Xu Ding , Zhigang Du , Mingxing Gao , Haixiao Wang
{"title":"Assessment of takeover safety in human–machine co-driving on grassland highways: Coupling effects of non-driving-related tasks and takeover scenarios","authors":"Xu Ding , Zhigang Du , Mingxing Gao , Haixiao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The unique environment of grassland highways offers new opportunities and challenges for human–machine co-driving technology. However, the coupling effects of non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs) and takeover scenarios on takeover safety remain unclear. This study designed a driving takeover simulation test featuring three typical takeover scenarios on grassland highways: a parked vehicle ahead, livestock obstructing the lane, and a ramp vehicle merging. Eye-movement and takeover behavior data were collected as drivers engaged in various NDRTs. Based on the takeover behavior pattern (environmental information perception—situational awareness recovery—takeover operation execution), the study developed an objective evaluation<!--> <!-->system for takeover safety, considering both visual behavior and takeover performance. The improved criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) method was applied to construct the Takeover Safety Index (TSI), enabling the graded quantitative assessment of takeover safety.<!--> <!-->The findings indicated<!--> <!-->that as the sensory involvement dimension of NDRTs increased, drivers’ visual field expanded, requiring more frequent information searches to restore situational awareness.<!--> <!-->When performing cognitive NDRTs, drivers’ alertness and their takeover reaction abilities improved.<!--> <!-->However, when NDRTs occupied visual and manual resources, drivers’ takeover performance significantly declined.<!--> <!-->Additionally, the high dynamics of the ramp vehicle merging scenario shortened drivers’ takeover reaction time but was accompanied by a deterioration in visual perception ability and takeover quality.<!--> <!-->Coupling effect analysis revealed that drivers’ takeover safety significantly decreased when engaged in watching videos and playing games in this scenario, with the proportion of TSI in the extremely unsafe interval reaching 25% and 35.7%, respectively.<!--> <!-->This suggests that the occupation of visual and manual resources by NDRTs and the high dynamics of risk obstacles are key factors affecting takeover safety. This study provides theoretical guidance for interventions in takeover behavior and optimization of autonomous driving systems in the human–machine co-driving environment on grassland highways.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 376-408"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825002116","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The unique environment of grassland highways offers new opportunities and challenges for human–machine co-driving technology. However, the coupling effects of non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs) and takeover scenarios on takeover safety remain unclear. This study designed a driving takeover simulation test featuring three typical takeover scenarios on grassland highways: a parked vehicle ahead, livestock obstructing the lane, and a ramp vehicle merging. Eye-movement and takeover behavior data were collected as drivers engaged in various NDRTs. Based on the takeover behavior pattern (environmental information perception—situational awareness recovery—takeover operation execution), the study developed an objective evaluation system for takeover safety, considering both visual behavior and takeover performance. The improved criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) method was applied to construct the Takeover Safety Index (TSI), enabling the graded quantitative assessment of takeover safety. The findings indicated that as the sensory involvement dimension of NDRTs increased, drivers’ visual field expanded, requiring more frequent information searches to restore situational awareness. When performing cognitive NDRTs, drivers’ alertness and their takeover reaction abilities improved. However, when NDRTs occupied visual and manual resources, drivers’ takeover performance significantly declined. Additionally, the high dynamics of the ramp vehicle merging scenario shortened drivers’ takeover reaction time but was accompanied by a deterioration in visual perception ability and takeover quality. Coupling effect analysis revealed that drivers’ takeover safety significantly decreased when engaged in watching videos and playing games in this scenario, with the proportion of TSI in the extremely unsafe interval reaching 25% and 35.7%, respectively. This suggests that the occupation of visual and manual resources by NDRTs and the high dynamics of risk obstacles are key factors affecting takeover safety. This study provides theoretical guidance for interventions in takeover behavior and optimization of autonomous driving systems in the human–machine co-driving environment on grassland highways.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.