X-linked gene expression and X-chromosome inactivation: marsupials, mouse, and man compared.

Isozymes Pub Date : 1987-01-01
J L VandeBerg, E S Robinson, P B Samollow, P G Johnston
{"title":"X-linked gene expression and X-chromosome inactivation: marsupials, mouse, and man compared.","authors":"J L VandeBerg,&nbsp;E S Robinson,&nbsp;P B Samollow,&nbsp;P G Johnston","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The existence of paternal X inactivation in Australian and American marsupial species suggests that this feature of X-chromosome dosage compensation is not a recent adaptation, but probably predates the evolutionary separation of the Australian and American marsupial lineages. Although it is theoretically possible that the marsupial system is one of random X inactivation with p greater than 0.99 and q less than 0.01 and dependent on parental source, no instance of random X inactivation (p = q or p not equal to q) has ever been verified in any tissue or cell type of any marsupial species. Therefore, we conclude that the most fundamental difference in X inactivation of marsupials and eutherians is whether the inactive X is the paternal one or is determined at random (with p = q in most but not all cases). The only other unequivocal difference between eutherians and marsupials is that both X chromosomes are active in mice and human oocytes, but not in kangaroo oocytes. Apparently, the inactive X is reactivated at a later meiotic stage or during early embryogenesis in kangaroos. X-chromosome inactivation takes place early in embryogenesis of eutherians and marsupials. Extraembryonic membranes of mice exhibit paternal X inactivation, whereas those of humans seem to exhibit random X inactivation with p greater than q (i.e., preferential paternal X inactivation). In general, extraembryonic membranes of marsupial exhibit paternal X inactivation, but the Gpd locus is active on both X chromosomes in at least some cells of kangaroo yolk sac. It is difficult to draw any general conclusion because of major differences in embryogeny of mice, humans, and marsupials, and uncertainties in interpreting the data from humans. Other differences between marsupials and eutherians in patterns of X-linked gene expression and X-chromosome inactivation seem to be quantitative rather than qualitative. Partial expression of some genes on the inactive X is characteristic of marsupials, with species variation in the behavior of specific loci; some X-linked human genes on the inactive chromosome also are known to exhibit partial activity in vivo and in cultured cells. The X chromosomes of marsupials do not behave as units with respect to transcriptional activity, nor does the human X chromosome. In addition, Barr bodies have recently been detected at interphase in some marsupials, establishing that this manifestation of X chromosome inactivity is not restricted to eutherians.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77729,"journal":{"name":"Isozymes","volume":"15 ","pages":"225-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Isozymes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existence of paternal X inactivation in Australian and American marsupial species suggests that this feature of X-chromosome dosage compensation is not a recent adaptation, but probably predates the evolutionary separation of the Australian and American marsupial lineages. Although it is theoretically possible that the marsupial system is one of random X inactivation with p greater than 0.99 and q less than 0.01 and dependent on parental source, no instance of random X inactivation (p = q or p not equal to q) has ever been verified in any tissue or cell type of any marsupial species. Therefore, we conclude that the most fundamental difference in X inactivation of marsupials and eutherians is whether the inactive X is the paternal one or is determined at random (with p = q in most but not all cases). The only other unequivocal difference between eutherians and marsupials is that both X chromosomes are active in mice and human oocytes, but not in kangaroo oocytes. Apparently, the inactive X is reactivated at a later meiotic stage or during early embryogenesis in kangaroos. X-chromosome inactivation takes place early in embryogenesis of eutherians and marsupials. Extraembryonic membranes of mice exhibit paternal X inactivation, whereas those of humans seem to exhibit random X inactivation with p greater than q (i.e., preferential paternal X inactivation). In general, extraembryonic membranes of marsupial exhibit paternal X inactivation, but the Gpd locus is active on both X chromosomes in at least some cells of kangaroo yolk sac. It is difficult to draw any general conclusion because of major differences in embryogeny of mice, humans, and marsupials, and uncertainties in interpreting the data from humans. Other differences between marsupials and eutherians in patterns of X-linked gene expression and X-chromosome inactivation seem to be quantitative rather than qualitative. Partial expression of some genes on the inactive X is characteristic of marsupials, with species variation in the behavior of specific loci; some X-linked human genes on the inactive chromosome also are known to exhibit partial activity in vivo and in cultured cells. The X chromosomes of marsupials do not behave as units with respect to transcriptional activity, nor does the human X chromosome. In addition, Barr bodies have recently been detected at interphase in some marsupials, establishing that this manifestation of X chromosome inactivity is not restricted to eutherians.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

x连锁基因表达和x染色体失活:有袋动物、小鼠和人类的比较。
在澳大利亚和美洲有袋动物物种中父系X失活的存在表明,这种X染色体剂量补偿的特征不是最近的适应,而可能早于澳大利亚和美洲有袋动物谱系的进化分离。虽然理论上有可能有袋动物系统是一个随机X失活系统,p大于0.99,q小于0.01,依赖于亲本来源,但在任何有袋动物物种的任何组织或细胞类型中都没有证实随机X失活(p = q或p不等于q)的实例。因此,我们得出结论,有袋动物和真兽的X失活最根本的区别在于失活的X是父系的还是随机决定的(在大多数情况下p = q,但不是所有情况)。真兽和有袋动物之间唯一的另一个明确的区别是,X染色体在老鼠和人类的卵母细胞中都是活跃的,而在袋鼠的卵母细胞中则不是。显然,失活的X在袋鼠减数分裂后期或早期胚胎发生时被重新激活。x染色体失活发生在真动物和有袋动物胚胎发生的早期。小鼠的胚胎外膜表现出父系X失活,而人类的胚胎外膜似乎表现出p大于q的随机X失活(即优先父系X失活)。一般来说,有袋动物的胚外膜表现为父系X失活,但至少在袋鼠卵黄囊的一些细胞中,Gpd位点在两个X染色体上都是活跃的。由于小鼠、人类和有袋动物的胚胎发育存在重大差异,而且对人类数据的解释存在不确定性,因此很难得出任何一般性结论。有袋动物和真兽在x连锁基因表达模式和x染色体失活方面的其他差异似乎是定量的而不是定性的。一些基因在失活X上的部分表达是有袋动物的特征,在特定位点的行为上存在物种差异;在非活性染色体上的一些x连锁人类基因在体内和培养细胞中也显示出部分活性。就转录活性而言,有袋动物的X染色体不是作为单位来表现的,人类的X染色体也不是。此外,Barr小体最近在一些有袋动物的间期被检测到,这表明这种X染色体不活跃的表现并不局限于真动物。(摘要删节为400字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信