Pushing advanced hemorrhage control interventions forward: Reducing prehospital mortality from traumatic hemorrhage through further adoption of effective military prehospital strategies.
Daniel Lammers, Reynold Henry, Richard Betzold, Joshua Dilday, John McClellan, Matthew Eckert, John B Holcomb
{"title":"Pushing advanced hemorrhage control interventions forward: Reducing prehospital mortality from traumatic hemorrhage through further adoption of effective military prehospital strategies.","authors":"Daniel Lammers, Reynold Henry, Richard Betzold, Joshua Dilday, John McClellan, Matthew Eckert, John B Holcomb","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Advancements in military medicine have had profound impacts on civilian trauma care. The current practices in civilian prehospital care focus on providing limited interventions in the field and rapid transport to higher levels of care. Very few prehospital emergency medical services in the United States have the capability to provide prehospital blood transfusions or advanced hemorrhage control procedures for trauma patients in hemorrhagic shock. As such, prehospital mortality from hemorrhage remains high. The United States military has adopted the use of prehospital blood transfusions during recent combat operations in the Middle East to mitigate prehospital mortality. Additionally, select military surgical teams capable of providing damage-control surgery as close to the point of injury as possible have been used to decrease the time to lifesaving interventions. This review seeks to assess current practices in civilian prehospital care within the United States while evaluating recent military medical lessons learned on prehospital blood products and minimizing time to lifesaving interventions, to identify potential opportunities to reduce mortality in civilian prehospital trauma care.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004674","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: Advancements in military medicine have had profound impacts on civilian trauma care. The current practices in civilian prehospital care focus on providing limited interventions in the field and rapid transport to higher levels of care. Very few prehospital emergency medical services in the United States have the capability to provide prehospital blood transfusions or advanced hemorrhage control procedures for trauma patients in hemorrhagic shock. As such, prehospital mortality from hemorrhage remains high. The United States military has adopted the use of prehospital blood transfusions during recent combat operations in the Middle East to mitigate prehospital mortality. Additionally, select military surgical teams capable of providing damage-control surgery as close to the point of injury as possible have been used to decrease the time to lifesaving interventions. This review seeks to assess current practices in civilian prehospital care within the United States while evaluating recent military medical lessons learned on prehospital blood products and minimizing time to lifesaving interventions, to identify potential opportunities to reduce mortality in civilian prehospital trauma care.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.