Genetic background and multidomain interventions in mild cognitive impairment.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kosuke Fujita, Tetsuaki Kimura, Akiko Yamakawa, Shumpei Niida, Kouichi Ozaki, Takashi Sakurai, Hidenori Arai, Daichi Shigemizu
{"title":"Genetic background and multidomain interventions in mild cognitive impairment.","authors":"Kosuke Fujita, Tetsuaki Kimura, Akiko Yamakawa, Shumpei Niida, Kouichi Ozaki, Takashi Sakurai, Hidenori Arai, Daichi Shigemizu","doi":"10.1186/s13195-025-01764-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The growing prevalence of dementia emphasizes the need for effective prevention strategies. Although the partial efficacy of multidomain interventions for dementia prevention has been demonstrated, understanding the characteristics of individuals who benefit most from these interventions is crucial for optimizing resource allocation. This study investigated the association between participants' genetic backgrounds and the effectiveness of multidomain interventions for preventing dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized data from the Japan-Multimodal Intervention Trial for the Prevention of Dementia (J-MINT), where older adults with mild cognitive impairment underwent 18 months of multidomain intervention. The intervention included exercise, nutrition, cognitive stimulation, social participation, and vascular risk management. Participants who completed the J-MINT intervention and had genetic data, including whole-genome sequencing (WGS), were analyzed. Using Japanese polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for Alzheimer's disease, participants were stratified into high- and low-genetic-risk groups. Cognitive composite score (CPS) improvement rates at 6-, 12-, and 18-months were compared between intervention and control groups, with subgroup analyses performed by age (< 75 and <math><mo>≥</mo></math> 75 years). Additionally, a comprehensive variant analysis using WGS was conducted to identify genetic signals potentially associated with the intervention's effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 289 participants analyzed (168 aged < 75 years; 121 aged ≥ 75 years), 99 were classified into the high-risk PRS group (56 intervention, 43 control) and 190 into the low-risk PRS group (92 intervention, 98 control). For participants aged ≥ 75 years, no statistically significant differences in CPS improvement rates were observed between the intervention and control groups, regardless of PRS classification. However, in participants aged < 75, those in the high-risk PRS group showed significant CPS improvement at the 6-month follow-up. Additionally, analysis of 9,978,605 genetic variants identified two loci, ID3 and LMO1 (rs2067053 and rs201082658), with suggestive associations (P < 1 × 10⁻<sup>4</sup>) to reduced intervention effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlighted the utility of PRS in predicting cognitive improvement following multidomain interventions and identified genetic variants that may influence the intervention's effectiveness. The findings provide a valuable foundation for personalized dementia prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"130"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01764-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The growing prevalence of dementia emphasizes the need for effective prevention strategies. Although the partial efficacy of multidomain interventions for dementia prevention has been demonstrated, understanding the characteristics of individuals who benefit most from these interventions is crucial for optimizing resource allocation. This study investigated the association between participants' genetic backgrounds and the effectiveness of multidomain interventions for preventing dementia.

Methods: This study utilized data from the Japan-Multimodal Intervention Trial for the Prevention of Dementia (J-MINT), where older adults with mild cognitive impairment underwent 18 months of multidomain intervention. The intervention included exercise, nutrition, cognitive stimulation, social participation, and vascular risk management. Participants who completed the J-MINT intervention and had genetic data, including whole-genome sequencing (WGS), were analyzed. Using Japanese polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for Alzheimer's disease, participants were stratified into high- and low-genetic-risk groups. Cognitive composite score (CPS) improvement rates at 6-, 12-, and 18-months were compared between intervention and control groups, with subgroup analyses performed by age (< 75 and 75 years). Additionally, a comprehensive variant analysis using WGS was conducted to identify genetic signals potentially associated with the intervention's effectiveness.

Results: Among 289 participants analyzed (168 aged < 75 years; 121 aged ≥ 75 years), 99 were classified into the high-risk PRS group (56 intervention, 43 control) and 190 into the low-risk PRS group (92 intervention, 98 control). For participants aged ≥ 75 years, no statistically significant differences in CPS improvement rates were observed between the intervention and control groups, regardless of PRS classification. However, in participants aged < 75, those in the high-risk PRS group showed significant CPS improvement at the 6-month follow-up. Additionally, analysis of 9,978,605 genetic variants identified two loci, ID3 and LMO1 (rs2067053 and rs201082658), with suggestive associations (P < 1 × 10⁻4) to reduced intervention effectiveness.

Conclusions: This study highlighted the utility of PRS in predicting cognitive improvement following multidomain interventions and identified genetic variants that may influence the intervention's effectiveness. The findings provide a valuable foundation for personalized dementia prevention strategies.

轻度认知障碍的遗传背景和多领域干预。
背景:痴呆症的日益流行强调了有效预防策略的必要性。虽然多领域干预预防痴呆的部分功效已被证明,但了解从这些干预中获益最多的个体的特征对于优化资源分配至关重要。本研究调查了参与者的遗传背景和多领域干预预防痴呆的有效性之间的关系。方法:本研究利用了日本预防痴呆多模式干预试验(J-MINT)的数据,在该试验中,患有轻度认知障碍的老年人接受了18个月的多领域干预。干预包括锻炼、营养、认知刺激、社会参与和血管风险管理。完成J-MINT干预并具有遗传数据(包括全基因组测序(WGS))的参与者进行分析。使用日本阿尔茨海默病多基因风险评分(PRSs),参与者被分为高遗传风险组和低遗传风险组。比较干预组和对照组在6个月、12个月和18个月时的认知综合评分(CPS)改善率,并按年龄(≥75岁)进行亚组分析。此外,使用WGS进行了全面的变异分析,以确定可能与干预有效性相关的遗传信号。结果:289名参与者(168名4岁)干预效果降低。结论:本研究强调了PRS在预测多领域干预后认知改善方面的效用,并确定了可能影响干预有效性的遗传变异。这些发现为个性化的痴呆症预防策略提供了有价值的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信