trial assigned clusters (1:1) to intervention or usual care. Clusters were Dutch nonuniversity hospitals with a stroke unit. Ischemic stroke patients aged 18 years and older discharged home without inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation were included. The intervention was a consultation conducted by a specialized stroke nurse at the outpatient neurology clinics at 6 weeks after stroke and included screening for emotional and cognitive problems, screening for participation restrictions, self-management support, and, if needed, referral to rehabilitation services. The primary outcome was societal participation (Restrictions subscale of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation [USER-P-R]) 1 year after stroke. Secondary outcomes were cognitive and emotional concerns (Checklist for Cognitive and Emotional Consequences following Stroke), symptoms of anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety subscale [HADS-A]), symptoms of depression (HADS-Depression subscale), QoL (5-level version of the EuroQoL 5-dimensional questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L], EuroQoL Visual Analog Scale [EQ-VAS], and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System [PROMIS-10]), self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy Scale), and disability (modified Rankin Scale) at 3 and 12 months. Continuous outcome data were analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures, and ordinal data were analyzed with an ordinal mixed-effects model.

Results: Between August 14, 2019, and May 11, 2022, a total of 531 patients were included in 12 clusters. The mean age was 70.6 ± 9.7 years, 40.0% were female, and the median NIH Stroke Scale score was 2 (2). Two hundred sixty-four patients were included in 6 hospitals providing the intervention and 267 patients in 6 hospitals providing usual care. Primary analysis demonstrated no difference in USER-P-R score at 1 year after stroke (mean difference [MD] 0.77; 95% CI -2.46 to 4.06; p = 0.652). Secondary outcome analyses at 3 months showed a MD between the intervention group and usual care group in HADS-A scores of -0.86 (95% CI -1.33 to -0.39), a MD in EQ-5D-5L index scores of 0.044 (95% CI 0.022-0.065), and a MD in EQ-VAS score of 2.90 (95% CI 0.69-5.10). Secondary outcome analyses at 1 year demonstrated a MD in EQ-5D-5L index scores of 0.043 (95% CI 0.021-0.064).

Discussion: Screening for emotional and cognitive problems did not improve societal participation at 1 year after stroke. The potential for improvement in anxiety and QoL warrants further investigation. Cost-effectiveness will be analyzed in our upcoming economic evaluation.

Trial registration information: Netherlands Trial Register: NL7295. Registered: September 25, 2018. First patient enrolled: August 14, 2019.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that, in patients recovering from an ischemic stroke, active screening for emotional and cognitive problems at 6 weeks after stroke did not improve societal participation at 1 year.

缺血性脑卒中后情绪和认知问题的筛查和护理:一项多中心、集群随机对照试验的结果
背景和目的:缺乏关于中风后情绪和认知问题筛查有效性的证据。本研究的主要目的是验证一种假设,即对中风后的情绪和认知问题进行筛查和护理的干预将在一年后改善社会参与。其次,我们测试了这种干预会改善情绪和认知问题、焦虑症状、抑郁症状、生活质量(QoL)、自我效能感和残疾的假设。方法:这是一项多中心、患者隐匿、分组随机对照试验,将分组(1:1)分配到干预组或常规护理组。聚集在荷兰的非大学医院,设有中风部门。18岁及以上的缺血性脑卒中患者出院回家,没有住院或门诊康复。干预是在中风后6周由一名专门的中风护士在门诊神经病学诊所进行咨询,包括情绪和认知问题的筛查,参与限制的筛查,自我管理支持,如果需要,转介到康复服务。主要结果是中风后1年的社会参与(乌得勒支康复参与评估量表的限制子量表[USER-P-R])。次要结局是认知和情绪关注(卒中后认知和情绪后果检查表)、焦虑症状(医院焦虑和抑郁量表-焦虑子量表[HADS-A])、抑郁症状(hads -抑郁子量表)、生活质量(EuroQoL 5维问卷的5级版本[EQ-5D-5L]、EuroQoL视觉模拟量表[EQ-VAS]和患者报告的结果测量信息系统[promise -10])、自我效能感(一般自我效能量表)、3个月和12个月时的残疾(改良Rankin量表)。连续结局数据采用重复测量的混合模型进行分析,有序数据采用有序混合效应模型进行分析。结果:2019年8月14日至2022年5月11日,共纳入12组患者531例。平均年龄70.6±9.7岁,女性40.0%,NIH卒中量表评分中位数为2(2)。在6家提供干预的医院中纳入264名患者,在6家提供常规护理的医院中纳入267名患者。初步分析显示卒中后1年的USER-P-R评分无差异(平均差异[MD] 0.77;95% CI -2.46 ~ 4.06;P = 0.652)。3个月时的次要结局分析显示,干预组与常规护理组在HADS-A评分中的MD为-0.86 (95% CI为-1.33 ~ -0.39),EQ-5D-5L指数评分中的MD为0.044 (95% CI为0.022 ~ 0.065),EQ-VAS评分中的MD为2.90 (95% CI为0.69 ~ 5.10)。1年的次要结局分析显示EQ-5D-5L指数评分的MD为0.043 (95% CI 0.021-0.064)。讨论:对情绪和认知问题的筛查并没有改善中风后1年的社会参与。改善焦虑和生活质量的潜力值得进一步研究。成本效益将在我们即将进行的经济评估中进行分析。试验注册信息:荷兰试验注册:NL7295。报名日期:2018年9月25日。首例入组患者:2019年8月14日。证据分类:本研究提供的III类证据表明,在缺血性卒中患者中,在卒中后6周积极筛查情绪和认知问题并没有改善1年后的社会参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信