Corentin Deckers, Isabel Montesinos, Pierre Emmanuel Plum, Matteo Bassetti, Patrick M Honoré
{"title":"Invasive <i>Candida</i> in the abdomen: how to differentiate infection from colonization.","authors":"Corentin Deckers, Isabel Montesinos, Pierre Emmanuel Plum, Matteo Bassetti, Patrick M Honoré","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2025.2516553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) is a serious complication in critically ill patients, particularly after abdominal surgery or trauma. Differentiating Candida colonization from invasive infection is crucial, as misdiagnosis can lead to inappropriate antifungal use, increased resistance, and worse outcomes. However, IAC remains underrecognized due to the limitations of conventional culture-based diagnostics. Relevant literature was identified through a non-systematic search of the PubMed database.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review highlights the challenges in diagnosing and managing IAC, focusing on the limitations of traditional culture methods and the potential of non-culture-based diagnostics. Biomarkers such as 1-3-β-D-glucan (BDG) and Candida albicans germ tube antibody (CAGTA), along with molecular assays, improve diagnostic accuracy but have varying sensitivity and specificity, requiring a multimodal approach. Management involves early diagnosis, source control, and targeted antifungal therapy. Current guidelines, largely based on candidemia, recommend echinocandins as first-line therapy, with fluconazole for stable patients and amphotericin B for resistant strains.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Despite advances, IAC-specific research is lacking, necessitating improved diagnostic tools and tailored therapies. There is a need for more targeted studies to refine diagnostic algorithms and therapeutic strategies. Future efforts should focus on developing rapid, high-sensitivity and specific diagnostic tools, optimizing antifungal stewardship, and individualizing treatment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2025.2516553","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) is a serious complication in critically ill patients, particularly after abdominal surgery or trauma. Differentiating Candida colonization from invasive infection is crucial, as misdiagnosis can lead to inappropriate antifungal use, increased resistance, and worse outcomes. However, IAC remains underrecognized due to the limitations of conventional culture-based diagnostics. Relevant literature was identified through a non-systematic search of the PubMed database.
Areas covered: This review highlights the challenges in diagnosing and managing IAC, focusing on the limitations of traditional culture methods and the potential of non-culture-based diagnostics. Biomarkers such as 1-3-β-D-glucan (BDG) and Candida albicans germ tube antibody (CAGTA), along with molecular assays, improve diagnostic accuracy but have varying sensitivity and specificity, requiring a multimodal approach. Management involves early diagnosis, source control, and targeted antifungal therapy. Current guidelines, largely based on candidemia, recommend echinocandins as first-line therapy, with fluconazole for stable patients and amphotericin B for resistant strains.
Expert opinion: Despite advances, IAC-specific research is lacking, necessitating improved diagnostic tools and tailored therapies. There is a need for more targeted studies to refine diagnostic algorithms and therapeutic strategies. Future efforts should focus on developing rapid, high-sensitivity and specific diagnostic tools, optimizing antifungal stewardship, and individualizing treatment approaches.
腹内念珠菌病(IAC)是危重病人的严重并发症,特别是腹部手术或创伤后。区分念珠菌定植与侵袭性感染是至关重要的,因为误诊可能导致不适当的抗真菌药物使用,增加耐药性和更糟糕的结果。然而,由于传统的基于培养的诊断的局限性,IAC仍未得到充分认识。通过对PubMed数据库的非系统搜索确定了相关文献。涵盖领域:本综述强调了诊断和管理IAC的挑战,重点是传统培养方法的局限性和非培养诊断的潜力。生物标志物,如1-3-β- d -葡聚糖(BDG)和白色念珠菌生殖管抗体(CAGTA),以及分子检测,提高了诊断的准确性,但具有不同的敏感性和特异性,需要多模式方法。治疗包括早期诊断、源头控制和靶向抗真菌治疗。目前的指南主要基于念珠菌病,推荐棘白菌素作为一线治疗,稳定患者使用氟康唑,耐药菌株使用两性霉素B。专家意见:尽管取得了进展,但缺乏针对iac的研究,因此需要改进诊断工具和定制治疗。需要更多有针对性的研究来完善诊断算法和治疗策略。未来的工作应集中在开发快速,高灵敏度和特异性的诊断工具,优化抗真菌管理和个性化治疗方法。
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy (ISSN 1478-7210) provides expert reviews on therapeutics and diagnostics in the treatment of infectious disease. Coverage includes antibiotics, drug resistance, drug therapy, infectious disease medicine, antibacterial, antimicrobial, antifungal and antiviral approaches, and diagnostic tests.