Impact of Music Intervention or Usual Care on Sedative Exposure During a Spontaneous Awakening Trial among Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Prospective Randomized Feasibility Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Justin R Culshaw, Christopher A Droege, Elsira M Pina, Neil E Ernst, Dalton J Kuebel, Eric W Mueller
{"title":"Impact of Music Intervention or Usual Care on Sedative Exposure During a Spontaneous Awakening Trial among Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Prospective Randomized Feasibility Study.","authors":"Justin R Culshaw, Christopher A Droege, Elsira M Pina, Neil E Ernst, Dalton J Kuebel, Eric W Mueller","doi":"10.1177/08850666251343799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of research: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine if protocolized music intervention paired with spontaneous awakening trial (SAT) is a feasible intervention for mechanically ventilated and sedated intensive care unit (ICU) patients to reduce overall sedation exposure.</p><p><strong>Major findings: </strong>Patients were admitted to the medical ICU (MICU) or surgical ICU (SICU), mechanically ventilated for at least 24 h with anticipated duration of at least 72 h, and with hearing optimized to baseline disposition. Patients were excluded if they had a specified prior to admission diagnosis, traumatic or medical encephalopathy, or need for deep sedation. Eligible patients were randomized to music intervention or usual care during SAT. Patients in the music intervention group underwent a second randomization to Commercial Music Intervention (CMI) or Preference Music Intervention (PMI).The primary outcome was sedation exposure via sedation intensity score (SIS), an aggregate of the frequency and intensity of sedatives from disparate drug classes such as opioids, anxiolytics, antipsychotics, and others, which was summed for exposure comparison. The usual care group had significantly higher median SIS compared to the music intervention group (4 [IQR 4.9-6.4] vs 3 [IQR 3.1-4.2], <i>P</i> = .0006). Patients who received PMI had significantly higher mean SIS compared to the CMI group (5 ± 2.4 vs 2.3 ± 1.7, <i>P</i> = .0002). Compared to usual care, the music intervention group had a higher percentage of delirium-free ICU days (37% vs 22%, <i>P</i> = .009) and a higher percentage of CPOT scores at goal (69% vs 52%, <i>P</i> = .002), but no difference in percentage of goal sedation scores (64% vs 67%, <i>P</i> = .7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Protocolized music intervention paired with daily spontaneous awakening trial is a feasible routine intervention for mechanically ventilated patients. Future studies are needed to confirm if this intervention may reduce overall sedation requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666251343799"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251343799","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of research: The objective of this study was to determine if protocolized music intervention paired with spontaneous awakening trial (SAT) is a feasible intervention for mechanically ventilated and sedated intensive care unit (ICU) patients to reduce overall sedation exposure.

Major findings: Patients were admitted to the medical ICU (MICU) or surgical ICU (SICU), mechanically ventilated for at least 24 h with anticipated duration of at least 72 h, and with hearing optimized to baseline disposition. Patients were excluded if they had a specified prior to admission diagnosis, traumatic or medical encephalopathy, or need for deep sedation. Eligible patients were randomized to music intervention or usual care during SAT. Patients in the music intervention group underwent a second randomization to Commercial Music Intervention (CMI) or Preference Music Intervention (PMI).The primary outcome was sedation exposure via sedation intensity score (SIS), an aggregate of the frequency and intensity of sedatives from disparate drug classes such as opioids, anxiolytics, antipsychotics, and others, which was summed for exposure comparison. The usual care group had significantly higher median SIS compared to the music intervention group (4 [IQR 4.9-6.4] vs 3 [IQR 3.1-4.2], P = .0006). Patients who received PMI had significantly higher mean SIS compared to the CMI group (5 ± 2.4 vs 2.3 ± 1.7, P = .0002). Compared to usual care, the music intervention group had a higher percentage of delirium-free ICU days (37% vs 22%, P = .009) and a higher percentage of CPOT scores at goal (69% vs 52%, P = .002), but no difference in percentage of goal sedation scores (64% vs 67%, P = .7).

Conclusions: Protocolized music intervention paired with daily spontaneous awakening trial is a feasible routine intervention for mechanically ventilated patients. Future studies are needed to confirm if this intervention may reduce overall sedation requirements.

在接受机械通气的重症监护病房患者自发觉醒试验中,音乐干预或常规护理对镇静暴露的影响:一项前瞻性随机可行性研究。
研究目的:本研究的目的是确定协议化音乐干预与自发觉醒试验(SAT)相结合对机械通气和镇静的重症监护病房(ICU)患者是否可行,以减少整体镇静暴露。主要发现:患者入住内科ICU (MICU)或外科ICU (SICU),机械通气至少24小时,预计持续时间至少72小时,听力优化至基线处置。如果患者在入院前有特定的诊断,创伤性或内科脑病,或需要深度镇静,则排除在外。符合条件的患者在SAT期间被随机分配到音乐干预组或常规护理组。音乐干预组的患者进行了第二次随机分配到商业音乐干预组(CMI)或偏好音乐干预组(PMI)。主要结局是通过镇静强度评分(SIS)观察镇静暴露,SIS是不同药物类别(如阿片类药物、抗焦虑药、抗精神病药等)镇静的频率和强度的总和,并将其汇总用于暴露比较。常规护理组的中位SIS明显高于音乐干预组(4 [IQR 4.9-6.4] vs 3 [IQR 3.1-4.2], P = 0.0006)。与CMI组相比,PMI组患者的平均SIS显著高于CMI组(5±2.4 vs 2.3±1.7,P = 0.0002)。与常规护理组相比,音乐干预组无谵妄ICU天数百分比更高(37%对22%,P = 0.009), CPOT评分百分比更高(69%对52%,P = 0.002),但目标镇静评分百分比无差异(64%对67%,P = .7)。结论:协议化音乐干预配合每日自发觉醒试验对机械通气患者是一种可行的常规干预方法。未来的研究需要证实这种干预是否可以减少总体镇静需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信